What is the resource footprint of a computer science department? Place, people, and Pedagogy

Internet and Communication Technology/electrical and electronic equipment (ICT/EEE) form the bedrock of today’s knowledge economy. This increasingly interconnected web of products, processes, services, and infrastructure is often invisible to the user, as are the resource costs behind them. This eco...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: I. S. Mian, D. Twisleton, D. A. Timm
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2020-01-01
Series:Data & Policy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2632324920000127/type/journal_article
_version_ 1811156476602875904
author I. S. Mian
D. Twisleton
D. A. Timm
author_facet I. S. Mian
D. Twisleton
D. A. Timm
author_sort I. S. Mian
collection DOAJ
description Internet and Communication Technology/electrical and electronic equipment (ICT/EEE) form the bedrock of today’s knowledge economy. This increasingly interconnected web of products, processes, services, and infrastructure is often invisible to the user, as are the resource costs behind them. This ecosystem of machine-to-machine and cyber-physical-system technologies has a myriad of (in)direct impacts on the lithosphere, biosphere, atmosphere, and hydrosphere. As key determinants of tomorrow’s digital world, academic institutions are critical sites for exploring ways to mitigate and/or eliminate negative impacts. This Report is a self-deliberation provoked by the question How do we create more resilient and healthier computer science departments: living laboratories for teaching and learning about resource-constrained computing, computation, and communication? Our response for University College London (UCL) Computer Science is to reflect on how, when, and where resources—energy, (raw) materials including water, space, and time—are consumed by the building (place), its occupants (people), and their activities (pedagogy). This perspective and attendant first-of-its-kind assessment outlines a roadmap and proposes high-level principles to aid our efforts, describing challenges and difficulties hindering quantification of the Department’s resource footprint. Qualitatively, we find a need to rematerialise the ICT/EEE ecosystem: to reveal the full costs of the seemingly intangible information society by interrogating the entire life history of paraphernalia from smartphones through servers to underground/undersea cables; another approach is demonstrating the corporeality of commonplace phrases and Nature-inspired terms such as artificial intelligence, social media, Big Data, smart cities/farming, the Internet, the Cloud, and the Web. We sketch routes to realising three interlinked aims: cap annual power consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, become a zero waste institution, and rejuvenate and (re)integrate the natural and built environments.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:52:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1a2b7cf57fa744759a76662c46256bb2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2632-3249
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:52:16Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Data & Policy
spelling doaj.art-1a2b7cf57fa744759a76662c46256bb22023-03-09T12:31:28ZengCambridge University PressData & Policy2632-32492020-01-01210.1017/dap.2020.12What is the resource footprint of a computer science department? Place, people, and PedagogyI. S. Mian0D. Twisleton1D. A. Timm2Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United KingdomDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, London, United KingdomDepartment of Computer Science, University College London, London, United KingdomInternet and Communication Technology/electrical and electronic equipment (ICT/EEE) form the bedrock of today’s knowledge economy. This increasingly interconnected web of products, processes, services, and infrastructure is often invisible to the user, as are the resource costs behind them. This ecosystem of machine-to-machine and cyber-physical-system technologies has a myriad of (in)direct impacts on the lithosphere, biosphere, atmosphere, and hydrosphere. As key determinants of tomorrow’s digital world, academic institutions are critical sites for exploring ways to mitigate and/or eliminate negative impacts. This Report is a self-deliberation provoked by the question How do we create more resilient and healthier computer science departments: living laboratories for teaching and learning about resource-constrained computing, computation, and communication? Our response for University College London (UCL) Computer Science is to reflect on how, when, and where resources—energy, (raw) materials including water, space, and time—are consumed by the building (place), its occupants (people), and their activities (pedagogy). This perspective and attendant first-of-its-kind assessment outlines a roadmap and proposes high-level principles to aid our efforts, describing challenges and difficulties hindering quantification of the Department’s resource footprint. Qualitatively, we find a need to rematerialise the ICT/EEE ecosystem: to reveal the full costs of the seemingly intangible information society by interrogating the entire life history of paraphernalia from smartphones through servers to underground/undersea cables; another approach is demonstrating the corporeality of commonplace phrases and Nature-inspired terms such as artificial intelligence, social media, Big Data, smart cities/farming, the Internet, the Cloud, and the Web. We sketch routes to realising three interlinked aims: cap annual power consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, become a zero waste institution, and rejuvenate and (re)integrate the natural and built environments.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2632324920000127/type/journal_articlerejuvenate and (re)integrate the natural and built environmentsrematerialising the information societyresource-constrained computing, computation, and communicationresponsible research and innovationzero waste institutionenvironmental accountingwaste reductiondata centre managementIT infrastructure lifecycleenvironmental policy
spellingShingle I. S. Mian
D. Twisleton
D. A. Timm
What is the resource footprint of a computer science department? Place, people, and Pedagogy
Data & Policy
rejuvenate and (re)integrate the natural and built environments
rematerialising the information society
resource-constrained computing, computation, and communication
responsible research and innovation
zero waste institution
environmental accounting
waste reduction
data centre management
IT infrastructure lifecycle
environmental policy
title What is the resource footprint of a computer science department? Place, people, and Pedagogy
title_full What is the resource footprint of a computer science department? Place, people, and Pedagogy
title_fullStr What is the resource footprint of a computer science department? Place, people, and Pedagogy
title_full_unstemmed What is the resource footprint of a computer science department? Place, people, and Pedagogy
title_short What is the resource footprint of a computer science department? Place, people, and Pedagogy
title_sort what is the resource footprint of a computer science department place people and pedagogy
topic rejuvenate and (re)integrate the natural and built environments
rematerialising the information society
resource-constrained computing, computation, and communication
responsible research and innovation
zero waste institution
environmental accounting
waste reduction
data centre management
IT infrastructure lifecycle
environmental policy
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2632324920000127/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT ismian whatistheresourcefootprintofacomputersciencedepartmentplacepeopleandpedagogy
AT dtwisleton whatistheresourcefootprintofacomputersciencedepartmentplacepeopleandpedagogy
AT datimm whatistheresourcefootprintofacomputersciencedepartmentplacepeopleandpedagogy