Adherence With Online Therapy vs Face-to-Face Therapy and With Online Therapy vs Care as Usual: Secondary Analysis of Two Randomized Controlled Trials
BackgroundAdherence to internet-delivered interventions targeting mental health such as online psychotherapeutic aftercare is important for the intervention’s impact. High dropout rates limit the impact and generalizability of findings. Baseline differences may be putting pat...
Main Authors: | Sonia Lippke, Lingling Gao, Franziska Maria Keller, Petra Becker, Alina Dahmen |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
JMIR Publications
2021-11-01
|
Series: | Journal of Medical Internet Research |
Online Access: | https://www.jmir.org/2021/11/e31274 |
Similar Items
-
Predictors of Dropout Among Psychosomatic Rehabilitation Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Secondary Analysis of a Longitudinal Study of Digital Training
by: Lingling Gao, et al.
Published: (2023-11-01) -
Descriptive analysis of adherence to mindfulness-based group therapies: online versus face-to-face interventions
by: G. Navarro Oliver, et al.
Published: (2022-06-01) -
Online vs. face-to-face experiments, a Matching to Sample procedure
by: Fátima Rojas-Iturria, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Face-to-face vs. Online Asynchronous Teaching in a Conservation Biology Course
by: Carrie Wells, et al.
Published: (2022-06-01) -
Examining the Role of Motivation and Learning Strategies in the Success of Online vs. Face-to-Face Students
by: Emily Stark
Published: (2019-09-01)