Evaluation Of The Stability Of Activator+High-Pull Headgear Therapy

Numerous views exist on the timing for functional therapy in Class II malocclusions. Different results concerning the dentofacial changes obtained with functional therapies during the pre-peak and peak periods have been may be reached. Regarding the stability of treatment, therapy carried out during...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tamer Türk, Müfide Dinçer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Yayinevi 1999-08-01
Series:Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
Subjects:
Online Access: http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/evaluation-of-the-stability-of-activatorhigh-pull-/54043
_version_ 1797767236726816768
author Tamer Türk
Müfide Dinçer
author_facet Tamer Türk
Müfide Dinçer
author_sort Tamer Türk
collection DOAJ
description Numerous views exist on the timing for functional therapy in Class II malocclusions. Different results concerning the dentofacial changes obtained with functional therapies during the pre-peak and peak periods have been may be reached. Regarding the stability of treatment, therapy carried out during the peak period is mentioned to be more advantageous. In this study, retention and post-retention results of activator+high-pull headgear therapy were evaluated. Thirty-one parameters were evaluated from the materials of 17 patients obtained at the beginning of treatment and at the end of the following periods, i.e. active treatment, retention and post-retention. According to their hand-wrist radiographs the subjects were divided into to groups, Pre-peak and Peak groups. The changes occurring during active treatment did not demonstrate any differences between the groups and these changes remained stable during the retention and post-retention periods. Although, the increases of vertical facial heights and mandibular dimensions were more pronounced in the Pre-peak group during all periods, the parameters Go-Gn, N-ANS, N-Gn of the retention period (p<0.05) and the parameters Ar-Go, N-ANS of the post-retention period (p<0.05) demonstrated significant differences between the groups. Activator+high-pull headgear therapy carried out during Pre-peak and Peak periods did not bring forth any different results concerning the therapeutic outcomes and stability. However, the continuation of retention following early treatment would be useful, especially for the control of vertical facial growth.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T20:35:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1a57146b628a42559f5ea4dbb834d83c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2528-9659
2148-9505
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T20:35:52Z
publishDate 1999-08-01
publisher Galenos Yayinevi
record_format Article
series Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
spelling doaj.art-1a57146b628a42559f5ea4dbb834d83c2023-08-01T12:58:43ZengGalenos YayineviTurkish Journal of Orthodontics2528-96592148-95051999-08-01122798810.13076/1300-3550-12-2-7913049054Evaluation Of The Stability Of Activator+High-Pull Headgear TherapyTamer Türk0Müfide Dinçer1 Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Ortodonti Anabilim Dalı Gazi Üniversitesi Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Ortodonti Anabilim Dalı Numerous views exist on the timing for functional therapy in Class II malocclusions. Different results concerning the dentofacial changes obtained with functional therapies during the pre-peak and peak periods have been may be reached. Regarding the stability of treatment, therapy carried out during the peak period is mentioned to be more advantageous. In this study, retention and post-retention results of activator+high-pull headgear therapy were evaluated. Thirty-one parameters were evaluated from the materials of 17 patients obtained at the beginning of treatment and at the end of the following periods, i.e. active treatment, retention and post-retention. According to their hand-wrist radiographs the subjects were divided into to groups, Pre-peak and Peak groups. The changes occurring during active treatment did not demonstrate any differences between the groups and these changes remained stable during the retention and post-retention periods. Although, the increases of vertical facial heights and mandibular dimensions were more pronounced in the Pre-peak group during all periods, the parameters Go-Gn, N-ANS, N-Gn of the retention period (p<0.05) and the parameters Ar-Go, N-ANS of the post-retention period (p<0.05) demonstrated significant differences between the groups. Activator+high-pull headgear therapy carried out during Pre-peak and Peak periods did not bring forth any different results concerning the therapeutic outcomes and stability. However, the continuation of retention following early treatment would be useful, especially for the control of vertical facial growth. http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/evaluation-of-the-stability-of-activatorhigh-pull-/54043 functional treatmentgrowth potentialstability
spellingShingle Tamer Türk
Müfide Dinçer
Evaluation Of The Stability Of Activator+High-Pull Headgear Therapy
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
functional treatment
growth potential
stability
title Evaluation Of The Stability Of Activator+High-Pull Headgear Therapy
title_full Evaluation Of The Stability Of Activator+High-Pull Headgear Therapy
title_fullStr Evaluation Of The Stability Of Activator+High-Pull Headgear Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation Of The Stability Of Activator+High-Pull Headgear Therapy
title_short Evaluation Of The Stability Of Activator+High-Pull Headgear Therapy
title_sort evaluation of the stability of activator high pull headgear therapy
topic functional treatment
growth potential
stability
url http://www.turkjorthod.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/evaluation-of-the-stability-of-activatorhigh-pull-/54043
work_keys_str_mv AT tamerturk evaluationofthestabilityofactivatorhighpullheadgeartherapy
AT mufidedincer evaluationofthestabilityofactivatorhighpullheadgeartherapy