Debating Phenomenological Research Methods

Phenomenological researchers generally agree that our central concern is to return to embodied, experiential meanings aiming for a fresh, complex, rich description of a phenomenon as it is concretely lived. Yet debates abound when it comes to deciding how best to carry out this phenomenological rese...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Linda Finlay
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Alberta 2009-12-01
Series:Phenomenology & Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/pandpr/index.php/pandpr/article/view/19818
_version_ 1811311769519390720
author Linda Finlay
author_facet Linda Finlay
author_sort Linda Finlay
collection DOAJ
description Phenomenological researchers generally agree that our central concern is to return to embodied, experiential meanings aiming for a fresh, complex, rich description of a phenomenon as it is concretely lived. Yet debates abound when it comes to deciding how best to carry out this phenomenological research in practice. Confusion about how to conduct appropriate phenomenological research makes our field difficult for novices to access. Six particular questions are contested: (1) How tightly or loosely should we define what counts as "phenomenology" (2) Should we always aim to produce a general (normative) description of the phenomenon, or is idiographic analysis a legitimate aim? (3) To what extent should interpretation be involved in our descriptions? (4) Should we set aside or bring to the foreground researcher subjectivity? (5) Should phenomenology be more science than art? (6) Is phenomenology a modernist or postmodernist project, or neither? In this paper, I examine each of these areas of contention in the spirit of fostering dialogue, and promoting openness and clarity in phenomenological inquiry.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T10:24:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1a0169680bfc40068b75b46d107087ba
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1913-4711
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T10:24:43Z
publishDate 2009-12-01
publisher University of Alberta
record_format Article
series Phenomenology & Practice
spelling doaj.art-1a0169680bfc40068b75b46d107087ba2022-12-22T02:50:21ZengUniversity of AlbertaPhenomenology & Practice1913-47112009-12-013110.29173/pandpr1981819818Debating Phenomenological Research MethodsLinda FinlayPhenomenological researchers generally agree that our central concern is to return to embodied, experiential meanings aiming for a fresh, complex, rich description of a phenomenon as it is concretely lived. Yet debates abound when it comes to deciding how best to carry out this phenomenological research in practice. Confusion about how to conduct appropriate phenomenological research makes our field difficult for novices to access. Six particular questions are contested: (1) How tightly or loosely should we define what counts as "phenomenology" (2) Should we always aim to produce a general (normative) description of the phenomenon, or is idiographic analysis a legitimate aim? (3) To what extent should interpretation be involved in our descriptions? (4) Should we set aside or bring to the foreground researcher subjectivity? (5) Should phenomenology be more science than art? (6) Is phenomenology a modernist or postmodernist project, or neither? In this paper, I examine each of these areas of contention in the spirit of fostering dialogue, and promoting openness and clarity in phenomenological inquiry.https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/pandpr/index.php/pandpr/article/view/19818hermeneutic phenomenology
spellingShingle Linda Finlay
Debating Phenomenological Research Methods
Phenomenology & Practice
hermeneutic phenomenology
title Debating Phenomenological Research Methods
title_full Debating Phenomenological Research Methods
title_fullStr Debating Phenomenological Research Methods
title_full_unstemmed Debating Phenomenological Research Methods
title_short Debating Phenomenological Research Methods
title_sort debating phenomenological research methods
topic hermeneutic phenomenology
url https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/pandpr/index.php/pandpr/article/view/19818
work_keys_str_mv AT lindafinlay debatingphenomenologicalresearchmethods