Tidal volume challenge to predict preload responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome under prone position
Abstract Background Prone position is frequently used in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), especially during the Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Our study investigated the ability of pulse pressure variation (PPV) and its changes during a tidal volume challenge (TVC) to as...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2022-07-01
|
| Series: | Critical Care |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04087-w |
| _version_ | 1818509861520932864 |
|---|---|
| author | Rui Shi Soufia Ayed Francesca Moretto Danila Azzolina Nello De Vita Francesco Gavelli Simone Carelli Arthur Pavot Christopher Lai Xavier Monnet Jean-Louis Teboul |
| author_facet | Rui Shi Soufia Ayed Francesca Moretto Danila Azzolina Nello De Vita Francesco Gavelli Simone Carelli Arthur Pavot Christopher Lai Xavier Monnet Jean-Louis Teboul |
| author_sort | Rui Shi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background Prone position is frequently used in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), especially during the Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Our study investigated the ability of pulse pressure variation (PPV) and its changes during a tidal volume challenge (TVC) to assess preload responsiveness in ARDS patients under prone position. Methods This was a prospective study conducted in a 25-bed intensive care unit at a university hospital. We included patients with ARDS under prone position, ventilated with 6 mL/kg tidal volume and monitored by a transpulmonary thermodilution device. We measured PPV and its changes during a TVC (ΔPPV TVC6–8) after increasing the tidal volume from 6 to 8 mL/kg for one minute. Changes in cardiac index (CI) during a Trendelenburg maneuver (ΔCITREND) and during end-expiratory occlusion (EEO) at 8 mL/kg tidal volume (ΔCI EEO8) were recorded. Preload responsiveness was defined by both ΔCITREND ≥ 8% and ΔCI EEO8 ≥ 5%. Preload unresponsiveness was defined by both ΔCITREND < 8% and ΔCI EEO8 < 5%. Results Eighty-four sets of measurements were analyzed in 58 patients. Before prone positioning, the ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen was 104 ± 27 mmHg. At the inclusion time, patients were under prone position for 11 (2–14) hours. Norepinephrine was administered in 83% of cases with a dose of 0.25 (0.15–0.42) µg/kg/min. The positive end-expiratory pressure was 14 (11–16) cmH2O. The driving pressure was 12 (10–17) cmH2O, and the respiratory system compliance was 32 (22–40) mL/cmH2O. Preload responsiveness was detected in 42 cases. An absolute change in PPV ≥ 3.5% during a TVC assessed preload responsiveness with an area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve of 0.94 ± 0.03 (sensitivity: 98%, specificity: 86%) better than that of baseline PPV (0.85 ± 0.05; p = 0.047). In the 56 cases where baseline PPV was inconclusive (≥ 4% and < 11%), ΔPPV TVC6–8 ≥ 3.5% still enabled to reliably assess preload responsiveness (AUROC: 0.91 ± 0.05, sensitivity: 97%, specificity: 81%; p < 0.01 vs. baseline PPV). Conclusion In patients with ARDS under low tidal volume ventilation during prone position, the changes in PPV during a TVC can reliably assess preload responsiveness without the need for cardiac output measurements. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04457739). Registered 30 June 2020 —Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT04457739 |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-10T22:51:13Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-1a0f23240941429aaea8be1367122d69 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1364-8535 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-10T22:51:13Z |
| publishDate | 2022-07-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Critical Care |
| spelling | doaj.art-1a0f23240941429aaea8be1367122d692022-12-22T01:30:23ZengBMCCritical Care1364-85352022-07-0126111010.1186/s13054-022-04087-wTidal volume challenge to predict preload responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome under prone positionRui Shi0Soufia Ayed1Francesca Moretto2Danila Azzolina3Nello De Vita4Francesco Gavelli5Simone Carelli6Arthur Pavot7Christopher Lai8Xavier Monnet9Jean-Louis Teboul10Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, INSERM UMR_S999, Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HPService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, INSERM UMR_S999, Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HPService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, INSERM UMR_S999, Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HPDepartment of Environmental and Preventive Science, University of FerraraService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, INSERM UMR_S999, Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HPService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, INSERM UMR_S999, Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HPService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, INSERM UMR_S999, Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HPService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, INSERM UMR_S999, Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HPService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, INSERM UMR_S999, Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HPService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, INSERM UMR_S999, Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HPService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay, INSERM UMR_S999, Université Paris-Saclay, AP-HPAbstract Background Prone position is frequently used in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), especially during the Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Our study investigated the ability of pulse pressure variation (PPV) and its changes during a tidal volume challenge (TVC) to assess preload responsiveness in ARDS patients under prone position. Methods This was a prospective study conducted in a 25-bed intensive care unit at a university hospital. We included patients with ARDS under prone position, ventilated with 6 mL/kg tidal volume and monitored by a transpulmonary thermodilution device. We measured PPV and its changes during a TVC (ΔPPV TVC6–8) after increasing the tidal volume from 6 to 8 mL/kg for one minute. Changes in cardiac index (CI) during a Trendelenburg maneuver (ΔCITREND) and during end-expiratory occlusion (EEO) at 8 mL/kg tidal volume (ΔCI EEO8) were recorded. Preload responsiveness was defined by both ΔCITREND ≥ 8% and ΔCI EEO8 ≥ 5%. Preload unresponsiveness was defined by both ΔCITREND < 8% and ΔCI EEO8 < 5%. Results Eighty-four sets of measurements were analyzed in 58 patients. Before prone positioning, the ratio of partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen was 104 ± 27 mmHg. At the inclusion time, patients were under prone position for 11 (2–14) hours. Norepinephrine was administered in 83% of cases with a dose of 0.25 (0.15–0.42) µg/kg/min. The positive end-expiratory pressure was 14 (11–16) cmH2O. The driving pressure was 12 (10–17) cmH2O, and the respiratory system compliance was 32 (22–40) mL/cmH2O. Preload responsiveness was detected in 42 cases. An absolute change in PPV ≥ 3.5% during a TVC assessed preload responsiveness with an area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve of 0.94 ± 0.03 (sensitivity: 98%, specificity: 86%) better than that of baseline PPV (0.85 ± 0.05; p = 0.047). In the 56 cases where baseline PPV was inconclusive (≥ 4% and < 11%), ΔPPV TVC6–8 ≥ 3.5% still enabled to reliably assess preload responsiveness (AUROC: 0.91 ± 0.05, sensitivity: 97%, specificity: 81%; p < 0.01 vs. baseline PPV). Conclusion In patients with ARDS under low tidal volume ventilation during prone position, the changes in PPV during a TVC can reliably assess preload responsiveness without the need for cardiac output measurements. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04457739). Registered 30 June 2020 —Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT04457739https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04087-wPulse pressure variationFluid responsivenessARDSEnd-expiratory occlusion test |
| spellingShingle | Rui Shi Soufia Ayed Francesca Moretto Danila Azzolina Nello De Vita Francesco Gavelli Simone Carelli Arthur Pavot Christopher Lai Xavier Monnet Jean-Louis Teboul Tidal volume challenge to predict preload responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome under prone position Critical Care Pulse pressure variation Fluid responsiveness ARDS End-expiratory occlusion test |
| title | Tidal volume challenge to predict preload responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome under prone position |
| title_full | Tidal volume challenge to predict preload responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome under prone position |
| title_fullStr | Tidal volume challenge to predict preload responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome under prone position |
| title_full_unstemmed | Tidal volume challenge to predict preload responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome under prone position |
| title_short | Tidal volume challenge to predict preload responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome under prone position |
| title_sort | tidal volume challenge to predict preload responsiveness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome under prone position |
| topic | Pulse pressure variation Fluid responsiveness ARDS End-expiratory occlusion test |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04087-w |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ruishi tidalvolumechallengetopredictpreloadresponsivenessinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeunderproneposition AT soufiaayed tidalvolumechallengetopredictpreloadresponsivenessinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeunderproneposition AT francescamoretto tidalvolumechallengetopredictpreloadresponsivenessinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeunderproneposition AT danilaazzolina tidalvolumechallengetopredictpreloadresponsivenessinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeunderproneposition AT nellodevita tidalvolumechallengetopredictpreloadresponsivenessinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeunderproneposition AT francescogavelli tidalvolumechallengetopredictpreloadresponsivenessinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeunderproneposition AT simonecarelli tidalvolumechallengetopredictpreloadresponsivenessinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeunderproneposition AT arthurpavot tidalvolumechallengetopredictpreloadresponsivenessinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeunderproneposition AT christopherlai tidalvolumechallengetopredictpreloadresponsivenessinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeunderproneposition AT xaviermonnet tidalvolumechallengetopredictpreloadresponsivenessinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeunderproneposition AT jeanlouisteboul tidalvolumechallengetopredictpreloadresponsivenessinpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeunderproneposition |