Polarizing T and B cell responses by APC-targeted subunit vaccines.

Current influenza vaccines mostly aim at the induction of specific neutralizing antibodies. While antibodies are important for protection against a particular virus strain, T cells can recognize epitopes that will offer broader protection against influenza. We have previously developed a DNA vaccine...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gunnveig eGrødeland, Even eFossum, Bjarne eBogen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Immunology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fimmu.2015.00367/full
_version_ 1818263765590736896
author Gunnveig eGrødeland
Even eFossum
Bjarne eBogen
Bjarne eBogen
author_facet Gunnveig eGrødeland
Even eFossum
Bjarne eBogen
Bjarne eBogen
author_sort Gunnveig eGrødeland
collection DOAJ
description Current influenza vaccines mostly aim at the induction of specific neutralizing antibodies. While antibodies are important for protection against a particular virus strain, T cells can recognize epitopes that will offer broader protection against influenza. We have previously developed a DNA vaccine format by which protein antigens can be targeted specifically to receptors on antigen presenting cells (APCs). The DNA-encoded vaccine proteins are homodimers, each chain consisting of a targeting unit, a dimerization unit, and an antigen. The strategy of targeting antigen to APCs greatly enhances immune responses as compared to non-targeted controls. Furthermore, targeting of antigen to different receptors on APCs can polarize the immune response to different arms of immunity. Here, we discuss how targeting of hemagglutinin (HA) to MHC class II molecules increases Th2 and IgG1 antibody responses, whereas targeting to chemokine receptors XCR1 or CCR1/3/5 increases Th1 and IgG2a responses, in addition to CD8+ T cell responses. We also discuss these results in relation to work published by others on APC-targeting. Differential targeting of APC surface molecules may allow the induction of tailor-made phenotypes of adaptive immune responses that are optimal for protection against various infectious agents, including influenza virus.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T19:24:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1a233e6c8f6e4eb7aaf9439d89a03553
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-3224
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T19:24:13Z
publishDate 2015-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Immunology
spelling doaj.art-1a233e6c8f6e4eb7aaf9439d89a035532022-12-22T00:14:32ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Immunology1664-32242015-07-01610.3389/fimmu.2015.00367145930Polarizing T and B cell responses by APC-targeted subunit vaccines.Gunnveig eGrødeland0Even eFossum1Bjarne eBogen2Bjarne eBogen3Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo and Oslo University HospitalDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo and Oslo University HospitalDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo and Oslo University HospitalInstitute of Immunology, University of OsloCurrent influenza vaccines mostly aim at the induction of specific neutralizing antibodies. While antibodies are important for protection against a particular virus strain, T cells can recognize epitopes that will offer broader protection against influenza. We have previously developed a DNA vaccine format by which protein antigens can be targeted specifically to receptors on antigen presenting cells (APCs). The DNA-encoded vaccine proteins are homodimers, each chain consisting of a targeting unit, a dimerization unit, and an antigen. The strategy of targeting antigen to APCs greatly enhances immune responses as compared to non-targeted controls. Furthermore, targeting of antigen to different receptors on APCs can polarize the immune response to different arms of immunity. Here, we discuss how targeting of hemagglutinin (HA) to MHC class II molecules increases Th2 and IgG1 antibody responses, whereas targeting to chemokine receptors XCR1 or CCR1/3/5 increases Th1 and IgG2a responses, in addition to CD8+ T cell responses. We also discuss these results in relation to work published by others on APC-targeting. Differential targeting of APC surface molecules may allow the induction of tailor-made phenotypes of adaptive immune responses that are optimal for protection against various infectious agents, including influenza virus.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fimmu.2015.00367/fullInfluenza VaccinesT cellsVaccineantibodyTh1th2
spellingShingle Gunnveig eGrødeland
Even eFossum
Bjarne eBogen
Bjarne eBogen
Polarizing T and B cell responses by APC-targeted subunit vaccines.
Frontiers in Immunology
Influenza Vaccines
T cells
Vaccine
antibody
Th1
th2
title Polarizing T and B cell responses by APC-targeted subunit vaccines.
title_full Polarizing T and B cell responses by APC-targeted subunit vaccines.
title_fullStr Polarizing T and B cell responses by APC-targeted subunit vaccines.
title_full_unstemmed Polarizing T and B cell responses by APC-targeted subunit vaccines.
title_short Polarizing T and B cell responses by APC-targeted subunit vaccines.
title_sort polarizing t and b cell responses by apc targeted subunit vaccines
topic Influenza Vaccines
T cells
Vaccine
antibody
Th1
th2
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fimmu.2015.00367/full
work_keys_str_mv AT gunnveigegrødeland polarizingtandbcellresponsesbyapctargetedsubunitvaccines
AT evenefossum polarizingtandbcellresponsesbyapctargetedsubunitvaccines
AT bjarneebogen polarizingtandbcellresponsesbyapctargetedsubunitvaccines
AT bjarneebogen polarizingtandbcellresponsesbyapctargetedsubunitvaccines