Exploring rhetorical moves in a digital academic genre: A cross-disciplinary study of the highlights section

This cross-disciplinary paper explores the ways in which writers promote their research articles in the highlights section of journals available online as a digital academic genre. A corpus of highlights from 300 research articles was randomly selected from journals in two major domains of knowledg...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erdem Akbaş, Maryam Farnia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos 2021-12-01
Series:Ibérica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistaiberica.org/index.php/iberica/article/view/600
_version_ 1797953710020624384
author Erdem Akbaş
Maryam Farnia
author_facet Erdem Akbaş
Maryam Farnia
author_sort Erdem Akbaş
collection DOAJ
description This cross-disciplinary paper explores the ways in which writers promote their research articles in the highlights section of journals available online as a digital academic genre. A corpus of highlights from 300 research articles was randomly selected from journals in two major domains of knowledge, hard sciences and soft sciences. The corpus contained texts from the fields of (1) Chemistry and (2) Computer Science representing hard sciences and from (3) Linguistics and (4) Management representing soft sciences published in reputable journals in 2018 and 2019. The corpus was analysed in terms of the promotional and rhetorical moves based on a model developed by the researchers using the UAM Corpus Tool. The results show that despite similarities in the use of rhetorical moves, for example, Promoting the results (Move 4) as the most frequently used move in both corpora, there were disciplinary variations in the highlights section. Whereas hard science majors give secondary importance to promoting the value (Move 2) of their research, soft science majors promoted the scene of the study (Move 1) in the highlights. Analyses of the cyclical patterns of the highlights reveal that whereas hard sciences researchers combined promoting the results with promoting the methodological issues (Move 3), soft sciences writers showcased their results as well as promoting background information (Move 1) related to their actual research.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T23:06:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1a38aa4100db40a8bf6fc198bbf7f655
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1139-7241
2340-2784
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T23:06:24Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos
record_format Article
series Ibérica
spelling doaj.art-1a38aa4100db40a8bf6fc198bbf7f6552023-01-13T10:56:08ZengAsociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines EspecíficosIbérica1139-72412340-27842021-12-014210.17398/2340-2784.42.85600Exploring rhetorical moves in a digital academic genre: A cross-disciplinary study of the highlights sectionErdem Akbaş0Maryam Farnia1Erciyes UniversityPayame Noor University This cross-disciplinary paper explores the ways in which writers promote their research articles in the highlights section of journals available online as a digital academic genre. A corpus of highlights from 300 research articles was randomly selected from journals in two major domains of knowledge, hard sciences and soft sciences. The corpus contained texts from the fields of (1) Chemistry and (2) Computer Science representing hard sciences and from (3) Linguistics and (4) Management representing soft sciences published in reputable journals in 2018 and 2019. The corpus was analysed in terms of the promotional and rhetorical moves based on a model developed by the researchers using the UAM Corpus Tool. The results show that despite similarities in the use of rhetorical moves, for example, Promoting the results (Move 4) as the most frequently used move in both corpora, there were disciplinary variations in the highlights section. Whereas hard science majors give secondary importance to promoting the value (Move 2) of their research, soft science majors promoted the scene of the study (Move 1) in the highlights. Analyses of the cyclical patterns of the highlights reveal that whereas hard sciences researchers combined promoting the results with promoting the methodological issues (Move 3), soft sciences writers showcased their results as well as promoting background information (Move 1) related to their actual research. https://revistaiberica.org/index.php/iberica/article/view/600move analysisdigital academic genresoft and hard scienceshighlights sectionresearch articles
spellingShingle Erdem Akbaş
Maryam Farnia
Exploring rhetorical moves in a digital academic genre: A cross-disciplinary study of the highlights section
Ibérica
move analysis
digital academic genre
soft and hard sciences
highlights section
research articles
title Exploring rhetorical moves in a digital academic genre: A cross-disciplinary study of the highlights section
title_full Exploring rhetorical moves in a digital academic genre: A cross-disciplinary study of the highlights section
title_fullStr Exploring rhetorical moves in a digital academic genre: A cross-disciplinary study of the highlights section
title_full_unstemmed Exploring rhetorical moves in a digital academic genre: A cross-disciplinary study of the highlights section
title_short Exploring rhetorical moves in a digital academic genre: A cross-disciplinary study of the highlights section
title_sort exploring rhetorical moves in a digital academic genre a cross disciplinary study of the highlights section
topic move analysis
digital academic genre
soft and hard sciences
highlights section
research articles
url https://revistaiberica.org/index.php/iberica/article/view/600
work_keys_str_mv AT erdemakbas exploringrhetoricalmovesinadigitalacademicgenreacrossdisciplinarystudyofthehighlightssection
AT maryamfarnia exploringrhetoricalmovesinadigitalacademicgenreacrossdisciplinarystudyofthehighlightssection