Atypical Rulings of the Indonesian Constitutional Court
In deciding judicial review cases, the Court may issue rulings that is not in accordance to what is stipulated in the Constitutional Court Law (Law Number 8 Year 2011). Atypical rulings means that the court may reconstruct a provision, delay the legislation/rulings enactment or give instruction to l...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hasanuddin University
2016-08-01
|
Series: | Hasanuddin Law Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://pasca.unhas.ac.id/ojs/index.php/halrev/article/view/306/173 |
_version_ | 1819195412602421248 |
---|---|
author | Bisariyadi |
author_facet | Bisariyadi |
author_sort | Bisariyadi |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In deciding judicial review cases, the Court may issue rulings that is not in accordance to what is stipulated in the Constitutional Court Law (Law Number 8 Year 2011). Atypical rulings means that the court may reconstruct a provision, delay the legislation/rulings enactment or give instruction to lawmakers. In addition, the court also introduce the “conditionally (un)constitutional” concept. This essay attempts to identify and classify these atypical rulings, including conditionally (un) constitutional rulings, by examined the constitutional court judicial review rulings from 2003 to 2015. This study will provide a ground work for advance research on typical rulings by the Indonesian constitutional court. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-23T02:12:21Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-19fe94bfa4c244ff90fd83a8855eb367 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2442-9880 2442-9899 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-23T02:12:21Z |
publishDate | 2016-08-01 |
publisher | Hasanuddin University |
record_format | Article |
series | Hasanuddin Law Review |
spelling | doaj.art-19fe94bfa4c244ff90fd83a8855eb3672022-12-21T18:03:45ZengHasanuddin UniversityHasanuddin Law Review2442-98802442-98992016-08-012222524010.20956/halrev.v1n2.306Atypical Rulings of the Indonesian Constitutional CourtBisariyadi0Research Center and Assessment of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of IndonesiaIn deciding judicial review cases, the Court may issue rulings that is not in accordance to what is stipulated in the Constitutional Court Law (Law Number 8 Year 2011). Atypical rulings means that the court may reconstruct a provision, delay the legislation/rulings enactment or give instruction to lawmakers. In addition, the court also introduce the “conditionally (un)constitutional” concept. This essay attempts to identify and classify these atypical rulings, including conditionally (un) constitutional rulings, by examined the constitutional court judicial review rulings from 2003 to 2015. This study will provide a ground work for advance research on typical rulings by the Indonesian constitutional court.http://pasca.unhas.ac.id/ojs/index.php/halrev/article/view/306/173Constitutional CourtCourt RulingsConditionally (un)ConstitutionalPositive Legislature |
spellingShingle | Bisariyadi Atypical Rulings of the Indonesian Constitutional Court Hasanuddin Law Review Constitutional Court Court Rulings Conditionally (un)Constitutional Positive Legislature |
title | Atypical Rulings of the Indonesian Constitutional Court |
title_full | Atypical Rulings of the Indonesian Constitutional Court |
title_fullStr | Atypical Rulings of the Indonesian Constitutional Court |
title_full_unstemmed | Atypical Rulings of the Indonesian Constitutional Court |
title_short | Atypical Rulings of the Indonesian Constitutional Court |
title_sort | atypical rulings of the indonesian constitutional court |
topic | Constitutional Court Court Rulings Conditionally (un)Constitutional Positive Legislature |
url | http://pasca.unhas.ac.id/ojs/index.php/halrev/article/view/306/173 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bisariyadi atypicalrulingsoftheindonesianconstitutionalcourt |