Evaluation Of The Stability Of Activator+High-Pull Headgear Therapy
Numerous views exist on the timing for functional therapy in Class II malocclusions. Different results concerning the dentofacial changes obtained with functional therapies during the pre-peak and peak periods have been may be reached. Regarding the stability of treatment, therapy carried out during...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Galenos Yayinevi
1999-08-01
|
Series: | Turkish Journal of Orthodontics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: |
http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/evaluation-of-the-stability-of-activatorhigh-pull-/54043
|
_version_ | 1797767236726816768 |
---|---|
author | Tamer Türk Müfide Dinçer |
author_facet | Tamer Türk Müfide Dinçer |
author_sort | Tamer Türk |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Numerous views exist on the timing for functional therapy in Class II malocclusions. Different results concerning the dentofacial changes obtained with functional therapies during the pre-peak and peak periods have been may be reached. Regarding the stability of treatment, therapy carried out during the peak period is mentioned to be more advantageous. In this study, retention and post-retention results of activator+high-pull headgear therapy were evaluated. Thirty-one parameters were evaluated from the materials of 17 patients obtained at the beginning of treatment and at the end of the following periods, i.e. active treatment, retention and post-retention. According to their hand-wrist radiographs the subjects were divided into to groups, Pre-peak and Peak groups. The changes occurring during active treatment did not demonstrate any differences between the groups and these changes remained stable during the retention and post-retention periods. Although, the increases of vertical facial heights and mandibular dimensions were more pronounced in the Pre-peak group during all periods, the parameters Go-Gn, N-ANS, N-Gn of the retention period (p<0.05) and the parameters Ar-Go, N-ANS of the post-retention period (p<0.05) demonstrated significant differences between the groups. Activator+high-pull headgear therapy carried out during Pre-peak and Peak periods did not bring forth any different results concerning the therapeutic outcomes and stability. However, the continuation of retention following early treatment would be useful, especially for the control of vertical facial growth. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T20:35:52Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-1a57146b628a42559f5ea4dbb834d83c |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2528-9659 2148-9505 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T20:35:52Z |
publishDate | 1999-08-01 |
publisher | Galenos Yayinevi |
record_format | Article |
series | Turkish Journal of Orthodontics |
spelling | doaj.art-1a57146b628a42559f5ea4dbb834d83c2023-08-01T12:58:43ZengGalenos YayineviTurkish Journal of Orthodontics2528-96592148-95051999-08-01122798810.13076/1300-3550-12-2-7913049054Evaluation Of The Stability Of Activator+High-Pull Headgear TherapyTamer Türk0Müfide Dinçer1 Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Ortodonti Anabilim Dalı Gazi Üniversitesi Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Ortodonti Anabilim Dalı Numerous views exist on the timing for functional therapy in Class II malocclusions. Different results concerning the dentofacial changes obtained with functional therapies during the pre-peak and peak periods have been may be reached. Regarding the stability of treatment, therapy carried out during the peak period is mentioned to be more advantageous. In this study, retention and post-retention results of activator+high-pull headgear therapy were evaluated. Thirty-one parameters were evaluated from the materials of 17 patients obtained at the beginning of treatment and at the end of the following periods, i.e. active treatment, retention and post-retention. According to their hand-wrist radiographs the subjects were divided into to groups, Pre-peak and Peak groups. The changes occurring during active treatment did not demonstrate any differences between the groups and these changes remained stable during the retention and post-retention periods. Although, the increases of vertical facial heights and mandibular dimensions were more pronounced in the Pre-peak group during all periods, the parameters Go-Gn, N-ANS, N-Gn of the retention period (p<0.05) and the parameters Ar-Go, N-ANS of the post-retention period (p<0.05) demonstrated significant differences between the groups. Activator+high-pull headgear therapy carried out during Pre-peak and Peak periods did not bring forth any different results concerning the therapeutic outcomes and stability. However, the continuation of retention following early treatment would be useful, especially for the control of vertical facial growth. http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/evaluation-of-the-stability-of-activatorhigh-pull-/54043 functional treatmentgrowth potentialstability |
spellingShingle | Tamer Türk Müfide Dinçer Evaluation Of The Stability Of Activator+High-Pull Headgear Therapy Turkish Journal of Orthodontics functional treatment growth potential stability |
title | Evaluation Of The Stability Of Activator+High-Pull Headgear Therapy |
title_full | Evaluation Of The Stability Of Activator+High-Pull Headgear Therapy |
title_fullStr | Evaluation Of The Stability Of Activator+High-Pull Headgear Therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation Of The Stability Of Activator+High-Pull Headgear Therapy |
title_short | Evaluation Of The Stability Of Activator+High-Pull Headgear Therapy |
title_sort | evaluation of the stability of activator high pull headgear therapy |
topic | functional treatment growth potential stability |
url |
http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/evaluation-of-the-stability-of-activatorhigh-pull-/54043
|
work_keys_str_mv | AT tamerturk evaluationofthestabilityofactivatorhighpullheadgeartherapy AT mufidedincer evaluationofthestabilityofactivatorhighpullheadgeartherapy |