THE IMPACT OF TAXES ON INDIVIDUAL LONG-TERM SAVINGS DECISION
This paper uses experimental methods to analyze how different forms of taxation influence the decision between immediate consumption and saving. The parameters are chosen in such a way that the treatments No Tax, Immediate Taxation and Deferred Taxation have identical net payoffs, which should indu...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń
2022-02-01
|
Series: | Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://apcz.umk.pl/CJFA/article/view/37582 |
_version_ | 1797706565316247552 |
---|---|
author | Dominik Tschinkl Nathalie Weikert Dirk Kiesewetter |
author_facet | Dominik Tschinkl Nathalie Weikert Dirk Kiesewetter |
author_sort | Dominik Tschinkl |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
This paper uses experimental methods to analyze how different forms of taxation influence the decision between immediate consumption and saving. The parameters are chosen in such a way that the treatments No Tax, Immediate Taxation and Deferred Taxation have identical net payoffs, which should induce the same decisionmaking patterns. However, we find that these expectations only apply to the treatments No Tax and Immediate Taxation. The participants in the Deferred Taxation treatment show a significantly weaker preference for saving which hints at a misperception of this form of taxation. This result also has political implications as many OECD countries try to incentivize voluntary saving for retirement through deferred taxation. In the experiment, however, this type of taxation leads to less saving than an economically equivalent immediate taxation of savings. Furthermore, the paper shows that individuals only partially recognize the advantages of immediate or deferred taxation compared to a classic income tax. While the periodic yield is tax exempt in systems of immediate or deferred taxation, it is taxable under a classical income tax. The latter should have a negative effect on saving decisions. However, these theoretical predictions do not hold in our experiment.
|
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T05:53:11Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-1a81db9257564feead731f418445b73b |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2300-1240 2300-3065 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T05:53:11Z |
publishDate | 2022-02-01 |
publisher | Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń |
record_format | Article |
series | Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting |
spelling | doaj.art-1a81db9257564feead731f418445b73b2023-09-03T04:53:03ZengNicolaus Copernicus University in ToruńCopernican Journal of Finance & Accounting2300-12402300-30652022-02-0110410.12775/CJFA.2021.020THE IMPACT OF TAXES ON INDIVIDUAL LONG-TERM SAVINGS DECISIONDominik Tschinkl0Nathalie Weikert1Dirk Kiesewetter2Steuerbuero MenzelUniversity of WuerzburgUniversity of Wuerzburg This paper uses experimental methods to analyze how different forms of taxation influence the decision between immediate consumption and saving. The parameters are chosen in such a way that the treatments No Tax, Immediate Taxation and Deferred Taxation have identical net payoffs, which should induce the same decisionmaking patterns. However, we find that these expectations only apply to the treatments No Tax and Immediate Taxation. The participants in the Deferred Taxation treatment show a significantly weaker preference for saving which hints at a misperception of this form of taxation. This result also has political implications as many OECD countries try to incentivize voluntary saving for retirement through deferred taxation. In the experiment, however, this type of taxation leads to less saving than an economically equivalent immediate taxation of savings. Furthermore, the paper shows that individuals only partially recognize the advantages of immediate or deferred taxation compared to a classic income tax. While the periodic yield is tax exempt in systems of immediate or deferred taxation, it is taxable under a classical income tax. The latter should have a negative effect on saving decisions. However, these theoretical predictions do not hold in our experiment. https://apcz.umk.pl/CJFA/article/view/37582behavioral economicsexperimental economicstax misperceptionsavings decision |
spellingShingle | Dominik Tschinkl Nathalie Weikert Dirk Kiesewetter THE IMPACT OF TAXES ON INDIVIDUAL LONG-TERM SAVINGS DECISION Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting behavioral economics experimental economics tax misperception savings decision |
title | THE IMPACT OF TAXES ON INDIVIDUAL LONG-TERM SAVINGS DECISION |
title_full | THE IMPACT OF TAXES ON INDIVIDUAL LONG-TERM SAVINGS DECISION |
title_fullStr | THE IMPACT OF TAXES ON INDIVIDUAL LONG-TERM SAVINGS DECISION |
title_full_unstemmed | THE IMPACT OF TAXES ON INDIVIDUAL LONG-TERM SAVINGS DECISION |
title_short | THE IMPACT OF TAXES ON INDIVIDUAL LONG-TERM SAVINGS DECISION |
title_sort | impact of taxes on individual long term savings decision |
topic | behavioral economics experimental economics tax misperception savings decision |
url | https://apcz.umk.pl/CJFA/article/view/37582 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dominiktschinkl theimpactoftaxesonindividuallongtermsavingsdecision AT nathalieweikert theimpactoftaxesonindividuallongtermsavingsdecision AT dirkkiesewetter theimpactoftaxesonindividuallongtermsavingsdecision AT dominiktschinkl impactoftaxesonindividuallongtermsavingsdecision AT nathalieweikert impactoftaxesonindividuallongtermsavingsdecision AT dirkkiesewetter impactoftaxesonindividuallongtermsavingsdecision |