The effect of individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status on gastric cancer survival.

<h4>Purpose</h4>Gastric cancer is a leading cause of death, particularly in the developing world. The literature reports individual socioeconomic status (SES) or neighborhood SES as related to survival, but the effect of both has not been studied. This study investigated the effect of in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chin-Chia Wu, Ta-Wen Hsu, Chun-Ming Chang, Chia-Hui Yu, Yuh-Feng Wang, Ching-Chih Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0089655&type=printable
_version_ 1826588588070928384
author Chin-Chia Wu
Ta-Wen Hsu
Chun-Ming Chang
Chia-Hui Yu
Yuh-Feng Wang
Ching-Chih Lee
author_facet Chin-Chia Wu
Ta-Wen Hsu
Chun-Ming Chang
Chia-Hui Yu
Yuh-Feng Wang
Ching-Chih Lee
author_sort Chin-Chia Wu
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Purpose</h4>Gastric cancer is a leading cause of death, particularly in the developing world. The literature reports individual socioeconomic status (SES) or neighborhood SES as related to survival, but the effect of both has not been studied. This study investigated the effect of individual and neighborhood SES simultaneously on mortality in gastric cancer patients in Taiwan.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>A study was conducted of 3,396 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer between 2002 and 2006. Each patient was followed for five years or until death. Individual SES was defined by income-related insurance premium (low, moderate, and high). Neighborhood SES was based on household income dichotomized into advantaged and disadvantaged areas. Multilevel logistic regression model was used to compare survival rates by SES group after adjusting for possible confounding factors.<h4>Results</h4>In patients younger than 65 years, 5-year overall survival rates were lowest for those with low individual SES. After adjusting for patient characteristics (age, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index Score), gastric cancer patients with high individual SES had 68% risk reduction of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR] of mortality, 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.61). Patients aged 65 and above had no statistically significant difference in mortality rates by individual SES group. Different neighborhood SES did not statistically differ in the survival rates.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Gastric cancer patients aged less than 65 years old with low individual SES have higher risk of mortality, even under an universal healthcare system. Public health strategies, education and welfare policies should seek to correct the inequality in gastric cancer survival, especially in those with lower individual SES.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T00:54:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-19ef5ec026c04779ae6d094c67f87285
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2025-03-14T16:43:43Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-19ef5ec026c04779ae6d094c67f872852025-02-21T05:37:55ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0192e8965510.1371/journal.pone.0089655The effect of individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status on gastric cancer survival.Chin-Chia WuTa-Wen HsuChun-Ming ChangChia-Hui YuYuh-Feng WangChing-Chih Lee<h4>Purpose</h4>Gastric cancer is a leading cause of death, particularly in the developing world. The literature reports individual socioeconomic status (SES) or neighborhood SES as related to survival, but the effect of both has not been studied. This study investigated the effect of individual and neighborhood SES simultaneously on mortality in gastric cancer patients in Taiwan.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>A study was conducted of 3,396 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer between 2002 and 2006. Each patient was followed for five years or until death. Individual SES was defined by income-related insurance premium (low, moderate, and high). Neighborhood SES was based on household income dichotomized into advantaged and disadvantaged areas. Multilevel logistic regression model was used to compare survival rates by SES group after adjusting for possible confounding factors.<h4>Results</h4>In patients younger than 65 years, 5-year overall survival rates were lowest for those with low individual SES. After adjusting for patient characteristics (age, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index Score), gastric cancer patients with high individual SES had 68% risk reduction of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR] of mortality, 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.61). Patients aged 65 and above had no statistically significant difference in mortality rates by individual SES group. Different neighborhood SES did not statistically differ in the survival rates.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Gastric cancer patients aged less than 65 years old with low individual SES have higher risk of mortality, even under an universal healthcare system. Public health strategies, education and welfare policies should seek to correct the inequality in gastric cancer survival, especially in those with lower individual SES.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0089655&type=printable
spellingShingle Chin-Chia Wu
Ta-Wen Hsu
Chun-Ming Chang
Chia-Hui Yu
Yuh-Feng Wang
Ching-Chih Lee
The effect of individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status on gastric cancer survival.
PLoS ONE
title The effect of individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status on gastric cancer survival.
title_full The effect of individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status on gastric cancer survival.
title_fullStr The effect of individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status on gastric cancer survival.
title_full_unstemmed The effect of individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status on gastric cancer survival.
title_short The effect of individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status on gastric cancer survival.
title_sort effect of individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status on gastric cancer survival
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0089655&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT chinchiawu theeffectofindividualandneighborhoodsocioeconomicstatusongastriccancersurvival
AT tawenhsu theeffectofindividualandneighborhoodsocioeconomicstatusongastriccancersurvival
AT chunmingchang theeffectofindividualandneighborhoodsocioeconomicstatusongastriccancersurvival
AT chiahuiyu theeffectofindividualandneighborhoodsocioeconomicstatusongastriccancersurvival
AT yuhfengwang theeffectofindividualandneighborhoodsocioeconomicstatusongastriccancersurvival
AT chingchihlee theeffectofindividualandneighborhoodsocioeconomicstatusongastriccancersurvival
AT chinchiawu effectofindividualandneighborhoodsocioeconomicstatusongastriccancersurvival
AT tawenhsu effectofindividualandneighborhoodsocioeconomicstatusongastriccancersurvival
AT chunmingchang effectofindividualandneighborhoodsocioeconomicstatusongastriccancersurvival
AT chiahuiyu effectofindividualandneighborhoodsocioeconomicstatusongastriccancersurvival
AT yuhfengwang effectofindividualandneighborhoodsocioeconomicstatusongastriccancersurvival
AT chingchihlee effectofindividualandneighborhoodsocioeconomicstatusongastriccancersurvival