An incentive-based mitigation strategy to encourage coexistence of large mammals and humans along the foothills of Indian Western Himalayas
Abstract Escalation of human–wildlife conflict (HWC) is a barrier to the conservation of ecological corridors across the globe. The existing mechanisms to counter HWC are either economically and socially taxing, or ineffective for long-term management. We assessed HWC in the corridor linking the Raj...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84119-7 |
_version_ | 1818842951324794880 |
---|---|
author | Ruchi Badola Tanveer Ahmed Amanat Kaur Gill Pariva Dobriyal Goura Chandra Das Srishti Badola Syed Ainul Hussain |
author_facet | Ruchi Badola Tanveer Ahmed Amanat Kaur Gill Pariva Dobriyal Goura Chandra Das Srishti Badola Syed Ainul Hussain |
author_sort | Ruchi Badola |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Escalation of human–wildlife conflict (HWC) is a barrier to the conservation of ecological corridors across the globe. The existing mechanisms to counter HWC are either economically and socially taxing, or ineffective for long-term management. We assessed HWC in the corridor linking the Rajaji and Corbett Tiger Reserves in Uttarakhand, India, and its drivers, along with the benefits derived by local communities from the forest. We designed an innovative incentive-based mitigation mechanism to encourage coexistence of people and wildlife around the corridor. Costs incurred due to conflict and benefits derived from the forest were assessed using semi-structured questionnaire-based personal interviews (n = 757) with representatives from forest dependent households (hh). Fuelwood (1678.7 ± 131 kg hh−1 year−1), fodder (4772 ± 186 kg hh−1 year−1) and green/dry grass (3359 ± 104 kg hh−1 year−1) contributed 3 ± 1%, 6 ± 0.5% and 9 ± 1%, respectively, to the annual income of dependent households. 69% of the households practising agriculture reported crop damage by wild animals, 19% of the households that owned livestock reported livestock loss, and 1.58% reported attack on humans resulting in injuries. The cost incurred due to crop raiding and livestock depredation was US $ 159.83 ± 1.0 hh−1 year−1 and US $ 229.32 ± 34.0 hh−1 year−1, respectively. Crop loss was positively associated with the number of crops grown per season and cultivation of sugarcane, wheat and pulses, and negatively with distance from forest and cultivation of fodder and finger millet. Livestock depredation was negatively associated with distance from forest and positively with number of livestock owned, primarily calves. The accounting profit from cultivating a hectare of land, in the absence of crop depredation by wild animals, was estimated at US $ 3571.84 ha−1 year−1 and US $ 361.44 ha−1 year−1 for the plains and hills, respectively. This value can be used to calculate the payments to be paid to local communities to encourage them to adopt HWC resistant agricultural and pastoralism practices. The net present value of benefits from participating in the payments to encourage coexistence programme for 5 years, discounted at 12%, was US $ 12,875.7 ha−1 for the plains and US $ 1302.9 ha−1 for the hills. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-19T04:50:08Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-19ece03bff414aedb922a1a7a506c212 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2045-2322 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-19T04:50:08Z |
publishDate | 2021-03-01 |
publisher | Nature Portfolio |
record_format | Article |
series | Scientific Reports |
spelling | doaj.art-19ece03bff414aedb922a1a7a506c2122022-12-21T20:35:22ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222021-03-0111111310.1038/s41598-021-84119-7An incentive-based mitigation strategy to encourage coexistence of large mammals and humans along the foothills of Indian Western HimalayasRuchi Badola0Tanveer Ahmed1Amanat Kaur Gill2Pariva Dobriyal3Goura Chandra Das4Srishti Badola5Syed Ainul Hussain6Wildlife Institute of IndiaWildlife Institute of IndiaWildlife Institute of IndiaWildlife Institute of IndiaWildlife Institute of IndiaWildlife Institute of IndiaWildlife Institute of IndiaAbstract Escalation of human–wildlife conflict (HWC) is a barrier to the conservation of ecological corridors across the globe. The existing mechanisms to counter HWC are either economically and socially taxing, or ineffective for long-term management. We assessed HWC in the corridor linking the Rajaji and Corbett Tiger Reserves in Uttarakhand, India, and its drivers, along with the benefits derived by local communities from the forest. We designed an innovative incentive-based mitigation mechanism to encourage coexistence of people and wildlife around the corridor. Costs incurred due to conflict and benefits derived from the forest were assessed using semi-structured questionnaire-based personal interviews (n = 757) with representatives from forest dependent households (hh). Fuelwood (1678.7 ± 131 kg hh−1 year−1), fodder (4772 ± 186 kg hh−1 year−1) and green/dry grass (3359 ± 104 kg hh−1 year−1) contributed 3 ± 1%, 6 ± 0.5% and 9 ± 1%, respectively, to the annual income of dependent households. 69% of the households practising agriculture reported crop damage by wild animals, 19% of the households that owned livestock reported livestock loss, and 1.58% reported attack on humans resulting in injuries. The cost incurred due to crop raiding and livestock depredation was US $ 159.83 ± 1.0 hh−1 year−1 and US $ 229.32 ± 34.0 hh−1 year−1, respectively. Crop loss was positively associated with the number of crops grown per season and cultivation of sugarcane, wheat and pulses, and negatively with distance from forest and cultivation of fodder and finger millet. Livestock depredation was negatively associated with distance from forest and positively with number of livestock owned, primarily calves. The accounting profit from cultivating a hectare of land, in the absence of crop depredation by wild animals, was estimated at US $ 3571.84 ha−1 year−1 and US $ 361.44 ha−1 year−1 for the plains and hills, respectively. This value can be used to calculate the payments to be paid to local communities to encourage them to adopt HWC resistant agricultural and pastoralism practices. The net present value of benefits from participating in the payments to encourage coexistence programme for 5 years, discounted at 12%, was US $ 12,875.7 ha−1 for the plains and US $ 1302.9 ha−1 for the hills.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84119-7 |
spellingShingle | Ruchi Badola Tanveer Ahmed Amanat Kaur Gill Pariva Dobriyal Goura Chandra Das Srishti Badola Syed Ainul Hussain An incentive-based mitigation strategy to encourage coexistence of large mammals and humans along the foothills of Indian Western Himalayas Scientific Reports |
title | An incentive-based mitigation strategy to encourage coexistence of large mammals and humans along the foothills of Indian Western Himalayas |
title_full | An incentive-based mitigation strategy to encourage coexistence of large mammals and humans along the foothills of Indian Western Himalayas |
title_fullStr | An incentive-based mitigation strategy to encourage coexistence of large mammals and humans along the foothills of Indian Western Himalayas |
title_full_unstemmed | An incentive-based mitigation strategy to encourage coexistence of large mammals and humans along the foothills of Indian Western Himalayas |
title_short | An incentive-based mitigation strategy to encourage coexistence of large mammals and humans along the foothills of Indian Western Himalayas |
title_sort | incentive based mitigation strategy to encourage coexistence of large mammals and humans along the foothills of indian western himalayas |
url | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84119-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ruchibadola anincentivebasedmitigationstrategytoencouragecoexistenceoflargemammalsandhumansalongthefoothillsofindianwesternhimalayas AT tanveerahmed anincentivebasedmitigationstrategytoencouragecoexistenceoflargemammalsandhumansalongthefoothillsofindianwesternhimalayas AT amanatkaurgill anincentivebasedmitigationstrategytoencouragecoexistenceoflargemammalsandhumansalongthefoothillsofindianwesternhimalayas AT parivadobriyal anincentivebasedmitigationstrategytoencouragecoexistenceoflargemammalsandhumansalongthefoothillsofindianwesternhimalayas AT gourachandradas anincentivebasedmitigationstrategytoencouragecoexistenceoflargemammalsandhumansalongthefoothillsofindianwesternhimalayas AT srishtibadola anincentivebasedmitigationstrategytoencouragecoexistenceoflargemammalsandhumansalongthefoothillsofindianwesternhimalayas AT syedainulhussain anincentivebasedmitigationstrategytoencouragecoexistenceoflargemammalsandhumansalongthefoothillsofindianwesternhimalayas AT ruchibadola incentivebasedmitigationstrategytoencouragecoexistenceoflargemammalsandhumansalongthefoothillsofindianwesternhimalayas AT tanveerahmed incentivebasedmitigationstrategytoencouragecoexistenceoflargemammalsandhumansalongthefoothillsofindianwesternhimalayas AT amanatkaurgill incentivebasedmitigationstrategytoencouragecoexistenceoflargemammalsandhumansalongthefoothillsofindianwesternhimalayas AT parivadobriyal incentivebasedmitigationstrategytoencouragecoexistenceoflargemammalsandhumansalongthefoothillsofindianwesternhimalayas AT gourachandradas incentivebasedmitigationstrategytoencouragecoexistenceoflargemammalsandhumansalongthefoothillsofindianwesternhimalayas AT srishtibadola incentivebasedmitigationstrategytoencouragecoexistenceoflargemammalsandhumansalongthefoothillsofindianwesternhimalayas AT syedainulhussain incentivebasedmitigationstrategytoencouragecoexistenceoflargemammalsandhumansalongthefoothillsofindianwesternhimalayas |