P6.7 DETERMINANTS FOR DIFFERENCES IN CENTRAL SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE CAUSED BY DIFFERENT CALIBRATION METHODS

Introduction: There are known issues and ongoing discussions regarding calibration methods using peripheral mean and diastolic or peripheral systolic and diastolic pressure for the determination of central systolic blood pressure. The aim of this cross-sectional study is an analysis of determinants...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher Mayer, Martin Bauhofer, Bernhard Hametner, Christoph Schmaderer, Uwe Heemann, Siegfried Wassertheurer*, Marcus Baumann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2015-11-01
Series:Artery Research
Online Access:https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125930654/view
_version_ 1828490295726047232
author Christopher Mayer
Martin Bauhofer
Bernhard Hametner
Christoph Schmaderer
Uwe Heemann
Siegfried Wassertheurer*
Marcus Baumann
author_facet Christopher Mayer
Martin Bauhofer
Bernhard Hametner
Christoph Schmaderer
Uwe Heemann
Siegfried Wassertheurer*
Marcus Baumann
author_sort Christopher Mayer
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: There are known issues and ongoing discussions regarding calibration methods using peripheral mean and diastolic or peripheral systolic and diastolic pressure for the determination of central systolic blood pressure. The aim of this cross-sectional study is an analysis of determinants for the differences in central systolic blood pressure between the two calibration methods. Methods: All measurements were obtained with the Mobil-O-Graph 24h PWA monitor calibrated with both calibration methods within the ISAR hemodialysis study. Measurement started after a short dialysis interval prior to dialysis and lasted for 24-hours. Peripheral and central systolic blood pressures were averaged. 345 patients (231 male / 114 female; 65 +− 15 years) were included and grouped according to peripheral systolic blood pressure and one of the following factors: age, sex, body-mass-index, diabetes mellitus, length of dialysis and coronary artery disease. Results: There is a significant influence of age, diabetes mellitus, and coronary artery disease, but not of sex, body-mass-index and length of dialysis. Exemplarily, significant differences in central systolic blood pressure were 12.5 +− 7.3 (pSBP <= 130 mmHg, no diabetes mellitus), 17.0 +− 9.9 mmHg (pSBP <= 130 mmHg, diabetes mellitus), 18.6 +− 11.3 mmHg (pSBP > 130 mmHg, no diabetes mellitus) and 26.1 +− 16.2 (pSBP > 130 mmHg, diabetes mellitus). Conclusions: These findings enhance our understanding of the differences in the two calibration methods. These results are generally assumed to play a role in future risk classification. It is suggested that the association of these factors is investigated in future studies.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T10:42:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1a92a00474cb40b2afa34c819161ffee
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1876-4401
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T10:42:10Z
publishDate 2015-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Artery Research
spelling doaj.art-1a92a00474cb40b2afa34c819161ffee2022-12-22T01:10:34ZengBMCArtery Research1876-44012015-11-011210.1016/j.artres.2015.10.291P6.7 DETERMINANTS FOR DIFFERENCES IN CENTRAL SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE CAUSED BY DIFFERENT CALIBRATION METHODSChristopher MayerMartin BauhoferBernhard HametnerChristoph SchmadererUwe HeemannSiegfried Wassertheurer*Marcus BaumannIntroduction: There are known issues and ongoing discussions regarding calibration methods using peripheral mean and diastolic or peripheral systolic and diastolic pressure for the determination of central systolic blood pressure. The aim of this cross-sectional study is an analysis of determinants for the differences in central systolic blood pressure between the two calibration methods. Methods: All measurements were obtained with the Mobil-O-Graph 24h PWA monitor calibrated with both calibration methods within the ISAR hemodialysis study. Measurement started after a short dialysis interval prior to dialysis and lasted for 24-hours. Peripheral and central systolic blood pressures were averaged. 345 patients (231 male / 114 female; 65 +− 15 years) were included and grouped according to peripheral systolic blood pressure and one of the following factors: age, sex, body-mass-index, diabetes mellitus, length of dialysis and coronary artery disease. Results: There is a significant influence of age, diabetes mellitus, and coronary artery disease, but not of sex, body-mass-index and length of dialysis. Exemplarily, significant differences in central systolic blood pressure were 12.5 +− 7.3 (pSBP <= 130 mmHg, no diabetes mellitus), 17.0 +− 9.9 mmHg (pSBP <= 130 mmHg, diabetes mellitus), 18.6 +− 11.3 mmHg (pSBP > 130 mmHg, no diabetes mellitus) and 26.1 +− 16.2 (pSBP > 130 mmHg, diabetes mellitus). Conclusions: These findings enhance our understanding of the differences in the two calibration methods. These results are generally assumed to play a role in future risk classification. It is suggested that the association of these factors is investigated in future studies.https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125930654/view
spellingShingle Christopher Mayer
Martin Bauhofer
Bernhard Hametner
Christoph Schmaderer
Uwe Heemann
Siegfried Wassertheurer*
Marcus Baumann
P6.7 DETERMINANTS FOR DIFFERENCES IN CENTRAL SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE CAUSED BY DIFFERENT CALIBRATION METHODS
Artery Research
title P6.7 DETERMINANTS FOR DIFFERENCES IN CENTRAL SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE CAUSED BY DIFFERENT CALIBRATION METHODS
title_full P6.7 DETERMINANTS FOR DIFFERENCES IN CENTRAL SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE CAUSED BY DIFFERENT CALIBRATION METHODS
title_fullStr P6.7 DETERMINANTS FOR DIFFERENCES IN CENTRAL SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE CAUSED BY DIFFERENT CALIBRATION METHODS
title_full_unstemmed P6.7 DETERMINANTS FOR DIFFERENCES IN CENTRAL SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE CAUSED BY DIFFERENT CALIBRATION METHODS
title_short P6.7 DETERMINANTS FOR DIFFERENCES IN CENTRAL SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE CAUSED BY DIFFERENT CALIBRATION METHODS
title_sort p6 7 determinants for differences in central systolic blood pressure caused by different calibration methods
url https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125930654/view
work_keys_str_mv AT christophermayer p67determinantsfordifferencesincentralsystolicbloodpressurecausedbydifferentcalibrationmethods
AT martinbauhofer p67determinantsfordifferencesincentralsystolicbloodpressurecausedbydifferentcalibrationmethods
AT bernhardhametner p67determinantsfordifferencesincentralsystolicbloodpressurecausedbydifferentcalibrationmethods
AT christophschmaderer p67determinantsfordifferencesincentralsystolicbloodpressurecausedbydifferentcalibrationmethods
AT uweheemann p67determinantsfordifferencesincentralsystolicbloodpressurecausedbydifferentcalibrationmethods
AT siegfriedwassertheurer p67determinantsfordifferencesincentralsystolicbloodpressurecausedbydifferentcalibrationmethods
AT marcusbaumann p67determinantsfordifferencesincentralsystolicbloodpressurecausedbydifferentcalibrationmethods