Diagnostic laparoscopy or selective non-operative management for stable patients with penetrating abdominal trauma: What to choose?

Background: Selective non-operative management (NOM) and diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) are well-accepted approaches in the management of stable patients with penetrating abdominal trauma (PAT). The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of early DL in stable asympt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Oleh Yevhenovych Matsevych, Modise Zacharia Koto, Moses Balabyeki, Lehlogonolo David Mashego, Colleen Aldous
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2019;volume=15;issue=2;spage=130;epage=136;aulast=Matsevych
_version_ 1811227012560322560
author Oleh Yevhenovych Matsevych
Modise Zacharia Koto
Moses Balabyeki
Lehlogonolo David Mashego
Colleen Aldous
author_facet Oleh Yevhenovych Matsevych
Modise Zacharia Koto
Moses Balabyeki
Lehlogonolo David Mashego
Colleen Aldous
author_sort Oleh Yevhenovych Matsevych
collection DOAJ
description Background: Selective non-operative management (NOM) and diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) are well-accepted approaches in the management of stable patients with penetrating abdominal trauma (PAT). The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of early DL in stable asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients with PAT as opposed to NOM, a standard of care in this scenario. The secondary aim was to suggest possible indications for DL. Methods: Patients managed with DL or NOM over a 12-month period were included in this study. The age, gender, mechanism and location of injuries, trauma scores, haemodynamic and metabolic parameters, intraoperative findings and length of hospital stay (LOS) were recorded and correlated with outcomes. Results: Thirty-six patients were in the NOM group and 35 in the DL group. Stab wounds were more common. The most common location of injury was the anterior abdominal wall in the NOM group and the lower chest in the DL group. Computed tomography (CT) scan was performed more often in the NOM group (75% vs. 17.1%). The injury severity score (ISS), New ISS and PAT Index were higher in the DL group. Nearly 23 (66%) patients in the DL group had a penetration of the peritoneum, but no significant abdominal injuries. LOS in the NOM group was 2 days versus 3.1 days in the DL group. There were no missed injuries, complications or mortality. Conclusion: NOM is a preferred modality for minimally symptomatic stable patients. However, there is a risk of missed injuries and delayed treatment. DL accurately visualizes injuries, decreases unnecessary CT scans and avoids nontherapeutic laparotomies.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T09:35:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1a5ab512edad4e3699104198742c6b41
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0972-9941
1998-3921
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T09:35:18Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
spelling doaj.art-1a5ab512edad4e3699104198742c6b412022-12-22T03:38:15ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Minimal Access Surgery0972-99411998-39212019-01-0115213013610.4103/jmas.JMAS_72_18Diagnostic laparoscopy or selective non-operative management for stable patients with penetrating abdominal trauma: What to choose?Oleh Yevhenovych MatsevychModise Zacharia KotoMoses BalabyekiLehlogonolo David MashegoColleen AldousBackground: Selective non-operative management (NOM) and diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) are well-accepted approaches in the management of stable patients with penetrating abdominal trauma (PAT). The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of early DL in stable asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients with PAT as opposed to NOM, a standard of care in this scenario. The secondary aim was to suggest possible indications for DL. Methods: Patients managed with DL or NOM over a 12-month period were included in this study. The age, gender, mechanism and location of injuries, trauma scores, haemodynamic and metabolic parameters, intraoperative findings and length of hospital stay (LOS) were recorded and correlated with outcomes. Results: Thirty-six patients were in the NOM group and 35 in the DL group. Stab wounds were more common. The most common location of injury was the anterior abdominal wall in the NOM group and the lower chest in the DL group. Computed tomography (CT) scan was performed more often in the NOM group (75% vs. 17.1%). The injury severity score (ISS), New ISS and PAT Index were higher in the DL group. Nearly 23 (66%) patients in the DL group had a penetration of the peritoneum, but no significant abdominal injuries. LOS in the NOM group was 2 days versus 3.1 days in the DL group. There were no missed injuries, complications or mortality. Conclusion: NOM is a preferred modality for minimally symptomatic stable patients. However, there is a risk of missed injuries and delayed treatment. DL accurately visualizes injuries, decreases unnecessary CT scans and avoids nontherapeutic laparotomies.http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2019;volume=15;issue=2;spage=130;epage=136;aulast=MatsevychDiagnostic laparoscopylaparoscopynon-operative managementtrauma
spellingShingle Oleh Yevhenovych Matsevych
Modise Zacharia Koto
Moses Balabyeki
Lehlogonolo David Mashego
Colleen Aldous
Diagnostic laparoscopy or selective non-operative management for stable patients with penetrating abdominal trauma: What to choose?
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
Diagnostic laparoscopy
laparoscopy
non-operative management
trauma
title Diagnostic laparoscopy or selective non-operative management for stable patients with penetrating abdominal trauma: What to choose?
title_full Diagnostic laparoscopy or selective non-operative management for stable patients with penetrating abdominal trauma: What to choose?
title_fullStr Diagnostic laparoscopy or selective non-operative management for stable patients with penetrating abdominal trauma: What to choose?
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic laparoscopy or selective non-operative management for stable patients with penetrating abdominal trauma: What to choose?
title_short Diagnostic laparoscopy or selective non-operative management for stable patients with penetrating abdominal trauma: What to choose?
title_sort diagnostic laparoscopy or selective non operative management for stable patients with penetrating abdominal trauma what to choose
topic Diagnostic laparoscopy
laparoscopy
non-operative management
trauma
url http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2019;volume=15;issue=2;spage=130;epage=136;aulast=Matsevych
work_keys_str_mv AT olehyevhenovychmatsevych diagnosticlaparoscopyorselectivenonoperativemanagementforstablepatientswithpenetratingabdominaltraumawhattochoose
AT modisezachariakoto diagnosticlaparoscopyorselectivenonoperativemanagementforstablepatientswithpenetratingabdominaltraumawhattochoose
AT mosesbalabyeki diagnosticlaparoscopyorselectivenonoperativemanagementforstablepatientswithpenetratingabdominaltraumawhattochoose
AT lehlogonolodavidmashego diagnosticlaparoscopyorselectivenonoperativemanagementforstablepatientswithpenetratingabdominaltraumawhattochoose
AT colleenaldous diagnosticlaparoscopyorselectivenonoperativemanagementforstablepatientswithpenetratingabdominaltraumawhattochoose