Adherence to the national guidance on foods and drinks to limit or avoid during pregnancy in England: the PEAR Study

Abstract Objective: The National Health Service (NHS) England website provides guidance on foods/drinks to avoid or limit during pregnancy because of microbiological, toxicological or teratogenic hazards. The aims were to determine adherence and whether demographic characteristics were associated...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lucy Beasant, Jenny Ingram, Pauline M Emmett, Janet E Cade, Caroline M Taylor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2024-01-01
Series:Public Health Nutrition
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1368980024000600/type/journal_article
_version_ 1797213098224910336
author Lucy Beasant
Jenny Ingram
Pauline M Emmett
Janet E Cade
Caroline M Taylor
author_facet Lucy Beasant
Jenny Ingram
Pauline M Emmett
Janet E Cade
Caroline M Taylor
author_sort Lucy Beasant
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective: The National Health Service (NHS) England website provides guidance on foods/drinks to avoid or limit during pregnancy because of microbiological, toxicological or teratogenic hazards. The aims were to determine adherence and whether demographic characteristics were associated with adherence. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Online survey of postpartum women resident in England during pregnancy. Participants: Recently, postpartum women resident in England during their pregnancy (n 598; median age 33 (IQR 30–36) years) completed an online questionnaire (April–November 2022). Questions included those on consumption of twenty-one food/drink items that the NHS advises pregnant women to avoid/limit. The study is part of the Pregnancy, the Environment And nutRition (PEAR) Study. Summary statistics were used to determine proportions adhering to the guidance. Adjusted logistic regression was used to model the associations of adherence with demographic characteristics. Results: Adherence was generally high (>90 % for eight of ten food/drink items to be avoided). However, among pre-pregnancy consumers, several items were not completely avoided, for example, 81 % (128/158) for game meat/gamebirds, 37 % (176/478) for cured meats and 17 % (81/467) for soft cheeses. Greater educational attainment (e.g. caffeinated soft drinks OR 2·25 (95 % CI 1·28, 3·94)), greater maternal age (e.g. oily fish 1·64 (1·05, 2·56)) and lower parity (e.g. caffeinated coffee 0.28 (0.11, 0.69)) were the most usual characteristics associated with adherence. Conclusion: Evidence of concerning levels of non-adherence for some food/drink items suggests a case for more education on some of the guidance, particularly for women with lower educational attainment, greater parity and greater maternal age. Further research on barriers to the implementation of the guidance is needed.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T16:17:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1a976cadd90a441abf0a8d0bf2fec7d0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1368-9800
1475-2727
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T10:52:52Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Public Health Nutrition
spelling doaj.art-1a976cadd90a441abf0a8d0bf2fec7d02024-04-12T07:44:09ZengCambridge University PressPublic Health Nutrition1368-98001475-27272024-01-012710.1017/S1368980024000600Adherence to the national guidance on foods and drinks to limit or avoid during pregnancy in England: the PEAR StudyLucy Beasant0Jenny Ingram1Pauline M Emmett2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1076-4779Janet E Cade3Caroline M Taylor4https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8347-5092Centre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UKCentre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UKCentre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UKNutritional Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, UKCentre for Academic Child Health, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK Abstract Objective: The National Health Service (NHS) England website provides guidance on foods/drinks to avoid or limit during pregnancy because of microbiological, toxicological or teratogenic hazards. The aims were to determine adherence and whether demographic characteristics were associated with adherence. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Online survey of postpartum women resident in England during pregnancy. Participants: Recently, postpartum women resident in England during their pregnancy (n 598; median age 33 (IQR 30–36) years) completed an online questionnaire (April–November 2022). Questions included those on consumption of twenty-one food/drink items that the NHS advises pregnant women to avoid/limit. The study is part of the Pregnancy, the Environment And nutRition (PEAR) Study. Summary statistics were used to determine proportions adhering to the guidance. Adjusted logistic regression was used to model the associations of adherence with demographic characteristics. Results: Adherence was generally high (>90 % for eight of ten food/drink items to be avoided). However, among pre-pregnancy consumers, several items were not completely avoided, for example, 81 % (128/158) for game meat/gamebirds, 37 % (176/478) for cured meats and 17 % (81/467) for soft cheeses. Greater educational attainment (e.g. caffeinated soft drinks OR 2·25 (95 % CI 1·28, 3·94)), greater maternal age (e.g. oily fish 1·64 (1·05, 2·56)) and lower parity (e.g. caffeinated coffee 0.28 (0.11, 0.69)) were the most usual characteristics associated with adherence. Conclusion: Evidence of concerning levels of non-adherence for some food/drink items suggests a case for more education on some of the guidance, particularly for women with lower educational attainment, greater parity and greater maternal age. Further research on barriers to the implementation of the guidance is needed. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1368980024000600/type/journal_articleDietPregnancyMidwifeNutrition guidancePublic healthPEAR Study
spellingShingle Lucy Beasant
Jenny Ingram
Pauline M Emmett
Janet E Cade
Caroline M Taylor
Adherence to the national guidance on foods and drinks to limit or avoid during pregnancy in England: the PEAR Study
Public Health Nutrition
Diet
Pregnancy
Midwife
Nutrition guidance
Public health
PEAR Study
title Adherence to the national guidance on foods and drinks to limit or avoid during pregnancy in England: the PEAR Study
title_full Adherence to the national guidance on foods and drinks to limit or avoid during pregnancy in England: the PEAR Study
title_fullStr Adherence to the national guidance on foods and drinks to limit or avoid during pregnancy in England: the PEAR Study
title_full_unstemmed Adherence to the national guidance on foods and drinks to limit or avoid during pregnancy in England: the PEAR Study
title_short Adherence to the national guidance on foods and drinks to limit or avoid during pregnancy in England: the PEAR Study
title_sort adherence to the national guidance on foods and drinks to limit or avoid during pregnancy in england the pear study
topic Diet
Pregnancy
Midwife
Nutrition guidance
Public health
PEAR Study
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1368980024000600/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT lucybeasant adherencetothenationalguidanceonfoodsanddrinkstolimitoravoidduringpregnancyinenglandthepearstudy
AT jennyingram adherencetothenationalguidanceonfoodsanddrinkstolimitoravoidduringpregnancyinenglandthepearstudy
AT paulinememmett adherencetothenationalguidanceonfoodsanddrinkstolimitoravoidduringpregnancyinenglandthepearstudy
AT janetecade adherencetothenationalguidanceonfoodsanddrinkstolimitoravoidduringpregnancyinenglandthepearstudy
AT carolinemtaylor adherencetothenationalguidanceonfoodsanddrinkstolimitoravoidduringpregnancyinenglandthepearstudy