Improving Digital Patient Care: Lessons Learned from Patient-Reported and Expert-Reported Experience Measures for the Clinical Practice of Multidimensional Walking Assessment

Background: Walking assessment (WA) enables meaningful patient mobility assessment. In this context, patient satisfaction with WA can influence assessment compliance and indirectly affect outcomes. One opportunity to assess patient satisfaction is patient-reported and expert-reported experience meas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria Scholz, Rocco Haase, Katrin Trentzsch, Heidi Stölzer-Hutsch, Tjalf Ziemssen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Series:Brain Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/6/786
_version_ 1797530165688926208
author Maria Scholz
Rocco Haase
Katrin Trentzsch
Heidi Stölzer-Hutsch
Tjalf Ziemssen
author_facet Maria Scholz
Rocco Haase
Katrin Trentzsch
Heidi Stölzer-Hutsch
Tjalf Ziemssen
author_sort Maria Scholz
collection DOAJ
description Background: Walking assessment (WA) enables meaningful patient mobility assessment. In this context, patient satisfaction with WA can influence assessment compliance and indirectly affect outcomes. One opportunity to assess patient satisfaction is patient-reported and expert-reported experience measures (PREM). Research on PREMs and WA in daily clinical multiple sclerosis (MS) practice does not exist yet. Methods: We surveyed people with MS about their experience and assessed healthcare professionals’ experience via an interview after patients completed WA. Results: Gait parameters were related to perceived difficulty and strain during performance. Less impaired patients perceived the WA to be less difficult and exhausting but were less likely to use WA results for themselves. Men and patients with higher impairment would perform WA more frequently. A good workflow, a fully performed WA with standardized testing, fully functional measurement systems, support and safeguarding by staff in case of falls, direct feedback after the testing, and patients’ motivation are identified by the experts as necessary factors for a successful WA. Conclusions: As patients’ experience has an impact on patients’ outcomes, long-term monitoring of PREMs should become an integral part of the healthcare service to identify and avoid problems early.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T10:25:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1a8e6c358ad94b7c940860fb07e1c009
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3425
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T10:25:06Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Brain Sciences
spelling doaj.art-1a8e6c358ad94b7c940860fb07e1c0092023-11-22T00:05:29ZengMDPI AGBrain Sciences2076-34252021-06-0111678610.3390/brainsci11060786Improving Digital Patient Care: Lessons Learned from Patient-Reported and Expert-Reported Experience Measures for the Clinical Practice of Multidimensional Walking AssessmentMaria Scholz0Rocco Haase1Katrin Trentzsch2Heidi Stölzer-Hutsch3Tjalf Ziemssen4Center of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl-Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, 01307 Dresden, GermanyCenter of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl-Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, 01307 Dresden, GermanyCenter of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl-Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, 01307 Dresden, GermanyCenter of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl-Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, 01307 Dresden, GermanyCenter of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl-Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, 01307 Dresden, GermanyBackground: Walking assessment (WA) enables meaningful patient mobility assessment. In this context, patient satisfaction with WA can influence assessment compliance and indirectly affect outcomes. One opportunity to assess patient satisfaction is patient-reported and expert-reported experience measures (PREM). Research on PREMs and WA in daily clinical multiple sclerosis (MS) practice does not exist yet. Methods: We surveyed people with MS about their experience and assessed healthcare professionals’ experience via an interview after patients completed WA. Results: Gait parameters were related to perceived difficulty and strain during performance. Less impaired patients perceived the WA to be less difficult and exhausting but were less likely to use WA results for themselves. Men and patients with higher impairment would perform WA more frequently. A good workflow, a fully performed WA with standardized testing, fully functional measurement systems, support and safeguarding by staff in case of falls, direct feedback after the testing, and patients’ motivation are identified by the experts as necessary factors for a successful WA. Conclusions: As patients’ experience has an impact on patients’ outcomes, long-term monitoring of PREMs should become an integral part of the healthcare service to identify and avoid problems early.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/6/786patient-reported experience measuresexpert reported experience measureswalking assessmentmultiple sclerosis
spellingShingle Maria Scholz
Rocco Haase
Katrin Trentzsch
Heidi Stölzer-Hutsch
Tjalf Ziemssen
Improving Digital Patient Care: Lessons Learned from Patient-Reported and Expert-Reported Experience Measures for the Clinical Practice of Multidimensional Walking Assessment
Brain Sciences
patient-reported experience measures
expert reported experience measures
walking assessment
multiple sclerosis
title Improving Digital Patient Care: Lessons Learned from Patient-Reported and Expert-Reported Experience Measures for the Clinical Practice of Multidimensional Walking Assessment
title_full Improving Digital Patient Care: Lessons Learned from Patient-Reported and Expert-Reported Experience Measures for the Clinical Practice of Multidimensional Walking Assessment
title_fullStr Improving Digital Patient Care: Lessons Learned from Patient-Reported and Expert-Reported Experience Measures for the Clinical Practice of Multidimensional Walking Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Improving Digital Patient Care: Lessons Learned from Patient-Reported and Expert-Reported Experience Measures for the Clinical Practice of Multidimensional Walking Assessment
title_short Improving Digital Patient Care: Lessons Learned from Patient-Reported and Expert-Reported Experience Measures for the Clinical Practice of Multidimensional Walking Assessment
title_sort improving digital patient care lessons learned from patient reported and expert reported experience measures for the clinical practice of multidimensional walking assessment
topic patient-reported experience measures
expert reported experience measures
walking assessment
multiple sclerosis
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/6/786
work_keys_str_mv AT mariascholz improvingdigitalpatientcarelessonslearnedfrompatientreportedandexpertreportedexperiencemeasuresfortheclinicalpracticeofmultidimensionalwalkingassessment
AT roccohaase improvingdigitalpatientcarelessonslearnedfrompatientreportedandexpertreportedexperiencemeasuresfortheclinicalpracticeofmultidimensionalwalkingassessment
AT katrintrentzsch improvingdigitalpatientcarelessonslearnedfrompatientreportedandexpertreportedexperiencemeasuresfortheclinicalpracticeofmultidimensionalwalkingassessment
AT heidistolzerhutsch improvingdigitalpatientcarelessonslearnedfrompatientreportedandexpertreportedexperiencemeasuresfortheclinicalpracticeofmultidimensionalwalkingassessment
AT tjalfziemssen improvingdigitalpatientcarelessonslearnedfrompatientreportedandexpertreportedexperiencemeasuresfortheclinicalpracticeofmultidimensionalwalkingassessment