Refractive error correction among urban and rural school children using two self-adjustable spectacles

Objective Self-refracting spectacles (SRSs) have different optical and mechanical designs, which may affect the refractive outcome, depending on the experience of the end user. This study compared the performance of two SRS among children in Ghana.Methods and analysis A cross-sectional study of two...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephen Ocansey, Rufaida Amuda, Carl Halladay Abraham, Emmanuel Kwasi Abu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2023-10-01
Series:BMJ Open Ophthalmology
Online Access:https://bmjophth.bmj.com/content/8/1/e001202.full
_version_ 1797370990668283904
author Stephen Ocansey
Rufaida Amuda
Carl Halladay Abraham
Emmanuel Kwasi Abu
author_facet Stephen Ocansey
Rufaida Amuda
Carl Halladay Abraham
Emmanuel Kwasi Abu
author_sort Stephen Ocansey
collection DOAJ
description Objective Self-refracting spectacles (SRSs) have different optical and mechanical designs, which may affect the refractive outcome, depending on the experience of the end user. This study compared the performance of two SRS among children in Ghana.Methods and analysis A cross-sectional study of two Alvarez variable-focus SRS designs was conducted. A total of 167 children (mean age 13.6±1.6 years) identified as having refractive error were recruited from 2465 students who underwent screening. Subjects completed self-refraction using FocusSpecs, and Adlens, autorefraction and cycloplegic subjective refraction (CSR) (gold standard). Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare visual outcomes and accuracy of refraction and graphically illustrated using Bland-Altman plots.Results Eighty (47.9%) urban and 87 (52.1%) rural children were analysed and only about one-quarter 40 (24.0%) wore spectacles. The proportion who achieved visual acuity of ≥6/7.5 with FocusSpec, Adlens, autorefraction and CSR among urban schools were 92.6%, 92.4%, 60% and 92.6%, while those in rural schools were 81.6%, 86.2%, 54.0% and 95.4%, respectively. The mean±SD spherical equivalent errors for urban and rural schools using FocusSpec, Adlens and CSR were −1.05±0.61 D, –0.97±0.58 D and −0.78±0.53 D; and −0.47±0.51 D, –0.55±0.43 D and −0.27±0.11 D, respectively. The mean differences between the two self-refraction spectacles for urban and rural schools were not statistically different (p>0.00) but differed significantly when both were compared with the gold standard (CSR) (p<0.05).Conclusion Background and refraction experience of school children did not significantly affect self-refraction.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T18:12:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1aeafae4977e401db06f6317ea55743f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2397-3269
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T18:12:21Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-1aeafae4977e401db06f6317ea55743f2023-12-31T22:10:08ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open Ophthalmology2397-32692023-10-018110.1136/bmjophth-2022-001202Refractive error correction among urban and rural school children using two self-adjustable spectaclesStephen Ocansey0Rufaida Amuda1Carl Halladay Abraham2Emmanuel Kwasi Abu3Department of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, GhanaAiren Eye Centre, Lagos, NigeriaDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, GhanaDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, GhanaObjective Self-refracting spectacles (SRSs) have different optical and mechanical designs, which may affect the refractive outcome, depending on the experience of the end user. This study compared the performance of two SRS among children in Ghana.Methods and analysis A cross-sectional study of two Alvarez variable-focus SRS designs was conducted. A total of 167 children (mean age 13.6±1.6 years) identified as having refractive error were recruited from 2465 students who underwent screening. Subjects completed self-refraction using FocusSpecs, and Adlens, autorefraction and cycloplegic subjective refraction (CSR) (gold standard). Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare visual outcomes and accuracy of refraction and graphically illustrated using Bland-Altman plots.Results Eighty (47.9%) urban and 87 (52.1%) rural children were analysed and only about one-quarter 40 (24.0%) wore spectacles. The proportion who achieved visual acuity of ≥6/7.5 with FocusSpec, Adlens, autorefraction and CSR among urban schools were 92.6%, 92.4%, 60% and 92.6%, while those in rural schools were 81.6%, 86.2%, 54.0% and 95.4%, respectively. The mean±SD spherical equivalent errors for urban and rural schools using FocusSpec, Adlens and CSR were −1.05±0.61 D, –0.97±0.58 D and −0.78±0.53 D; and −0.47±0.51 D, –0.55±0.43 D and −0.27±0.11 D, respectively. The mean differences between the two self-refraction spectacles for urban and rural schools were not statistically different (p>0.00) but differed significantly when both were compared with the gold standard (CSR) (p<0.05).Conclusion Background and refraction experience of school children did not significantly affect self-refraction.https://bmjophth.bmj.com/content/8/1/e001202.full
spellingShingle Stephen Ocansey
Rufaida Amuda
Carl Halladay Abraham
Emmanuel Kwasi Abu
Refractive error correction among urban and rural school children using two self-adjustable spectacles
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
title Refractive error correction among urban and rural school children using two self-adjustable spectacles
title_full Refractive error correction among urban and rural school children using two self-adjustable spectacles
title_fullStr Refractive error correction among urban and rural school children using two self-adjustable spectacles
title_full_unstemmed Refractive error correction among urban and rural school children using two self-adjustable spectacles
title_short Refractive error correction among urban and rural school children using two self-adjustable spectacles
title_sort refractive error correction among urban and rural school children using two self adjustable spectacles
url https://bmjophth.bmj.com/content/8/1/e001202.full
work_keys_str_mv AT stephenocansey refractiveerrorcorrectionamongurbanandruralschoolchildrenusingtwoselfadjustablespectacles
AT rufaidaamuda refractiveerrorcorrectionamongurbanandruralschoolchildrenusingtwoselfadjustablespectacles
AT carlhalladayabraham refractiveerrorcorrectionamongurbanandruralschoolchildrenusingtwoselfadjustablespectacles
AT emmanuelkwasiabu refractiveerrorcorrectionamongurbanandruralschoolchildrenusingtwoselfadjustablespectacles