Comparison of BISAP score with Ranson’s score in predicting severe acute pancreatitis

Objectives: To compare BISAP score with Ranson’s scoring in predicting severity of acute pancreatitis Methods: Extensive demographic, radiographic, and laboratory data from consecutive patients with AP admitted to our institution was collected between March 2014 to March 2015. Ranson’s and BISAP sc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D Karki, T Tamang, D Maharjan, P Thapa, S Shrestha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society of Surgeons of Nepal 2016-07-01
Series:Journal of Society of Surgeons of Nepal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/JSSN/article/view/15306
_version_ 1818894219849236480
author D Karki
T Tamang
D Maharjan
P Thapa
S Shrestha
author_facet D Karki
T Tamang
D Maharjan
P Thapa
S Shrestha
author_sort D Karki
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: To compare BISAP score with Ranson’s scoring in predicting severity of acute pancreatitis Methods: Extensive demographic, radiographic, and laboratory data from consecutive patients with AP admitted to our institution was collected between March 2014 to March 2015. Ranson’s and BISAP score was calculated. Severity of pancreatitis was defined according to Atlanta classification. Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV of both the scoring system was calculated and compared. Results: A total of 42 patients with diagnosis of acute pancreatitis were included during the study period. 21(50%) were male and 21(50%) were female. Mean age is 49.52 ± 17.37.Most common etiology was biliary (45%) followed by alcohol (31%). 20 (48%) patients were categorized as severe pancreatitis according to Atlanta classification. 21 (50%) patients had a Ranson’s score of ≥3 and 19 (45.24%) patients had a BISAP score of ≥3. Both Ranson’s and BISAP scoring system was statistically significant in determining SAP ( p-value = 0.002). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of Ranson’s and BISAP score was calculated to be 75%, 72.72%, 71.43%, 76.19% and 70%, 77.27%, 73.68%, 73.91%. respectively. The AUC for SAP by Ranson’s score is 0.7386 ; 95%CI (0.602 - 0.874) and BISAP score is 0.7364 ; 95% CI ( 0.599 - 0.872). Conclusions: Both Ranson’s and BISAP scoring system is similar in predicting SAP. However BISAP has the advantage due to its simplicity.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T18:25:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1a5ff3d5a7964025a00b3c73a443a09b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1815-3984
2392-4772
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T18:25:01Z
publishDate 2016-07-01
publisher Society of Surgeons of Nepal
record_format Article
series Journal of Society of Surgeons of Nepal
spelling doaj.art-1a5ff3d5a7964025a00b3c73a443a09b2022-12-21T20:10:52ZengSociety of Surgeons of NepalJournal of Society of Surgeons of Nepal1815-39842392-47722016-07-0118310.3126/jssn.v18i3.15306Comparison of BISAP score with Ranson’s score in predicting severe acute pancreatitisD KarkiT TamangD MaharjanP ThapaS ShresthaObjectives: To compare BISAP score with Ranson’s scoring in predicting severity of acute pancreatitis Methods: Extensive demographic, radiographic, and laboratory data from consecutive patients with AP admitted to our institution was collected between March 2014 to March 2015. Ranson’s and BISAP score was calculated. Severity of pancreatitis was defined according to Atlanta classification. Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, NPV of both the scoring system was calculated and compared. Results: A total of 42 patients with diagnosis of acute pancreatitis were included during the study period. 21(50%) were male and 21(50%) were female. Mean age is 49.52 ± 17.37.Most common etiology was biliary (45%) followed by alcohol (31%). 20 (48%) patients were categorized as severe pancreatitis according to Atlanta classification. 21 (50%) patients had a Ranson’s score of ≥3 and 19 (45.24%) patients had a BISAP score of ≥3. Both Ranson’s and BISAP scoring system was statistically significant in determining SAP ( p-value = 0.002). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of Ranson’s and BISAP score was calculated to be 75%, 72.72%, 71.43%, 76.19% and 70%, 77.27%, 73.68%, 73.91%. respectively. The AUC for SAP by Ranson’s score is 0.7386 ; 95%CI (0.602 - 0.874) and BISAP score is 0.7364 ; 95% CI ( 0.599 - 0.872). Conclusions: Both Ranson’s and BISAP scoring system is similar in predicting SAP. However BISAP has the advantage due to its simplicity.https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/JSSN/article/view/15306Acute PancreatitisSeverityBISAPRanson’s score
spellingShingle D Karki
T Tamang
D Maharjan
P Thapa
S Shrestha
Comparison of BISAP score with Ranson’s score in predicting severe acute pancreatitis
Journal of Society of Surgeons of Nepal
Acute Pancreatitis
Severity
BISAP
Ranson’s score
title Comparison of BISAP score with Ranson’s score in predicting severe acute pancreatitis
title_full Comparison of BISAP score with Ranson’s score in predicting severe acute pancreatitis
title_fullStr Comparison of BISAP score with Ranson’s score in predicting severe acute pancreatitis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of BISAP score with Ranson’s score in predicting severe acute pancreatitis
title_short Comparison of BISAP score with Ranson’s score in predicting severe acute pancreatitis
title_sort comparison of bisap score with ranson s score in predicting severe acute pancreatitis
topic Acute Pancreatitis
Severity
BISAP
Ranson’s score
url https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/JSSN/article/view/15306
work_keys_str_mv AT dkarki comparisonofbisapscorewithransonsscoreinpredictingsevereacutepancreatitis
AT ttamang comparisonofbisapscorewithransonsscoreinpredictingsevereacutepancreatitis
AT dmaharjan comparisonofbisapscorewithransonsscoreinpredictingsevereacutepancreatitis
AT pthapa comparisonofbisapscorewithransonsscoreinpredictingsevereacutepancreatitis
AT sshrestha comparisonofbisapscorewithransonsscoreinpredictingsevereacutepancreatitis