The impact of hypothetical PErsonalised Risk Information on informed choice and intention to undergo Colorectal Cancer screening colonoscopy in Scotland (PERICCS)—a randomised controlled trial
Abstract Background There is currently no existing evidence on the effects of personalised risk information on uptake of colonoscopy following first line screening for colorectal cancer. This study aimed to measure the impact of providing risk information based on faecal haemoglobin concentration to...
Main Authors: | Jayne Digby, Ronan E. O’Carroll, Julie A. Chambers, Robert J. C. Steele |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-10-01
|
Series: | BMC Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12916-020-01750-3 |
Similar Items
-
The impact of personalised risk information compared to a positive/negative result on informed choice and intention to undergo colonoscopy following colorectal Cancer screening in Scotland (PERICCS) - a randomised controlled trial: study protocol
by: Robert J. C. Steele, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01) -
Appraisal of the faecal haemoglobin, age and sex test (FAST) score in assessment of patients with lower bowel symptoms: an observational study
by: Jayne Digby, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01) -
Interval Cancer in Population-Based Colorectal Screening Programmes: Incidence and Characteristics of Tumours
by: Mercedes Vanaclocha-Espí, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01) -
Possible Value of Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) When Added in Symptomatic Patients Referred for Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review
by: Henrike Jacoba Brands, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01) -
Accuracy of a faecal immunochemical test in patients under colonoscopy surveillance of colorectal adenoma and cancer
by: Louise Olsson, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01)