Review of participation of Indigenous peoples in plastics pollution governance

While calls for Indigenous participation in plastics pollution governance are increasingly common, exactly what participation means remains unclear. This review investigates how English-language peer-reviewed and gray literature describe Indigenous participation and its barriers and analyzes the dom...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Max Liboiron, Riley Cotter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2023-01-01
Series:Cambridge Prisms: Plastics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2755094X23000160/type/journal_article
_version_ 1797665387400134656
author Max Liboiron
Riley Cotter
author_facet Max Liboiron
Riley Cotter
author_sort Max Liboiron
collection DOAJ
description While calls for Indigenous participation in plastics pollution governance are increasingly common, exactly what participation means remains unclear. This review investigates how English-language peer-reviewed and gray literature describe Indigenous participation and its barriers and analyzes the dominant terms, models, enactments, and theories of Indigenous participation in plastics pollution work. We find that different actors – Indigenous people and organizations, non-Indigenous authors, mixed collaborations, and settler governments and NGOs – are talking about participation in acutely different ways. Non-Indigenous actors tend to focus on the inclusion of Indigenous people, either as data, knowledge, or a presence in existing frameworks. Mixed Indigenous and non-Indigenous author groups focus on partnership and collaboration, though with significant diversity in terms of what modes of decision-making, rights, and leadership these collaborations entail. Indigenous authors and organization advocate for participation premised on Indigenous rights, sovereignty, creation, and leadership. We end by characterizing Indigenous Environmental Justice (IEJ) in the literature. IEJ provides a notably unique way of understanding and intervening in plastics pollution. The text is designed so researchers and organizers can be more specific, deliberate, and just in the way Indigenous peoples participate in plastic pollution research, initiatives, and governance.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T19:43:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1a1786726fc943758b742c84de48e837
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2755-094X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T19:43:08Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Cambridge Prisms: Plastics
spelling doaj.art-1a1786726fc943758b742c84de48e8372023-10-06T03:37:14ZengCambridge University PressCambridge Prisms: Plastics2755-094X2023-01-01110.1017/plc.2023.16Review of participation of Indigenous peoples in plastics pollution governanceMax Liboiron0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3837-8650Riley Cotter1Department of Geography, Memorial University of Newfoundland and Labrador, St. John’s, NL, CanadaDepartment of Geography, Memorial University of Newfoundland and Labrador, St. John’s, NL, CanadaWhile calls for Indigenous participation in plastics pollution governance are increasingly common, exactly what participation means remains unclear. This review investigates how English-language peer-reviewed and gray literature describe Indigenous participation and its barriers and analyzes the dominant terms, models, enactments, and theories of Indigenous participation in plastics pollution work. We find that different actors – Indigenous people and organizations, non-Indigenous authors, mixed collaborations, and settler governments and NGOs – are talking about participation in acutely different ways. Non-Indigenous actors tend to focus on the inclusion of Indigenous people, either as data, knowledge, or a presence in existing frameworks. Mixed Indigenous and non-Indigenous author groups focus on partnership and collaboration, though with significant diversity in terms of what modes of decision-making, rights, and leadership these collaborations entail. Indigenous authors and organization advocate for participation premised on Indigenous rights, sovereignty, creation, and leadership. We end by characterizing Indigenous Environmental Justice (IEJ) in the literature. IEJ provides a notably unique way of understanding and intervening in plastics pollution. The text is designed so researchers and organizers can be more specific, deliberate, and just in the way Indigenous peoples participate in plastic pollution research, initiatives, and governance.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2755094X23000160/type/journal_articleplasticsendocrine disrupting compoundsIndigenous Environmental Justiceinclusionsovereignty
spellingShingle Max Liboiron
Riley Cotter
Review of participation of Indigenous peoples in plastics pollution governance
Cambridge Prisms: Plastics
plastics
endocrine disrupting compounds
Indigenous Environmental Justice
inclusion
sovereignty
title Review of participation of Indigenous peoples in plastics pollution governance
title_full Review of participation of Indigenous peoples in plastics pollution governance
title_fullStr Review of participation of Indigenous peoples in plastics pollution governance
title_full_unstemmed Review of participation of Indigenous peoples in plastics pollution governance
title_short Review of participation of Indigenous peoples in plastics pollution governance
title_sort review of participation of indigenous peoples in plastics pollution governance
topic plastics
endocrine disrupting compounds
Indigenous Environmental Justice
inclusion
sovereignty
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2755094X23000160/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT maxliboiron reviewofparticipationofindigenouspeoplesinplasticspollutiongovernance
AT rileycotter reviewofparticipationofindigenouspeoplesinplasticspollutiongovernance