Mapping the Groundwater Level and Soil Moisture of a Montane Peat Bog Using UAV Monitoring and Machine Learning

One of the best preconditions for the sufficient monitoring of peat bog ecosystems is the collection, processing, and analysis of unique spatial data to understand peat bog dynamics. Over two seasons, we sampled groundwater level (GWL) and soil moisture (SM) ground truth data at two diverse location...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Theodora Lendzioch, Jakub Langhammer, Lukáš Vlček, Robert Minařík
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-02-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/5/907
_version_ 1827605058907275264
author Theodora Lendzioch
Jakub Langhammer
Lukáš Vlček
Robert Minařík
author_facet Theodora Lendzioch
Jakub Langhammer
Lukáš Vlček
Robert Minařík
author_sort Theodora Lendzioch
collection DOAJ
description One of the best preconditions for the sufficient monitoring of peat bog ecosystems is the collection, processing, and analysis of unique spatial data to understand peat bog dynamics. Over two seasons, we sampled groundwater level (GWL) and soil moisture (SM) ground truth data at two diverse locations at the Rokytka Peat bog within the Sumava Mountains, Czechia. These data served as reference data and were modeled with a suite of potential variables derived from digital surface models (DSMs) and RGB, multispectral, and thermal orthoimages reflecting topomorphometry, vegetation, and surface temperature information generated from drone mapping. We used 34 predictors to feed the random forest (RF) algorithm. The predictor selection, hyperparameter tuning, and performance assessment were performed with the target-oriented leave-location-out (LLO) spatial cross-validation (CV) strategy combined with forward feature selection (FFS) to avoid overfitting and to predict on unknown locations. The spatial CV performance statistics showed low (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.12) to high (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.78) model predictions. The predictor importance was used for model interpretation, where temperature had strong impact on GWL and SM, and we found significant contributions of other predictors, such as Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Normalized Difference Index (NDI), Enhanced Red-Green-Blue Vegetation Index (ERGBVE), Shape Index (SHP), Green Leaf Index (GLI), Brightness Index (BI), Coloration Index (CI), Redness Index (RI), Primary Colours Hue Index (HI), Overall Hue Index (HUE), SAGA Wetness Index (TWI), Plan Curvature (PlnCurv), Topographic Position Index (TPI), and Vector Ruggedness Measure (VRM). Additionally, we estimated the area of applicability (AOA) by presenting maps where the prediction model yielded high-quality results and where predictions were highly uncertain because machine learning (ML) models make predictions far beyond sampling locations without sampling data with no knowledge about these environments. The AOA method is well suited and unique for planning and decision-making about the best sampling strategy, most notably with limited data.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T06:13:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1ab3a96d5ef7492493289ca641ee11b1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T06:13:24Z
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-1ab3a96d5ef7492493289ca641ee11b12023-12-03T11:55:57ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922021-02-0113590710.3390/rs13050907Mapping the Groundwater Level and Soil Moisture of a Montane Peat Bog Using UAV Monitoring and Machine LearningTheodora Lendzioch0Jakub Langhammer1Lukáš Vlček2Robert Minařík3Department of Physical geography and Geoecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Albertov 6, 128 43 Prague 2, Czech RepublicDepartment of Physical geography and Geoecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Albertov 6, 128 43 Prague 2, Czech RepublicDepartment of Water Resources, Institute of Hydrodynamics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Pod Pat’ankou 30, 166 12, Prague 6, Czech RepublicDepartment of Physical geography and Geoecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Albertov 6, 128 43 Prague 2, Czech RepublicOne of the best preconditions for the sufficient monitoring of peat bog ecosystems is the collection, processing, and analysis of unique spatial data to understand peat bog dynamics. Over two seasons, we sampled groundwater level (GWL) and soil moisture (SM) ground truth data at two diverse locations at the Rokytka Peat bog within the Sumava Mountains, Czechia. These data served as reference data and were modeled with a suite of potential variables derived from digital surface models (DSMs) and RGB, multispectral, and thermal orthoimages reflecting topomorphometry, vegetation, and surface temperature information generated from drone mapping. We used 34 predictors to feed the random forest (RF) algorithm. The predictor selection, hyperparameter tuning, and performance assessment were performed with the target-oriented leave-location-out (LLO) spatial cross-validation (CV) strategy combined with forward feature selection (FFS) to avoid overfitting and to predict on unknown locations. The spatial CV performance statistics showed low (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.12) to high (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.78) model predictions. The predictor importance was used for model interpretation, where temperature had strong impact on GWL and SM, and we found significant contributions of other predictors, such as Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Normalized Difference Index (NDI), Enhanced Red-Green-Blue Vegetation Index (ERGBVE), Shape Index (SHP), Green Leaf Index (GLI), Brightness Index (BI), Coloration Index (CI), Redness Index (RI), Primary Colours Hue Index (HI), Overall Hue Index (HUE), SAGA Wetness Index (TWI), Plan Curvature (PlnCurv), Topographic Position Index (TPI), and Vector Ruggedness Measure (VRM). Additionally, we estimated the area of applicability (AOA) by presenting maps where the prediction model yielded high-quality results and where predictions were highly uncertain because machine learning (ML) models make predictions far beyond sampling locations without sampling data with no knowledge about these environments. The AOA method is well suited and unique for planning and decision-making about the best sampling strategy, most notably with limited data.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/5/907peat bogsoil moistureUAVmachine learning (ML)random forest (RF)modelling
spellingShingle Theodora Lendzioch
Jakub Langhammer
Lukáš Vlček
Robert Minařík
Mapping the Groundwater Level and Soil Moisture of a Montane Peat Bog Using UAV Monitoring and Machine Learning
Remote Sensing
peat bog
soil moisture
UAV
machine learning (ML)
random forest (RF)
modelling
title Mapping the Groundwater Level and Soil Moisture of a Montane Peat Bog Using UAV Monitoring and Machine Learning
title_full Mapping the Groundwater Level and Soil Moisture of a Montane Peat Bog Using UAV Monitoring and Machine Learning
title_fullStr Mapping the Groundwater Level and Soil Moisture of a Montane Peat Bog Using UAV Monitoring and Machine Learning
title_full_unstemmed Mapping the Groundwater Level and Soil Moisture of a Montane Peat Bog Using UAV Monitoring and Machine Learning
title_short Mapping the Groundwater Level and Soil Moisture of a Montane Peat Bog Using UAV Monitoring and Machine Learning
title_sort mapping the groundwater level and soil moisture of a montane peat bog using uav monitoring and machine learning
topic peat bog
soil moisture
UAV
machine learning (ML)
random forest (RF)
modelling
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/5/907
work_keys_str_mv AT theodoralendzioch mappingthegroundwaterlevelandsoilmoistureofamontanepeatbogusinguavmonitoringandmachinelearning
AT jakublanghammer mappingthegroundwaterlevelandsoilmoistureofamontanepeatbogusinguavmonitoringandmachinelearning
AT lukasvlcek mappingthegroundwaterlevelandsoilmoistureofamontanepeatbogusinguavmonitoringandmachinelearning
AT robertminarik mappingthegroundwaterlevelandsoilmoistureofamontanepeatbogusinguavmonitoringandmachinelearning