An evaluation of prevention initiatives by 53 national anti-doping organizations: Achievements and limitations

Background: One main purpose of the World Anti-Doping Agency was to harmonize anti-doping efforts, including the provision of anti-doping education. A multifaceted approach to doping prevention can play a key role in preventing intentional and unintentional doping. This article aimed to systematical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katharina Gatterer, Matthias Gumpenberger, Marie Overbye, Bernhard Streicher, Wolfgang Schobersberger, Cornelia Blank
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-05-01
Series:Journal of Sport and Health Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095254619301498
_version_ 1828471181466927104
author Katharina Gatterer
Matthias Gumpenberger
Marie Overbye
Bernhard Streicher
Wolfgang Schobersberger
Cornelia Blank
author_facet Katharina Gatterer
Matthias Gumpenberger
Marie Overbye
Bernhard Streicher
Wolfgang Schobersberger
Cornelia Blank
author_sort Katharina Gatterer
collection DOAJ
description Background: One main purpose of the World Anti-Doping Agency was to harmonize anti-doping efforts, including the provision of anti-doping education. A multifaceted approach to doping prevention can play a key role in preventing intentional and unintentional doping. This article aimed to systematically record and evaluate doping prevention approaches in the form of information and education activities of national anti-doping organizations (NADOs) and assess the extent to which a multifaceted doping prevention approach has been realized. Methods: Data on anti-doping information and education activities of 53 NADOs were collected via a survey and an online search of the NADOs’ websites. Prevention activities were classified into knowledge focused, affective focused, social skills, life skills, and ethic- and value- based. The implementation of the prevention activities was assessed by 4 independent raters using a modified visual analogue scale. Results: In total, 59% of the NADOs (n = 38) returned the survey and 70% (n = 45) had information available online. The data were combined for the visual analogue scale assessment. Overall, 58% of the NADOs (n = 37) reported offering activities including elements of all 5 approaches. Results of the raters’ assessments indicated that the knowledge-focused approach was best implemented; the implementation of the other 4 approaches was largely unsatisfactory. The most common barriers to implementing doping prevention programs reported by the NADOs were lack of resources (n = 26) and difficulties in collaborating with sports organizations (n = 8). Conclusion: Results show a discrepancy between NADOs’ self-report data and the implementation assessment. Even though the NADOs indicated otherwise, most of their education-based approaches did not address aspects of the visual analogue scale (e.g., resisting peer pressure) and only a few programs were ongoing. Possible explanations might be found in the reported barriers (e.g., financial). Concrete guidelines defining multifaceted, values-based education, and best practice examples should be developed to indicate how to include all 5 approaches in prevention.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T05:06:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-19c2c081d62346ecbbe88118c7a26574
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2095-2546
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T05:06:40Z
publishDate 2020-05-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Sport and Health Science
spelling doaj.art-19c2c081d62346ecbbe88118c7a265742022-12-22T01:20:00ZengElsevierJournal of Sport and Health Science2095-25462020-05-0193228239An evaluation of prevention initiatives by 53 national anti-doping organizations: Achievements and limitationsKatharina Gatterer0Matthias Gumpenberger1Marie Overbye2Bernhard Streicher3Wolfgang Schobersberger4Cornelia Blank5Institute of Sports Medicine, Alpine Medicine & Health Tourism, Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Tyrol 6060, AustriaInstitute of Sports Medicine, Alpine Medicine & Health Tourism, Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Tyrol 6060, AustriaFaculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling FK94LA, UKInstitute of Psychology, Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Tyrol 6060, AustriaInstitute of Sports Medicine, Alpine Medicine & Health Tourism, Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Tyrol 6060, Austria; Tirol Clinics (Tirol-Kliniken), Innsbruck, Tyrol 6020, AustriaInstitute of Sports Medicine, Alpine Medicine & Health Tourism, Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Tyrol 6060, Austria; Corresponding author.Background: One main purpose of the World Anti-Doping Agency was to harmonize anti-doping efforts, including the provision of anti-doping education. A multifaceted approach to doping prevention can play a key role in preventing intentional and unintentional doping. This article aimed to systematically record and evaluate doping prevention approaches in the form of information and education activities of national anti-doping organizations (NADOs) and assess the extent to which a multifaceted doping prevention approach has been realized. Methods: Data on anti-doping information and education activities of 53 NADOs were collected via a survey and an online search of the NADOs’ websites. Prevention activities were classified into knowledge focused, affective focused, social skills, life skills, and ethic- and value- based. The implementation of the prevention activities was assessed by 4 independent raters using a modified visual analogue scale. Results: In total, 59% of the NADOs (n = 38) returned the survey and 70% (n = 45) had information available online. The data were combined for the visual analogue scale assessment. Overall, 58% of the NADOs (n = 37) reported offering activities including elements of all 5 approaches. Results of the raters’ assessments indicated that the knowledge-focused approach was best implemented; the implementation of the other 4 approaches was largely unsatisfactory. The most common barriers to implementing doping prevention programs reported by the NADOs were lack of resources (n = 26) and difficulties in collaborating with sports organizations (n = 8). Conclusion: Results show a discrepancy between NADOs’ self-report data and the implementation assessment. Even though the NADOs indicated otherwise, most of their education-based approaches did not address aspects of the visual analogue scale (e.g., resisting peer pressure) and only a few programs were ongoing. Possible explanations might be found in the reported barriers (e.g., financial). Concrete guidelines defining multifaceted, values-based education, and best practice examples should be developed to indicate how to include all 5 approaches in prevention.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095254619301498Anti-doping programDoping preventionEducationHarmonizationNADO
spellingShingle Katharina Gatterer
Matthias Gumpenberger
Marie Overbye
Bernhard Streicher
Wolfgang Schobersberger
Cornelia Blank
An evaluation of prevention initiatives by 53 national anti-doping organizations: Achievements and limitations
Journal of Sport and Health Science
Anti-doping program
Doping prevention
Education
Harmonization
NADO
title An evaluation of prevention initiatives by 53 national anti-doping organizations: Achievements and limitations
title_full An evaluation of prevention initiatives by 53 national anti-doping organizations: Achievements and limitations
title_fullStr An evaluation of prevention initiatives by 53 national anti-doping organizations: Achievements and limitations
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of prevention initiatives by 53 national anti-doping organizations: Achievements and limitations
title_short An evaluation of prevention initiatives by 53 national anti-doping organizations: Achievements and limitations
title_sort evaluation of prevention initiatives by 53 national anti doping organizations achievements and limitations
topic Anti-doping program
Doping prevention
Education
Harmonization
NADO
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095254619301498
work_keys_str_mv AT katharinagatterer anevaluationofpreventioninitiativesby53nationalantidopingorganizationsachievementsandlimitations
AT matthiasgumpenberger anevaluationofpreventioninitiativesby53nationalantidopingorganizationsachievementsandlimitations
AT marieoverbye anevaluationofpreventioninitiativesby53nationalantidopingorganizationsachievementsandlimitations
AT bernhardstreicher anevaluationofpreventioninitiativesby53nationalantidopingorganizationsachievementsandlimitations
AT wolfgangschobersberger anevaluationofpreventioninitiativesby53nationalantidopingorganizationsachievementsandlimitations
AT corneliablank anevaluationofpreventioninitiativesby53nationalantidopingorganizationsachievementsandlimitations
AT katharinagatterer evaluationofpreventioninitiativesby53nationalantidopingorganizationsachievementsandlimitations
AT matthiasgumpenberger evaluationofpreventioninitiativesby53nationalantidopingorganizationsachievementsandlimitations
AT marieoverbye evaluationofpreventioninitiativesby53nationalantidopingorganizationsachievementsandlimitations
AT bernhardstreicher evaluationofpreventioninitiativesby53nationalantidopingorganizationsachievementsandlimitations
AT wolfgangschobersberger evaluationofpreventioninitiativesby53nationalantidopingorganizationsachievementsandlimitations
AT corneliablank evaluationofpreventioninitiativesby53nationalantidopingorganizationsachievementsandlimitations