Robotic Assisted Radical Cystoprostatectomy and Intracorporeal Ileal Conduit Urinary Diversion for a Kidney Transplant Recipient

ABSTRACT Introduction and Objectives: Robotic assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) is an alternative to open radical cystectomy. As experience is gained with the RARC approach the technique is being applied to more complex surgical cases. We describe here our technique for RARC with intracorporeal il...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter A. Caputo, Daniel Ramirez, Matthew Maurice, Ryan Nelson, Onder Kara, Ercan Malkoc, David Goldfarb, Jihad Kaouk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
Series:International Brazilian Journal of Urology
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382017000601192&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1819206984947204096
author Peter A. Caputo
Daniel Ramirez
Matthew Maurice
Ryan Nelson
Onder Kara
Ercan Malkoc
David Goldfarb
Jihad Kaouk
author_facet Peter A. Caputo
Daniel Ramirez
Matthew Maurice
Ryan Nelson
Onder Kara
Ercan Malkoc
David Goldfarb
Jihad Kaouk
author_sort Peter A. Caputo
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Introduction and Objectives: Robotic assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) is an alternative to open radical cystectomy. As experience is gained with the RARC approach the technique is being applied to more complex surgical cases. We describe here our technique for RARC with intracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion for a renal transplant recipient. Materials and Methods: The patient is a 60-year old man with high-grade muscle invasive bladder cancer. He has a history of renal failure due to polycystic kidney disease and received a deceased donor renal transplant in 2008. His hospital course at time of transplant was complicated by low-level BK virus viremia. Interestingly his trans-urethral bladder tumor resection specimen at time of bladder cancer diagnosis stained positive for SV40. His native kidneys were anuric so bilateral laparoscopic nephrectomy was performed in a staged fashion 2 weeks prior to RARC. Our surgical technique utilizes 6 trocars, of note a 12-mm assistant trocar is placed 1 cm superior to the pubic symphysis, and this trocar is solely used to pass a laparoscopic stapler to facilitate the excision of the ileal segment and the stapled enteric anastomosis. Surgical steps include: identification of native ureters bilaterally (removed en bloc with the bladder specimen); identification of the transplanted ureter at the right bladder dome; posterior bladder and prostate dissection along Denonvilliers’ fascia; development of the space of Retzius; ligation and transection of the bladder and prostate vascular bundles; apical prostate dissection and transection of urethra; left pelvic lymphadenectomy; ilium resection for creation of the ileal conduit; stapled enteric anastomosis; ureteroileal anastomosis; maturation of the ileal conduit stoma. Results: The surgery had no intraoperative complications. Operative time was 443 minutes (7.4 hours). Estimated blood loss was 250 cc. Length of hospital stay was 5 days. The patient did not experience any postoperative complications. The patient maintained good renal graft function with no decline in eGFR to date. Conclusions: As surgeon comfort and experience with robotic assisted surgery grows, robotic surgery can successfully be applied to less frequently performed procedures. Here we successfully performed a robotic assisted radical cystoprostatectomy with intracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion for a renal transplant recipient.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T05:16:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1ae9ca1b6f05495a9f40b1720ae9c520
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1677-6119
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T05:16:17Z
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format Article
series International Brazilian Journal of Urology
spelling doaj.art-1ae9ca1b6f05495a9f40b1720ae9c5202022-12-21T17:58:48ZengSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational Brazilian Journal of Urology1677-61194361192119210.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2016.0227S1677-55382017000601192Robotic Assisted Radical Cystoprostatectomy and Intracorporeal Ileal Conduit Urinary Diversion for a Kidney Transplant RecipientPeter A. CaputoDaniel RamirezMatthew MauriceRyan NelsonOnder KaraErcan MalkocDavid GoldfarbJihad KaoukABSTRACT Introduction and Objectives: Robotic assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) is an alternative to open radical cystectomy. As experience is gained with the RARC approach the technique is being applied to more complex surgical cases. We describe here our technique for RARC with intracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion for a renal transplant recipient. Materials and Methods: The patient is a 60-year old man with high-grade muscle invasive bladder cancer. He has a history of renal failure due to polycystic kidney disease and received a deceased donor renal transplant in 2008. His hospital course at time of transplant was complicated by low-level BK virus viremia. Interestingly his trans-urethral bladder tumor resection specimen at time of bladder cancer diagnosis stained positive for SV40. His native kidneys were anuric so bilateral laparoscopic nephrectomy was performed in a staged fashion 2 weeks prior to RARC. Our surgical technique utilizes 6 trocars, of note a 12-mm assistant trocar is placed 1 cm superior to the pubic symphysis, and this trocar is solely used to pass a laparoscopic stapler to facilitate the excision of the ileal segment and the stapled enteric anastomosis. Surgical steps include: identification of native ureters bilaterally (removed en bloc with the bladder specimen); identification of the transplanted ureter at the right bladder dome; posterior bladder and prostate dissection along Denonvilliers’ fascia; development of the space of Retzius; ligation and transection of the bladder and prostate vascular bundles; apical prostate dissection and transection of urethra; left pelvic lymphadenectomy; ilium resection for creation of the ileal conduit; stapled enteric anastomosis; ureteroileal anastomosis; maturation of the ileal conduit stoma. Results: The surgery had no intraoperative complications. Operative time was 443 minutes (7.4 hours). Estimated blood loss was 250 cc. Length of hospital stay was 5 days. The patient did not experience any postoperative complications. The patient maintained good renal graft function with no decline in eGFR to date. Conclusions: As surgeon comfort and experience with robotic assisted surgery grows, robotic surgery can successfully be applied to less frequently performed procedures. Here we successfully performed a robotic assisted radical cystoprostatectomy with intracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion for a renal transplant recipient.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382017000601192&lng=en&tlng=en
spellingShingle Peter A. Caputo
Daniel Ramirez
Matthew Maurice
Ryan Nelson
Onder Kara
Ercan Malkoc
David Goldfarb
Jihad Kaouk
Robotic Assisted Radical Cystoprostatectomy and Intracorporeal Ileal Conduit Urinary Diversion for a Kidney Transplant Recipient
International Brazilian Journal of Urology
title Robotic Assisted Radical Cystoprostatectomy and Intracorporeal Ileal Conduit Urinary Diversion for a Kidney Transplant Recipient
title_full Robotic Assisted Radical Cystoprostatectomy and Intracorporeal Ileal Conduit Urinary Diversion for a Kidney Transplant Recipient
title_fullStr Robotic Assisted Radical Cystoprostatectomy and Intracorporeal Ileal Conduit Urinary Diversion for a Kidney Transplant Recipient
title_full_unstemmed Robotic Assisted Radical Cystoprostatectomy and Intracorporeal Ileal Conduit Urinary Diversion for a Kidney Transplant Recipient
title_short Robotic Assisted Radical Cystoprostatectomy and Intracorporeal Ileal Conduit Urinary Diversion for a Kidney Transplant Recipient
title_sort robotic assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and intracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion for a kidney transplant recipient
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382017000601192&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT peteracaputo roboticassistedradicalcystoprostatectomyandintracorporealilealconduiturinarydiversionforakidneytransplantrecipient
AT danielramirez roboticassistedradicalcystoprostatectomyandintracorporealilealconduiturinarydiversionforakidneytransplantrecipient
AT matthewmaurice roboticassistedradicalcystoprostatectomyandintracorporealilealconduiturinarydiversionforakidneytransplantrecipient
AT ryannelson roboticassistedradicalcystoprostatectomyandintracorporealilealconduiturinarydiversionforakidneytransplantrecipient
AT onderkara roboticassistedradicalcystoprostatectomyandintracorporealilealconduiturinarydiversionforakidneytransplantrecipient
AT ercanmalkoc roboticassistedradicalcystoprostatectomyandintracorporealilealconduiturinarydiversionforakidneytransplantrecipient
AT davidgoldfarb roboticassistedradicalcystoprostatectomyandintracorporealilealconduiturinarydiversionforakidneytransplantrecipient
AT jihadkaouk roboticassistedradicalcystoprostatectomyandintracorporealilealconduiturinarydiversionforakidneytransplantrecipient