Evaluation of Acute and Chronic Back Pain After Spinal Anesthesia in Midline and Paramedian Approach: Incidence and Functional Disability

Background: The intensity of low back pain and functional disability in life is a common question of patients before spinal anesthesia. We aimed to compare acute and chronic back pain after spinal anesthesia in midline and paramedian approach. Methods: Two hundred twenty patients elective patients (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Reza Khajavi, Farhad Alavi, Reza Shariat Moharari, Farhad Etezadi, Farsad Imani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2018-09-01
Series:Archives of Anesthesia and Critical Care
Subjects:
Online Access:https://aacc.tums.ac.ir/index.php/aacc/article/view/206
_version_ 1818471580077916160
author Mohammad Reza Khajavi
Farhad Alavi
Reza Shariat Moharari
Farhad Etezadi
Farsad Imani
author_facet Mohammad Reza Khajavi
Farhad Alavi
Reza Shariat Moharari
Farhad Etezadi
Farsad Imani
author_sort Mohammad Reza Khajavi
collection DOAJ
description Background: The intensity of low back pain and functional disability in life is a common question of patients before spinal anesthesia. We aimed to compare acute and chronic back pain after spinal anesthesia in midline and paramedian approach. Methods: Two hundred twenty patients elective patients (25-65 year old) candidates for general, and urological surgery under spinal anesthesia, were allocated into the following two groups: Group M (midline) and Group P (paramedian). Spinal anesthesia was performed with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% in the sitting position using a 25G Quincke needle in L3/L4 orL4/L5 level. During the operation, patients were placed in the supine position. The questionnaire assessed back pain and severity of pain with VAS score three days after spinal anesthesia. If the patients complained of back pain then, the effect of back pain on quality of life and the degree of patient's functional disability were assessed by Oswestry Disability Index on,45 and 90 days after surgery. Results: Forty-one patients (18%) had back pain after the operation, 22 patients were in the paramedian (54%) and 19 patients (46%) in the midline method of spinal anesthesia. (p=0.6). The mean intensity of back pain was 2.27vs1.45 (p=0.5) and the total number of mean functional disability index was less than five in both groups. Conclusion: The incidence of back pain was 18% and was not significantly different between the midline and paramedian methods. The severity of back pain decreased after three days, reaching to less than one on day the 45th and 90th, which does not affect daily patient’s functions.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T03:54:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1a01893f2c644e39acd1928ca8457bb7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2423-5849
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T03:54:07Z
publishDate 2018-09-01
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Archives of Anesthesia and Critical Care
spelling doaj.art-1a01893f2c644e39acd1928ca8457bb72022-12-22T02:13:53ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesArchives of Anesthesia and Critical Care2423-58492018-09-0144Evaluation of Acute and Chronic Back Pain After Spinal Anesthesia in Midline and Paramedian Approach: Incidence and Functional DisabilityMohammad Reza Khajavi0Farhad Alavi1Reza Shariat Moharari2Farhad Etezadi3Farsad Imani4Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.Background: The intensity of low back pain and functional disability in life is a common question of patients before spinal anesthesia. We aimed to compare acute and chronic back pain after spinal anesthesia in midline and paramedian approach. Methods: Two hundred twenty patients elective patients (25-65 year old) candidates for general, and urological surgery under spinal anesthesia, were allocated into the following two groups: Group M (midline) and Group P (paramedian). Spinal anesthesia was performed with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% in the sitting position using a 25G Quincke needle in L3/L4 orL4/L5 level. During the operation, patients were placed in the supine position. The questionnaire assessed back pain and severity of pain with VAS score three days after spinal anesthesia. If the patients complained of back pain then, the effect of back pain on quality of life and the degree of patient's functional disability were assessed by Oswestry Disability Index on,45 and 90 days after surgery. Results: Forty-one patients (18%) had back pain after the operation, 22 patients were in the paramedian (54%) and 19 patients (46%) in the midline method of spinal anesthesia. (p=0.6). The mean intensity of back pain was 2.27vs1.45 (p=0.5) and the total number of mean functional disability index was less than five in both groups. Conclusion: The incidence of back pain was 18% and was not significantly different between the midline and paramedian methods. The severity of back pain decreased after three days, reaching to less than one on day the 45th and 90th, which does not affect daily patient’s functions.https://aacc.tums.ac.ir/index.php/aacc/article/view/206spinal anesthesiaback painmidlineparamedian
spellingShingle Mohammad Reza Khajavi
Farhad Alavi
Reza Shariat Moharari
Farhad Etezadi
Farsad Imani
Evaluation of Acute and Chronic Back Pain After Spinal Anesthesia in Midline and Paramedian Approach: Incidence and Functional Disability
Archives of Anesthesia and Critical Care
spinal anesthesia
back pain
midline
paramedian
title Evaluation of Acute and Chronic Back Pain After Spinal Anesthesia in Midline and Paramedian Approach: Incidence and Functional Disability
title_full Evaluation of Acute and Chronic Back Pain After Spinal Anesthesia in Midline and Paramedian Approach: Incidence and Functional Disability
title_fullStr Evaluation of Acute and Chronic Back Pain After Spinal Anesthesia in Midline and Paramedian Approach: Incidence and Functional Disability
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Acute and Chronic Back Pain After Spinal Anesthesia in Midline and Paramedian Approach: Incidence and Functional Disability
title_short Evaluation of Acute and Chronic Back Pain After Spinal Anesthesia in Midline and Paramedian Approach: Incidence and Functional Disability
title_sort evaluation of acute and chronic back pain after spinal anesthesia in midline and paramedian approach incidence and functional disability
topic spinal anesthesia
back pain
midline
paramedian
url https://aacc.tums.ac.ir/index.php/aacc/article/view/206
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadrezakhajavi evaluationofacuteandchronicbackpainafterspinalanesthesiainmidlineandparamedianapproachincidenceandfunctionaldisability
AT farhadalavi evaluationofacuteandchronicbackpainafterspinalanesthesiainmidlineandparamedianapproachincidenceandfunctionaldisability
AT rezashariatmoharari evaluationofacuteandchronicbackpainafterspinalanesthesiainmidlineandparamedianapproachincidenceandfunctionaldisability
AT farhadetezadi evaluationofacuteandchronicbackpainafterspinalanesthesiainmidlineandparamedianapproachincidenceandfunctionaldisability
AT farsadimani evaluationofacuteandchronicbackpainafterspinalanesthesiainmidlineandparamedianapproachincidenceandfunctionaldisability