Characterization of Six-Degree-of-Freedom Sensors for Building Health Monitoring

Six-degree-of-freedom (6DoF) sensors measure translation along three axes and rotation around three axes. These collocated measurements make it possible to fully describe building motion without the need for an external reference point. This is an advantage for building health monitoring, which uses...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Louisa Murray-Bergquist, Felix Bernauer, Heiner Igel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-05-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/11/3732
_version_ 1797532373637660672
author Louisa Murray-Bergquist
Felix Bernauer
Heiner Igel
author_facet Louisa Murray-Bergquist
Felix Bernauer
Heiner Igel
author_sort Louisa Murray-Bergquist
collection DOAJ
description Six-degree-of-freedom (6DoF) sensors measure translation along three axes and rotation around three axes. These collocated measurements make it possible to fully describe building motion without the need for an external reference point. This is an advantage for building health monitoring, which uses interstory drift and building eigenfrequencies to monitor stability. In this paper, IMU50 6DoF sensors are characterized to determine their suitability for building health monitoring. The sensors are calibrated using step table methods and by comparison with earth’s rotation and gravity. These methods are found to be comparable. The sensor’s self-noise is examined through the power spectral density and the Allan deviation of data recorded in a quiet environment. The effect of temperature variation is tested between 14 and 50 <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><msup><mrow></mrow><mo>°</mo></msup></semantics></math></inline-formula>C. It appears that the self-noise of the rotation components increases while the self-noise of the acceleration components decreases with temperature. The comparison of the sensor self-noise with ambient building signal and higher amplitude shaking shows that these sensors are in general not sensitive enough for ambient signal building health monitoring in the frequency domain, but could be useful for monitoring interstory drift and building motion during, for example, strong earthquake shaking in buildings similar to those examined here.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T10:58:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-19e7c645847041d387fc5351a3d2c431
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T10:58:13Z
publishDate 2021-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-19e7c645847041d387fc5351a3d2c4312023-11-21T21:39:35ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202021-05-012111373210.3390/s21113732Characterization of Six-Degree-of-Freedom Sensors for Building Health MonitoringLouisa Murray-Bergquist0Felix Bernauer1Heiner Igel2Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, 80539 Munich, GermanyDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, 80539 Munich, GermanyDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, 80539 Munich, GermanySix-degree-of-freedom (6DoF) sensors measure translation along three axes and rotation around three axes. These collocated measurements make it possible to fully describe building motion without the need for an external reference point. This is an advantage for building health monitoring, which uses interstory drift and building eigenfrequencies to monitor stability. In this paper, IMU50 6DoF sensors are characterized to determine their suitability for building health monitoring. The sensors are calibrated using step table methods and by comparison with earth’s rotation and gravity. These methods are found to be comparable. The sensor’s self-noise is examined through the power spectral density and the Allan deviation of data recorded in a quiet environment. The effect of temperature variation is tested between 14 and 50 <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><msup><mrow></mrow><mo>°</mo></msup></semantics></math></inline-formula>C. It appears that the self-noise of the rotation components increases while the self-noise of the acceleration components decreases with temperature. The comparison of the sensor self-noise with ambient building signal and higher amplitude shaking shows that these sensors are in general not sensitive enough for ambient signal building health monitoring in the frequency domain, but could be useful for monitoring interstory drift and building motion during, for example, strong earthquake shaking in buildings similar to those examined here.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/11/37326DoFrotationseismologySHMMEMSFOG
spellingShingle Louisa Murray-Bergquist
Felix Bernauer
Heiner Igel
Characterization of Six-Degree-of-Freedom Sensors for Building Health Monitoring
Sensors
6DoF
rotation
seismology
SHM
MEMS
FOG
title Characterization of Six-Degree-of-Freedom Sensors for Building Health Monitoring
title_full Characterization of Six-Degree-of-Freedom Sensors for Building Health Monitoring
title_fullStr Characterization of Six-Degree-of-Freedom Sensors for Building Health Monitoring
title_full_unstemmed Characterization of Six-Degree-of-Freedom Sensors for Building Health Monitoring
title_short Characterization of Six-Degree-of-Freedom Sensors for Building Health Monitoring
title_sort characterization of six degree of freedom sensors for building health monitoring
topic 6DoF
rotation
seismology
SHM
MEMS
FOG
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/11/3732
work_keys_str_mv AT louisamurraybergquist characterizationofsixdegreeoffreedomsensorsforbuildinghealthmonitoring
AT felixbernauer characterizationofsixdegreeoffreedomsensorsforbuildinghealthmonitoring
AT heinerigel characterizationofsixdegreeoffreedomsensorsforbuildinghealthmonitoring