Lessons learned: Linking patient-reported outcomes data with administrative databases

Introduction Since 2007, Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) has systematically collected patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the form of symptom data, for cancer outpatients visiting regional cancer centres or affiliate institutions. Data are used in real-time to facilitate conversation between clinicians an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura Davis, Alyson Mahar, Lev Bubis, Qing Li, Haoyu Zhao, Lesley Moody, Rinku Sutradhar, Lisa Barbera, Natalie Coburn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Swansea University 2018-09-01
Series:International Journal of Population Data Science
Online Access:https://ijpds.org/article/view/824
_version_ 1827613145539018752
author Laura Davis
Alyson Mahar
Lev Bubis
Qing Li
Haoyu Zhao
Lesley Moody
Rinku Sutradhar
Lisa Barbera
Natalie Coburn
author_facet Laura Davis
Alyson Mahar
Lev Bubis
Qing Li
Haoyu Zhao
Lesley Moody
Rinku Sutradhar
Lisa Barbera
Natalie Coburn
author_sort Laura Davis
collection DOAJ
description Introduction Since 2007, Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) has systematically collected patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the form of symptom data, for cancer outpatients visiting regional cancer centres or affiliate institutions. Data are used in real-time to facilitate conversation between clinicians and patients and have recently been combined with provincial administrative databases. Objectives and Approach CCO collects PROs using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), which scores 9 symptoms on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst symptom severity). Data were imported from CCO in 2015 and linked to a cancer cohort at ICES. We investigated differences between patients who completed $\geq$1 ESAS record and patients who did not, as well as the number of records, timing of data collection and missingness. We describe our experience linking and using the PRO data to administrative data, including presenting trajectories of symptoms over time and combining scores into composite indices. Results 120,745 cancer patients had 729,861 symptom records between 2007 and 2014. Not all patients with a cancer diagnosis had $\geq$1 ESAS record and this varied by patient, disease and system level factors. Because implementation occurred from a clinical perspective, data collection was irregular within and across patients and depended on treatment and other factors; the number of records per patient varied, as well the number of contributing patients in each time period following diagnosis. Attempts were made to create meaningful composite indices by combining all symptom scores as well as combining multiple high scores for each individual symptom. As a result, selecting the best statistical analysis to use these PRO data as an exposure or outcome is still uncertain. Conclusion/Implications PRO data linked to provincial, administrative data holdings represent a new frontier for population-based cancer research, both in their challenging structure as well as their implications for clinical practice and health system. These lessons learned will hopefully support other researchers rigorous use of these data in the future.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T08:34:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1a07564473bc4e77b4bdab8616960ab6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2399-4908
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T08:34:40Z
publishDate 2018-09-01
publisher Swansea University
record_format Article
series International Journal of Population Data Science
spelling doaj.art-1a07564473bc4e77b4bdab8616960ab62023-12-02T18:21:50ZengSwansea UniversityInternational Journal of Population Data Science2399-49082018-09-013410.23889/ijpds.v3i4.824824Lessons learned: Linking patient-reported outcomes data with administrative databasesLaura Davis0Alyson Mahar1Lev Bubis2Qing Li3Haoyu Zhao4Lesley Moody5Rinku Sutradhar6Lisa Barbera7Natalie Coburn8Sunnybrook Research InstituteManitoba Centre for Health PolicySunnybrook Health SciencesInstitute of Clinical Evaluative SciencesInstitute of Clinical Evaluative SciencesCancer Care OntarioInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesOdette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreOdette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreIntroduction Since 2007, Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) has systematically collected patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the form of symptom data, for cancer outpatients visiting regional cancer centres or affiliate institutions. Data are used in real-time to facilitate conversation between clinicians and patients and have recently been combined with provincial administrative databases. Objectives and Approach CCO collects PROs using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS), which scores 9 symptoms on a scale of 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst symptom severity). Data were imported from CCO in 2015 and linked to a cancer cohort at ICES. We investigated differences between patients who completed $\geq$1 ESAS record and patients who did not, as well as the number of records, timing of data collection and missingness. We describe our experience linking and using the PRO data to administrative data, including presenting trajectories of symptoms over time and combining scores into composite indices. Results 120,745 cancer patients had 729,861 symptom records between 2007 and 2014. Not all patients with a cancer diagnosis had $\geq$1 ESAS record and this varied by patient, disease and system level factors. Because implementation occurred from a clinical perspective, data collection was irregular within and across patients and depended on treatment and other factors; the number of records per patient varied, as well the number of contributing patients in each time period following diagnosis. Attempts were made to create meaningful composite indices by combining all symptom scores as well as combining multiple high scores for each individual symptom. As a result, selecting the best statistical analysis to use these PRO data as an exposure or outcome is still uncertain. Conclusion/Implications PRO data linked to provincial, administrative data holdings represent a new frontier for population-based cancer research, both in their challenging structure as well as their implications for clinical practice and health system. These lessons learned will hopefully support other researchers rigorous use of these data in the future.https://ijpds.org/article/view/824
spellingShingle Laura Davis
Alyson Mahar
Lev Bubis
Qing Li
Haoyu Zhao
Lesley Moody
Rinku Sutradhar
Lisa Barbera
Natalie Coburn
Lessons learned: Linking patient-reported outcomes data with administrative databases
International Journal of Population Data Science
title Lessons learned: Linking patient-reported outcomes data with administrative databases
title_full Lessons learned: Linking patient-reported outcomes data with administrative databases
title_fullStr Lessons learned: Linking patient-reported outcomes data with administrative databases
title_full_unstemmed Lessons learned: Linking patient-reported outcomes data with administrative databases
title_short Lessons learned: Linking patient-reported outcomes data with administrative databases
title_sort lessons learned linking patient reported outcomes data with administrative databases
url https://ijpds.org/article/view/824
work_keys_str_mv AT lauradavis lessonslearnedlinkingpatientreportedoutcomesdatawithadministrativedatabases
AT alysonmahar lessonslearnedlinkingpatientreportedoutcomesdatawithadministrativedatabases
AT levbubis lessonslearnedlinkingpatientreportedoutcomesdatawithadministrativedatabases
AT qingli lessonslearnedlinkingpatientreportedoutcomesdatawithadministrativedatabases
AT haoyuzhao lessonslearnedlinkingpatientreportedoutcomesdatawithadministrativedatabases
AT lesleymoody lessonslearnedlinkingpatientreportedoutcomesdatawithadministrativedatabases
AT rinkusutradhar lessonslearnedlinkingpatientreportedoutcomesdatawithadministrativedatabases
AT lisabarbera lessonslearnedlinkingpatientreportedoutcomesdatawithadministrativedatabases
AT nataliecoburn lessonslearnedlinkingpatientreportedoutcomesdatawithadministrativedatabases