From Complex Modulus E* to Creep Compliance D(t): Experimental and Modeling Study
Creep compliance (D(t)) is a very important input for the thermal cracking resistance in the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG). The aim of the work presented here is to predict the results of creep compliance D(t) from the result of complex modulus E*(ω). The work plan is divided i...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-04-01
|
| Series: | Materials |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/8/1945 |
| _version_ | 1797570086964297728 |
|---|---|
| author | Abdeldjalil Daoudi Daniel Perraton Anne Dony Alan Carter |
| author_facet | Abdeldjalil Daoudi Daniel Perraton Anne Dony Alan Carter |
| author_sort | Abdeldjalil Daoudi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Creep compliance (D(t)) is a very important input for the thermal cracking resistance in the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG). The aim of the work presented here is to predict the results of creep compliance D(t) from the result of complex modulus E*(ω). The work plan is divided in two main parts: an experimental part consisting of creep tests, and a modeling part. Three configurations were compared together, namely direct tensile, direct compression and indirect tensile tests. The modelling part consists of using a 2S2P1D model coupled to Kopelman approximation to switch from the frequency domain to the time domain. Additionally, 2S2P1D was used to calibrate the generalized Kelvin–Voigt model and get the creep compliance directly from E* results. The experimental results show that D(t) from direct tensile and direct compression are the same in the viscoelastic domain and are greater than D(t) from the indirect tensile test. The indirect tensile test (IDT) seems to be very difficult to achieve compared to the other two variants. The converted results using the 2S2P1D model coupled to Kopelman approximation and the results from the GKV model describe the experimental points very well. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T20:20:01Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-1acdf1d6e64440a5971d6f244e068f21 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1996-1944 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T20:20:01Z |
| publishDate | 2020-04-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Materials |
| spelling | doaj.art-1acdf1d6e64440a5971d6f244e068f212023-11-19T22:14:48ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442020-04-01138194510.3390/ma13081945From Complex Modulus E* to Creep Compliance D(t): Experimental and Modeling StudyAbdeldjalil Daoudi0Daniel Perraton1Anne Dony2Alan Carter3École de Technologie Supérieure (ÉTS), Construction Engineering, 1100 Notre-Dame Ouest, Montreal, QC H3C 1K3, CanadaÉcole de Technologie Supérieure (ÉTS), Construction Engineering, 1100 Notre-Dame Ouest, Montreal, QC H3C 1K3, CanadaInstitut de Recherche en Constructibilité, Université Paris-Est, 94234 École Spéciale des Travaux Publics, 28 avenue du Président Wilson, 94234 Cachan CEDEX, FranceÉcole de Technologie Supérieure (ÉTS), Construction Engineering, 1100 Notre-Dame Ouest, Montreal, QC H3C 1K3, CanadaCreep compliance (D(t)) is a very important input for the thermal cracking resistance in the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG). The aim of the work presented here is to predict the results of creep compliance D(t) from the result of complex modulus E*(ω). The work plan is divided in two main parts: an experimental part consisting of creep tests, and a modeling part. Three configurations were compared together, namely direct tensile, direct compression and indirect tensile tests. The modelling part consists of using a 2S2P1D model coupled to Kopelman approximation to switch from the frequency domain to the time domain. Additionally, 2S2P1D was used to calibrate the generalized Kelvin–Voigt model and get the creep compliance directly from E* results. The experimental results show that D(t) from direct tensile and direct compression are the same in the viscoelastic domain and are greater than D(t) from the indirect tensile test. The indirect tensile test (IDT) seems to be very difficult to achieve compared to the other two variants. The converted results using the 2S2P1D model coupled to Kopelman approximation and the results from the GKV model describe the experimental points very well.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/8/1945creep compliancecomplex modulus2S2P1D modeldirect tensile testdirect compression testindirect tensile test |
| spellingShingle | Abdeldjalil Daoudi Daniel Perraton Anne Dony Alan Carter From Complex Modulus E* to Creep Compliance D(t): Experimental and Modeling Study Materials creep compliance complex modulus 2S2P1D model direct tensile test direct compression test indirect tensile test |
| title | From Complex Modulus E* to Creep Compliance D(t): Experimental and Modeling Study |
| title_full | From Complex Modulus E* to Creep Compliance D(t): Experimental and Modeling Study |
| title_fullStr | From Complex Modulus E* to Creep Compliance D(t): Experimental and Modeling Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | From Complex Modulus E* to Creep Compliance D(t): Experimental and Modeling Study |
| title_short | From Complex Modulus E* to Creep Compliance D(t): Experimental and Modeling Study |
| title_sort | from complex modulus e to creep compliance d t experimental and modeling study |
| topic | creep compliance complex modulus 2S2P1D model direct tensile test direct compression test indirect tensile test |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/8/1945 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT abdeldjalildaoudi fromcomplexmodulusetocreepcompliancedtexperimentalandmodelingstudy AT danielperraton fromcomplexmodulusetocreepcompliancedtexperimentalandmodelingstudy AT annedony fromcomplexmodulusetocreepcompliancedtexperimentalandmodelingstudy AT alancarter fromcomplexmodulusetocreepcompliancedtexperimentalandmodelingstudy |