A comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage

Abstract Background There is a growing interest in minimally invasive left atrial appendage closure therapies. However, for successful catheter surgery, it is necessary to achieve high-quality postoperative recovery. The aim of the study is to comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qiongzhen Li, Haixia Yao, Jingxiang Wu, Meiying Xu, Hong Xie, Dongjin Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-08-01
Series:Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01936-1
_version_ 1817999015459946496
author Qiongzhen Li
Haixia Yao
Jingxiang Wu
Meiying Xu
Hong Xie
Dongjin Wu
author_facet Qiongzhen Li
Haixia Yao
Jingxiang Wu
Meiying Xu
Hong Xie
Dongjin Wu
author_sort Qiongzhen Li
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background There is a growing interest in minimally invasive left atrial appendage closure therapies. However, for successful catheter surgery, it is necessary to achieve high-quality postoperative recovery. The aim of the study is to comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage. Methods Eighty-four patients who received percutaneous LAAC were randomly placed into two groups, general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation with either propofol-remifentanil-cisatracurium-neostigmine (group C) or propofol-remifentanil-rocuronium-sugammadex (group S). The QoR-40 questionnaire was used to assess recovery quality 6 h after surgery, and the time of spontaneous respiration, the time of consciousness recovery, the time of extubation, the duration in the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU), and the adverse events after awakening were collected. Results Compared with the group C, the group S demonstrated significantly higher individual QoR-40 dimension scores, a significantly shorter recovery time for spontaneous respiration and consciousness, time of extubation, and duration in the PACU, and a lower incidence of transient hypoxemia, agitation, nausea and vomiting and urinary retention. There was a non-significant trend for the length of stay in the hospital in both groups. Conclusions General anesthesia and endotracheal intubation with propofol-remifentanil-rocuronium-sugammadex provided better quality of recovery, shorter anaesthesia duration, and lower incidence of hypoxemia and agitation. Neuromuscular blockade and reversal using rocuronium and sugamadex is better than with cisatricurium and neostigmine on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage. Trial registration: chictr.org, ChiCTR2000031857. Registered on April 12, 2020.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T03:02:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1a250febb0384d05acff722ee47f180d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-8090
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T03:02:14Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
spelling doaj.art-1a250febb0384d05acff722ee47f180d2022-12-22T02:15:52ZengBMCJournal of Cardiothoracic Surgery1749-80902022-08-011711710.1186/s13019-022-01936-1A comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendageQiongzhen Li0Haixia Yao1Jingxiang Wu2Meiying Xu3Hong Xie4Dongjin Wu5Department of Anesthesia, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology of Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology of Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology of Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong UniversityDepartment of Anesthesia, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversityDepartment of Anesthesiology of Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong UniversityAbstract Background There is a growing interest in minimally invasive left atrial appendage closure therapies. However, for successful catheter surgery, it is necessary to achieve high-quality postoperative recovery. The aim of the study is to comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage. Methods Eighty-four patients who received percutaneous LAAC were randomly placed into two groups, general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation with either propofol-remifentanil-cisatracurium-neostigmine (group C) or propofol-remifentanil-rocuronium-sugammadex (group S). The QoR-40 questionnaire was used to assess recovery quality 6 h after surgery, and the time of spontaneous respiration, the time of consciousness recovery, the time of extubation, the duration in the postanaesthesia care unit (PACU), and the adverse events after awakening were collected. Results Compared with the group C, the group S demonstrated significantly higher individual QoR-40 dimension scores, a significantly shorter recovery time for spontaneous respiration and consciousness, time of extubation, and duration in the PACU, and a lower incidence of transient hypoxemia, agitation, nausea and vomiting and urinary retention. There was a non-significant trend for the length of stay in the hospital in both groups. Conclusions General anesthesia and endotracheal intubation with propofol-remifentanil-rocuronium-sugammadex provided better quality of recovery, shorter anaesthesia duration, and lower incidence of hypoxemia and agitation. Neuromuscular blockade and reversal using rocuronium and sugamadex is better than with cisatricurium and neostigmine on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage. Trial registration: chictr.org, ChiCTR2000031857. Registered on April 12, 2020.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01936-1Left atrial appendage closureRocuroniumSugammadexCisatracurium
spellingShingle Qiongzhen Li
Haixia Yao
Jingxiang Wu
Meiying Xu
Hong Xie
Dongjin Wu
A comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Left atrial appendage closure
Rocuronium
Sugammadex
Cisatracurium
title A comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage
title_full A comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage
title_fullStr A comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage
title_short A comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage
title_sort comparison of neuromuscular blockade and reversal using cisatricurium and neostigmine with rocuronium and sugamadex on the quality of recovery from general anaesthesia for percutaneous closure of left atria appendage
topic Left atrial appendage closure
Rocuronium
Sugammadex
Cisatracurium
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01936-1
work_keys_str_mv AT qiongzhenli acomparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage
AT haixiayao acomparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage
AT jingxiangwu acomparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage
AT meiyingxu acomparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage
AT hongxie acomparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage
AT dongjinwu acomparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage
AT qiongzhenli comparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage
AT haixiayao comparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage
AT jingxiangwu comparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage
AT meiyingxu comparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage
AT hongxie comparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage
AT dongjinwu comparisonofneuromuscularblockadeandreversalusingcisatricuriumandneostigminewithrocuroniumandsugamadexonthequalityofrecoveryfromgeneralanaesthesiaforpercutaneousclosureofleftatriaappendage