Brussels I regulation: Recognition and enforcement of foreign court decisions in civil and commercial matters

The process of integration of European countries began with the formation of the Coal and Steel Community and as a historical category in a certain domain continues. This decades-long integration has been carried out in phases and in certain segments, and this very way of integration has resulted in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stanković Vladan, Opačić Ana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Business and Entrepreneurship, Belgrade 2022-01-01
Series:International Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/2217-9739/2022/2217-97392203168S.pdf
_version_ 1811158481558831104
author Stanković Vladan
Opačić Ana
author_facet Stanković Vladan
Opačić Ana
author_sort Stanković Vladan
collection DOAJ
description The process of integration of European countries began with the formation of the Coal and Steel Community and as a historical category in a certain domain continues. This decades-long integration has been carried out in phases and in certain segments, and this very way of integration has resulted in these areas not consistently following the basic principles on which the EU is based. The self-proclaimed goal of European integration, its maintenance and development as areas of freedom, security and justice, necessarily required, among other things, instruments and measures related to judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters, which would ensure the smooth functioning of the EU internal market. The rules of Brussels and regulations establish a single system of recognition and enforcement of foreign court decisions, overcoming the differences that exist in the national systems of member states, and unified rules on simplification of procedures for faster and simpler recognition and enforcement of such decisions. The authors below present the achieved level of unification of these rules from the aspect of functionality, primarily the time needed to execute a foreign decision, reduction of formalities, certainty of outcome and impossibility of conducting a parallel procedure, as the primary goal of Brussels I regulation.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T05:25:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1a9779d098384e278009565592864728
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2217-9739
2560-3353
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T05:25:26Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Faculty of Business and Entrepreneurship, Belgrade
record_format Article
series International Review
spelling doaj.art-1a9779d098384e2780095655928647282023-03-07T19:41:14ZengFaculty of Business and Entrepreneurship, BelgradeInternational Review2217-97392560-33532022-01-0120223-41681742217-97392203168SBrussels I regulation: Recognition and enforcement of foreign court decisions in civil and commercial mattersStanković Vladan0Opačić Ana1Union University "Nikola Tesla", Faculty of Business Studies and Law, Belgrade, SerbiaUnion University "Nikola Tesla", Faculty of Business Studies and Law, Belgrade, SerbiaThe process of integration of European countries began with the formation of the Coal and Steel Community and as a historical category in a certain domain continues. This decades-long integration has been carried out in phases and in certain segments, and this very way of integration has resulted in these areas not consistently following the basic principles on which the EU is based. The self-proclaimed goal of European integration, its maintenance and development as areas of freedom, security and justice, necessarily required, among other things, instruments and measures related to judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters, which would ensure the smooth functioning of the EU internal market. The rules of Brussels and regulations establish a single system of recognition and enforcement of foreign court decisions, overcoming the differences that exist in the national systems of member states, and unified rules on simplification of procedures for faster and simpler recognition and enforcement of such decisions. The authors below present the achieved level of unification of these rules from the aspect of functionality, primarily the time needed to execute a foreign decision, reduction of formalities, certainty of outcome and impossibility of conducting a parallel procedure, as the primary goal of Brussels I regulation.https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/2217-9739/2022/2217-97392203168S.pdfbrussels i regulationsrecognition and enforcement of foreign judgmentseuropean unioneu private lawcross-border trade
spellingShingle Stanković Vladan
Opačić Ana
Brussels I regulation: Recognition and enforcement of foreign court decisions in civil and commercial matters
International Review
brussels i regulations
recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments
european union
eu private law
cross-border trade
title Brussels I regulation: Recognition and enforcement of foreign court decisions in civil and commercial matters
title_full Brussels I regulation: Recognition and enforcement of foreign court decisions in civil and commercial matters
title_fullStr Brussels I regulation: Recognition and enforcement of foreign court decisions in civil and commercial matters
title_full_unstemmed Brussels I regulation: Recognition and enforcement of foreign court decisions in civil and commercial matters
title_short Brussels I regulation: Recognition and enforcement of foreign court decisions in civil and commercial matters
title_sort brussels i regulation recognition and enforcement of foreign court decisions in civil and commercial matters
topic brussels i regulations
recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments
european union
eu private law
cross-border trade
url https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/2217-9739/2022/2217-97392203168S.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT stankovicvladan brusselsiregulationrecognitionandenforcementofforeigncourtdecisionsincivilandcommercialmatters
AT opacicana brusselsiregulationrecognitionandenforcementofforeigncourtdecisionsincivilandcommercialmatters