SARS-CoV-2 infection among employees working from home and on site: An occupational study in Switzerland

During the COVID-19 pandemic, many companies implemented working from home to mitigate the spread of the disease among their employees. Using data from Corona Immunitas Nestlé, a seroepidemiological study conducted among employees from two Nestlé sites in Switzerland, we aimed to investigate whether...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexia Schmid, Daniela Anker, Julie Dubois, Isabelle Bureau-Franz, Nathalie Piccardi, Sara Colombo Mottaz, Stéphane Cullati, Arnaud Chiolero, Pierre-Yves Rodondi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.980482/full
_version_ 1811260838136250368
author Alexia Schmid
Daniela Anker
Julie Dubois
Isabelle Bureau-Franz
Nathalie Piccardi
Sara Colombo Mottaz
Stéphane Cullati
Stéphane Cullati
Arnaud Chiolero
Arnaud Chiolero
Arnaud Chiolero
Pierre-Yves Rodondi
author_facet Alexia Schmid
Daniela Anker
Julie Dubois
Isabelle Bureau-Franz
Nathalie Piccardi
Sara Colombo Mottaz
Stéphane Cullati
Stéphane Cullati
Arnaud Chiolero
Arnaud Chiolero
Arnaud Chiolero
Pierre-Yves Rodondi
author_sort Alexia Schmid
collection DOAJ
description During the COVID-19 pandemic, many companies implemented working from home to mitigate the spread of the disease among their employees. Using data from Corona Immunitas Nestlé, a seroepidemiological study conducted among employees from two Nestlé sites in Switzerland, we aimed to investigate whether there was a difference in SARS-CoV-2 infection rates between employees working most of the time from home and employees mobilized in a workplace equipped with a specialized occupational safety unit and strict sanitary measures. We also investigated whether this association was modified by household size, living with children, vulnerability, worries about an infection, and worries about adverse health consequences if infected. Data were collected between 8 December 2020, and 11 February 2021. Previous SARS-CoV-2 infections were ascertained by the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in the blood. Of the 425 employees included (53% women; mean age 42 years ranging between 21 and 64 years), 37% worked most of the time from home in 2020 and 16% had been infected with SARS-CoV-2. Participants who worked most of the time from home in 2020 had slightly higher odds of being infected with SARS-CoV-2 compared to participants who never or only sometimes worked from home (adjusted OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.73–2.27). The association was stronger in participants living alone or with one other person (adjusted OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.13–6.25). Among participants living with two or more other persons (adjusted OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.30–1.39) and among vulnerable participants (adjusted OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.13–1.93), working from home tended to be associated with lower odds of infection. In conclusion, in a context of strict sanitary measures implemented in the workplace, employees working from home did not seem to be at lower risk of infection compared to those working on site, especially if living alone or with one other person.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T18:53:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-19d63c1699414d52b9e31e58836fc8dd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-2565
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T18:53:39Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Public Health
spelling doaj.art-19d63c1699414d52b9e31e58836fc8dd2022-12-22T03:20:23ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Public Health2296-25652022-09-011010.3389/fpubh.2022.980482980482SARS-CoV-2 infection among employees working from home and on site: An occupational study in SwitzerlandAlexia Schmid0Daniela Anker1Julie Dubois2Isabelle Bureau-Franz3Nathalie Piccardi4Sara Colombo Mottaz5Stéphane Cullati6Stéphane Cullati7Arnaud Chiolero8Arnaud Chiolero9Arnaud Chiolero10Pierre-Yves Rodondi11Institute of Family Medicine, Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, SwitzerlandPopulation Health Laboratory #PopHealthLab, Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, SwitzerlandInstitute of Family Medicine, Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, SwitzerlandNestlé Research, Lausanne, SwitzerlandNestlé Research, Lausanne, SwitzerlandNestlé Research, Lausanne, SwitzerlandPopulation Health Laboratory #PopHealthLab, Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, SwitzerlandDepartment of Readaptation and Geriatrics, University of Geneva, Geneva, SwitzerlandPopulation Health Laboratory #PopHealthLab, Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, SwitzerlandInstitute of Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, SwitzerlandSchool of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montréal, QC, CanadaInstitute of Family Medicine, Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, SwitzerlandDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, many companies implemented working from home to mitigate the spread of the disease among their employees. Using data from Corona Immunitas Nestlé, a seroepidemiological study conducted among employees from two Nestlé sites in Switzerland, we aimed to investigate whether there was a difference in SARS-CoV-2 infection rates between employees working most of the time from home and employees mobilized in a workplace equipped with a specialized occupational safety unit and strict sanitary measures. We also investigated whether this association was modified by household size, living with children, vulnerability, worries about an infection, and worries about adverse health consequences if infected. Data were collected between 8 December 2020, and 11 February 2021. Previous SARS-CoV-2 infections were ascertained by the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in the blood. Of the 425 employees included (53% women; mean age 42 years ranging between 21 and 64 years), 37% worked most of the time from home in 2020 and 16% had been infected with SARS-CoV-2. Participants who worked most of the time from home in 2020 had slightly higher odds of being infected with SARS-CoV-2 compared to participants who never or only sometimes worked from home (adjusted OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.73–2.27). The association was stronger in participants living alone or with one other person (adjusted OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.13–6.25). Among participants living with two or more other persons (adjusted OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.30–1.39) and among vulnerable participants (adjusted OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.13–1.93), working from home tended to be associated with lower odds of infection. In conclusion, in a context of strict sanitary measures implemented in the workplace, employees working from home did not seem to be at lower risk of infection compared to those working on site, especially if living alone or with one other person.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.980482/fulloccupational healthSARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19)COVID-19workplaceemployeeswork from home
spellingShingle Alexia Schmid
Daniela Anker
Julie Dubois
Isabelle Bureau-Franz
Nathalie Piccardi
Sara Colombo Mottaz
Stéphane Cullati
Stéphane Cullati
Arnaud Chiolero
Arnaud Chiolero
Arnaud Chiolero
Pierre-Yves Rodondi
SARS-CoV-2 infection among employees working from home and on site: An occupational study in Switzerland
Frontiers in Public Health
occupational health
SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19)
COVID-19
workplace
employees
work from home
title SARS-CoV-2 infection among employees working from home and on site: An occupational study in Switzerland
title_full SARS-CoV-2 infection among employees working from home and on site: An occupational study in Switzerland
title_fullStr SARS-CoV-2 infection among employees working from home and on site: An occupational study in Switzerland
title_full_unstemmed SARS-CoV-2 infection among employees working from home and on site: An occupational study in Switzerland
title_short SARS-CoV-2 infection among employees working from home and on site: An occupational study in Switzerland
title_sort sars cov 2 infection among employees working from home and on site an occupational study in switzerland
topic occupational health
SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19)
COVID-19
workplace
employees
work from home
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.980482/full
work_keys_str_mv AT alexiaschmid sarscov2infectionamongemployeesworkingfromhomeandonsiteanoccupationalstudyinswitzerland
AT danielaanker sarscov2infectionamongemployeesworkingfromhomeandonsiteanoccupationalstudyinswitzerland
AT juliedubois sarscov2infectionamongemployeesworkingfromhomeandonsiteanoccupationalstudyinswitzerland
AT isabellebureaufranz sarscov2infectionamongemployeesworkingfromhomeandonsiteanoccupationalstudyinswitzerland
AT nathaliepiccardi sarscov2infectionamongemployeesworkingfromhomeandonsiteanoccupationalstudyinswitzerland
AT saracolombomottaz sarscov2infectionamongemployeesworkingfromhomeandonsiteanoccupationalstudyinswitzerland
AT stephanecullati sarscov2infectionamongemployeesworkingfromhomeandonsiteanoccupationalstudyinswitzerland
AT stephanecullati sarscov2infectionamongemployeesworkingfromhomeandonsiteanoccupationalstudyinswitzerland
AT arnaudchiolero sarscov2infectionamongemployeesworkingfromhomeandonsiteanoccupationalstudyinswitzerland
AT arnaudchiolero sarscov2infectionamongemployeesworkingfromhomeandonsiteanoccupationalstudyinswitzerland
AT arnaudchiolero sarscov2infectionamongemployeesworkingfromhomeandonsiteanoccupationalstudyinswitzerland
AT pierreyvesrodondi sarscov2infectionamongemployeesworkingfromhomeandonsiteanoccupationalstudyinswitzerland