Atypical Rulings of the Indonesian Constitutional Court

In deciding judicial review cases, the Court may issue rulings that is not in accordance to what is stipulated in the Constitutional Court Law (Law Number 8 Year 2011). Atypical rulings means that the court may reconstruct a provision, delay the legislation/rulings enactment or give instruction to l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bisariyadi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hasanuddin University 2016-08-01
Series:Hasanuddin Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pasca.unhas.ac.id/ojs/index.php/halrev/article/view/306/173
_version_ 1819195412602421248
author Bisariyadi
author_facet Bisariyadi
author_sort Bisariyadi
collection DOAJ
description In deciding judicial review cases, the Court may issue rulings that is not in accordance to what is stipulated in the Constitutional Court Law (Law Number 8 Year 2011). Atypical rulings means that the court may reconstruct a provision, delay the legislation/rulings enactment or give instruction to lawmakers. In addition, the court also introduce the “conditionally (un)constitutional” concept. This essay attempts to identify and classify these atypical rulings, including conditionally (un) constitutional rulings, by examined the constitutional court judicial review rulings from 2003 to 2015. This study will provide a ground work for advance research on typical rulings by the Indonesian constitutional court.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T02:12:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-19fe94bfa4c244ff90fd83a8855eb367
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2442-9880
2442-9899
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T02:12:21Z
publishDate 2016-08-01
publisher Hasanuddin University
record_format Article
series Hasanuddin Law Review
spelling doaj.art-19fe94bfa4c244ff90fd83a8855eb3672022-12-21T18:03:45ZengHasanuddin UniversityHasanuddin Law Review2442-98802442-98992016-08-012222524010.20956/halrev.v1n2.306Atypical Rulings of the Indonesian Constitutional CourtBisariyadi0Research Center and Assessment of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of IndonesiaIn deciding judicial review cases, the Court may issue rulings that is not in accordance to what is stipulated in the Constitutional Court Law (Law Number 8 Year 2011). Atypical rulings means that the court may reconstruct a provision, delay the legislation/rulings enactment or give instruction to lawmakers. In addition, the court also introduce the “conditionally (un)constitutional” concept. This essay attempts to identify and classify these atypical rulings, including conditionally (un) constitutional rulings, by examined the constitutional court judicial review rulings from 2003 to 2015. This study will provide a ground work for advance research on typical rulings by the Indonesian constitutional court.http://pasca.unhas.ac.id/ojs/index.php/halrev/article/view/306/173Constitutional CourtCourt RulingsConditionally (un)ConstitutionalPositive Legislature
spellingShingle Bisariyadi
Atypical Rulings of the Indonesian Constitutional Court
Hasanuddin Law Review
Constitutional Court
Court Rulings
Conditionally (un)Constitutional
Positive Legislature
title Atypical Rulings of the Indonesian Constitutional Court
title_full Atypical Rulings of the Indonesian Constitutional Court
title_fullStr Atypical Rulings of the Indonesian Constitutional Court
title_full_unstemmed Atypical Rulings of the Indonesian Constitutional Court
title_short Atypical Rulings of the Indonesian Constitutional Court
title_sort atypical rulings of the indonesian constitutional court
topic Constitutional Court
Court Rulings
Conditionally (un)Constitutional
Positive Legislature
url http://pasca.unhas.ac.id/ojs/index.php/halrev/article/view/306/173
work_keys_str_mv AT bisariyadi atypicalrulingsoftheindonesianconstitutionalcourt