It is time for a new type of type to facilitate naming the microbial world
Since January 1, 2001, the only acceptable nomenclatural type for species under the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (ICNP) has been pure cultures. Here, we argue that this requirement is discordant with the more inclusive nature of nomenclatural types accepted under other codes of...
Main Authors: | M. Palmer, I. Sutcliffe, S.N. Venter, B.P. Hedlund |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2022-04-01
|
Series: | New Microbes and New Infections |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2052297522000439 |
Similar Items
-
Reply to Oren et al., “New Phylum Names Harmonize Prokaryotic Nomenclature”
by: Gaurav Sharma, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01) -
Editorial: Extremophiles: Microbial genomics and taxogenomics
by: Rafael R. de la Haba, et al.
Published: (2022-08-01) -
Editorial: Community series-extremophiles: microbial genomics and taxogenomics, volume II
by: André Antunes, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Challenging the anthropocentric emphasis on phenotypic testing in prokaryotic species descriptions: rip it up and start again
by: Iain C. Sutcliffe
Published: (2015-06-01) -
Genomes from uncultivated prokaryotes: a comparison of metagenome-assembled and single-amplified genomes
by: Johannes Alneberg, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01)