An incentive-based mitigation strategy to encourage coexistence of large mammals and humans along the foothills of Indian Western Himalayas

Abstract Escalation of human–wildlife conflict (HWC) is a barrier to the conservation of ecological corridors across the globe. The existing mechanisms to counter HWC are either economically and socially taxing, or ineffective for long-term management. We assessed HWC in the corridor linking the Raj...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ruchi Badola, Tanveer Ahmed, Amanat Kaur Gill, Pariva Dobriyal, Goura Chandra Das, Srishti Badola, Syed Ainul Hussain
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2021-03-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84119-7
_version_ 1818842951324794880
author Ruchi Badola
Tanveer Ahmed
Amanat Kaur Gill
Pariva Dobriyal
Goura Chandra Das
Srishti Badola
Syed Ainul Hussain
author_facet Ruchi Badola
Tanveer Ahmed
Amanat Kaur Gill
Pariva Dobriyal
Goura Chandra Das
Srishti Badola
Syed Ainul Hussain
author_sort Ruchi Badola
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Escalation of human–wildlife conflict (HWC) is a barrier to the conservation of ecological corridors across the globe. The existing mechanisms to counter HWC are either economically and socially taxing, or ineffective for long-term management. We assessed HWC in the corridor linking the Rajaji and Corbett Tiger Reserves in Uttarakhand, India, and its drivers, along with the benefits derived by local communities from the forest. We designed an innovative incentive-based mitigation mechanism to encourage coexistence of people and wildlife around the corridor. Costs incurred due to conflict and benefits derived from the forest were assessed using semi-structured questionnaire-based personal interviews (n = 757) with representatives from forest dependent households (hh). Fuelwood (1678.7 ± 131 kg hh−1 year−1), fodder (4772 ± 186 kg hh−1 year−1) and green/dry grass (3359 ± 104 kg hh−1 year−1) contributed 3 ± 1%, 6 ± 0.5% and 9 ± 1%, respectively, to the annual income of dependent households. 69% of the households practising agriculture reported crop damage by wild animals, 19% of the households that owned livestock reported livestock loss, and 1.58% reported attack on humans resulting in injuries. The cost incurred due to crop raiding and livestock depredation was US $ 159.83 ± 1.0 hh−1 year−1 and US $ 229.32 ± 34.0 hh−1 year−1, respectively. Crop loss was positively associated with the number of crops grown per season and cultivation of sugarcane, wheat and pulses, and negatively with distance from forest and cultivation of fodder and finger millet. Livestock depredation was negatively associated with distance from forest and positively with number of livestock owned, primarily calves. The accounting profit from cultivating a hectare of land, in the absence of crop depredation by wild animals, was estimated at US $ 3571.84 ha−1 year−1 and US $ 361.44 ha−1 year−1 for the plains and hills, respectively. This value can be used to calculate the payments to be paid to local communities to encourage them to adopt HWC resistant agricultural and pastoralism practices. The net present value of benefits from participating in the payments to encourage coexistence programme for 5 years, discounted at 12%, was US $ 12,875.7 ha−1 for the plains and US $ 1302.9 ha−1 for the hills.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T04:50:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-19ece03bff414aedb922a1a7a506c212
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T04:50:08Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-19ece03bff414aedb922a1a7a506c2122022-12-21T20:35:22ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222021-03-0111111310.1038/s41598-021-84119-7An incentive-based mitigation strategy to encourage coexistence of large mammals and humans along the foothills of Indian Western HimalayasRuchi Badola0Tanveer Ahmed1Amanat Kaur Gill2Pariva Dobriyal3Goura Chandra Das4Srishti Badola5Syed Ainul Hussain6Wildlife Institute of IndiaWildlife Institute of IndiaWildlife Institute of IndiaWildlife Institute of IndiaWildlife Institute of IndiaWildlife Institute of IndiaWildlife Institute of IndiaAbstract Escalation of human–wildlife conflict (HWC) is a barrier to the conservation of ecological corridors across the globe. The existing mechanisms to counter HWC are either economically and socially taxing, or ineffective for long-term management. We assessed HWC in the corridor linking the Rajaji and Corbett Tiger Reserves in Uttarakhand, India, and its drivers, along with the benefits derived by local communities from the forest. We designed an innovative incentive-based mitigation mechanism to encourage coexistence of people and wildlife around the corridor. Costs incurred due to conflict and benefits derived from the forest were assessed using semi-structured questionnaire-based personal interviews (n = 757) with representatives from forest dependent households (hh). Fuelwood (1678.7 ± 131 kg hh−1 year−1), fodder (4772 ± 186 kg hh−1 year−1) and green/dry grass (3359 ± 104 kg hh−1 year−1) contributed 3 ± 1%, 6 ± 0.5% and 9 ± 1%, respectively, to the annual income of dependent households. 69% of the households practising agriculture reported crop damage by wild animals, 19% of the households that owned livestock reported livestock loss, and 1.58% reported attack on humans resulting in injuries. The cost incurred due to crop raiding and livestock depredation was US $ 159.83 ± 1.0 hh−1 year−1 and US $ 229.32 ± 34.0 hh−1 year−1, respectively. Crop loss was positively associated with the number of crops grown per season and cultivation of sugarcane, wheat and pulses, and negatively with distance from forest and cultivation of fodder and finger millet. Livestock depredation was negatively associated with distance from forest and positively with number of livestock owned, primarily calves. The accounting profit from cultivating a hectare of land, in the absence of crop depredation by wild animals, was estimated at US $ 3571.84 ha−1 year−1 and US $ 361.44 ha−1 year−1 for the plains and hills, respectively. This value can be used to calculate the payments to be paid to local communities to encourage them to adopt HWC resistant agricultural and pastoralism practices. The net present value of benefits from participating in the payments to encourage coexistence programme for 5 years, discounted at 12%, was US $ 12,875.7 ha−1 for the plains and US $ 1302.9 ha−1 for the hills.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84119-7
spellingShingle Ruchi Badola
Tanveer Ahmed
Amanat Kaur Gill
Pariva Dobriyal
Goura Chandra Das
Srishti Badola
Syed Ainul Hussain
An incentive-based mitigation strategy to encourage coexistence of large mammals and humans along the foothills of Indian Western Himalayas
Scientific Reports
title An incentive-based mitigation strategy to encourage coexistence of large mammals and humans along the foothills of Indian Western Himalayas
title_full An incentive-based mitigation strategy to encourage coexistence of large mammals and humans along the foothills of Indian Western Himalayas
title_fullStr An incentive-based mitigation strategy to encourage coexistence of large mammals and humans along the foothills of Indian Western Himalayas
title_full_unstemmed An incentive-based mitigation strategy to encourage coexistence of large mammals and humans along the foothills of Indian Western Himalayas
title_short An incentive-based mitigation strategy to encourage coexistence of large mammals and humans along the foothills of Indian Western Himalayas
title_sort incentive based mitigation strategy to encourage coexistence of large mammals and humans along the foothills of indian western himalayas
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84119-7
work_keys_str_mv AT ruchibadola anincentivebasedmitigationstrategytoencouragecoexistenceoflargemammalsandhumansalongthefoothillsofindianwesternhimalayas
AT tanveerahmed anincentivebasedmitigationstrategytoencouragecoexistenceoflargemammalsandhumansalongthefoothillsofindianwesternhimalayas
AT amanatkaurgill anincentivebasedmitigationstrategytoencouragecoexistenceoflargemammalsandhumansalongthefoothillsofindianwesternhimalayas
AT parivadobriyal anincentivebasedmitigationstrategytoencouragecoexistenceoflargemammalsandhumansalongthefoothillsofindianwesternhimalayas
AT gourachandradas anincentivebasedmitigationstrategytoencouragecoexistenceoflargemammalsandhumansalongthefoothillsofindianwesternhimalayas
AT srishtibadola anincentivebasedmitigationstrategytoencouragecoexistenceoflargemammalsandhumansalongthefoothillsofindianwesternhimalayas
AT syedainulhussain anincentivebasedmitigationstrategytoencouragecoexistenceoflargemammalsandhumansalongthefoothillsofindianwesternhimalayas
AT ruchibadola incentivebasedmitigationstrategytoencouragecoexistenceoflargemammalsandhumansalongthefoothillsofindianwesternhimalayas
AT tanveerahmed incentivebasedmitigationstrategytoencouragecoexistenceoflargemammalsandhumansalongthefoothillsofindianwesternhimalayas
AT amanatkaurgill incentivebasedmitigationstrategytoencouragecoexistenceoflargemammalsandhumansalongthefoothillsofindianwesternhimalayas
AT parivadobriyal incentivebasedmitigationstrategytoencouragecoexistenceoflargemammalsandhumansalongthefoothillsofindianwesternhimalayas
AT gourachandradas incentivebasedmitigationstrategytoencouragecoexistenceoflargemammalsandhumansalongthefoothillsofindianwesternhimalayas
AT srishtibadola incentivebasedmitigationstrategytoencouragecoexistenceoflargemammalsandhumansalongthefoothillsofindianwesternhimalayas
AT syedainulhussain incentivebasedmitigationstrategytoencouragecoexistenceoflargemammalsandhumansalongthefoothillsofindianwesternhimalayas