Storia del pensiero statistico con alcune osservazioni sull'insegnamento della statistica

Statistical thinking changed in a striking way since its birth. From the descriptive statistics, linked up the research of statistical regularity, until the investigative statistics in the first part of XX century. Successively, the change was much quicker. First of all, statisticians put sampling a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rodolfo de Cristofaro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Bologna 2007-10-01
Series:Statistica
Online Access:http://rivista-statistica.unibo.it/article/view/403
_version_ 1811315020529664000
author Rodolfo de Cristofaro
author_facet Rodolfo de Cristofaro
author_sort Rodolfo de Cristofaro
collection DOAJ
description Statistical thinking changed in a striking way since its birth. From the descriptive statistics, linked up the research of statistical regularity, until the investigative statistics in the first part of XX century. Successively, the change was much quicker. First of all, statisticians put sampling and inference as the central core of the matter. Fisher came up with a revolutionary idea to solve the problem of inductive reasoning, by preliminarily designing the experiments in the process of data generation. However, Fisher's inference was no longer probabilistic, involving conclusions and choices which are outside the scope of probability theory. Then, Neyman substituted inductive behavior for Fisher's inductive reasoning, who he considered as a basic concept of philosophy of science. Later on, Neyman's ideas were further developed by Wald, who, in turn, transformed statistics in decision theory. Finally, Savage logically supported the Bayesian paradigm, prominent in all Statistics. Recently, statisticians promoted some pedagogical reasons to hesitate in introducing Bayesian paradigm to beginners. In particular, they placed variability (or "variation") as the essential mark in statistical teaching and in empirical enquiry, linked up a revaluation of the causal research and even of the old investigative statistics. The present paper compares the development of statistical thinking with respect to the similar change in philosophy of science from Galileo and Bacon until nowadays. Besides, it suggests coming back in placing phenomena considered from a non-deterministic viewpoint (collective phenomena) as the study subject of the matter, with a revaluation of all phases of statistical method, from the initial definition of a phenomenon until the final decision. Likewise, the essential mark in statistical teaching should be the method of scientific research rather than the pure and simple study of variation.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T11:22:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1aaa5d3eee1b4e919a7a4ae939e9a28a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0390-590X
1973-2201
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T11:22:45Z
publishDate 2007-10-01
publisher University of Bologna
record_format Article
series Statistica
spelling doaj.art-1aaa5d3eee1b4e919a7a4ae939e9a28a2022-12-22T02:48:46ZengUniversity of BolognaStatistica0390-590X1973-22012007-10-0162221522910.6092/issn.1973-2201/403394Storia del pensiero statistico con alcune osservazioni sull'insegnamento della statisticaRodolfo de CristofaroStatistical thinking changed in a striking way since its birth. From the descriptive statistics, linked up the research of statistical regularity, until the investigative statistics in the first part of XX century. Successively, the change was much quicker. First of all, statisticians put sampling and inference as the central core of the matter. Fisher came up with a revolutionary idea to solve the problem of inductive reasoning, by preliminarily designing the experiments in the process of data generation. However, Fisher's inference was no longer probabilistic, involving conclusions and choices which are outside the scope of probability theory. Then, Neyman substituted inductive behavior for Fisher's inductive reasoning, who he considered as a basic concept of philosophy of science. Later on, Neyman's ideas were further developed by Wald, who, in turn, transformed statistics in decision theory. Finally, Savage logically supported the Bayesian paradigm, prominent in all Statistics. Recently, statisticians promoted some pedagogical reasons to hesitate in introducing Bayesian paradigm to beginners. In particular, they placed variability (or "variation") as the essential mark in statistical teaching and in empirical enquiry, linked up a revaluation of the causal research and even of the old investigative statistics. The present paper compares the development of statistical thinking with respect to the similar change in philosophy of science from Galileo and Bacon until nowadays. Besides, it suggests coming back in placing phenomena considered from a non-deterministic viewpoint (collective phenomena) as the study subject of the matter, with a revaluation of all phases of statistical method, from the initial definition of a phenomenon until the final decision. Likewise, the essential mark in statistical teaching should be the method of scientific research rather than the pure and simple study of variation.http://rivista-statistica.unibo.it/article/view/403
spellingShingle Rodolfo de Cristofaro
Storia del pensiero statistico con alcune osservazioni sull'insegnamento della statistica
Statistica
title Storia del pensiero statistico con alcune osservazioni sull'insegnamento della statistica
title_full Storia del pensiero statistico con alcune osservazioni sull'insegnamento della statistica
title_fullStr Storia del pensiero statistico con alcune osservazioni sull'insegnamento della statistica
title_full_unstemmed Storia del pensiero statistico con alcune osservazioni sull'insegnamento della statistica
title_short Storia del pensiero statistico con alcune osservazioni sull'insegnamento della statistica
title_sort storia del pensiero statistico con alcune osservazioni sull insegnamento della statistica
url http://rivista-statistica.unibo.it/article/view/403
work_keys_str_mv AT rodolfodecristofaro storiadelpensierostatisticoconalcuneosservazionisullinsegnamentodellastatistica