Estimates of Aboveground Biomass from Texture Analysis of Landsat Imagery

Maps of forest biomass are important tools for managing natural resources and reporting terrestrial carbon stocks. Using the San Juan National Forest in Southwest Colorado as a case study, we evaluate regional biomass maps created using physical variables, spectral vegetation indices, and image text...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katharine C. Kelsey, Jason C. Neff
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2014-07-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/6/7/6407
_version_ 1818320605155426304
author Katharine C. Kelsey
Jason C. Neff
author_facet Katharine C. Kelsey
Jason C. Neff
author_sort Katharine C. Kelsey
collection DOAJ
description Maps of forest biomass are important tools for managing natural resources and reporting terrestrial carbon stocks. Using the San Juan National Forest in Southwest Colorado as a case study, we evaluate regional biomass maps created using physical variables, spectral vegetation indices, and image textural analysis on Landsat TM imagery. We investigate eight gray level co-occurrence matrix based texture measures (mean, variance, homogeneity, contrast, dissimilarity, entropy, second moment and correlation) on four window sizes (3 × 3, 5 × 5, 7 × 7, 9 × 9) at four offsets ([1,0], [1,1], [0,1], [1,−1]) on four Landsat TM bands (2, 3, 4, and 5). The map with the highest prediction quality was created using three texture metrics calculated from Landsat Band 2 on a 3 × 3 window and an offset of [0,1]: entropy, mean and correlation; and one physical variable: slope. The correlation of predicted versus observed biomass values for our texture-based biomass map is r = 0.86, the Root Mean Square Error is 45.6 Mg∙ha−1, and the Coefficient of Variation of the Root Mean Square Error is 0.31. We find that models including image texture variables are more strongly correlated with biomass than models using only physical and spectral variables. Additionally, we suggest that the use of texture appears to better capture the magnitude and direction of biomass change following disturbance compared to spectral approaches. The biomass mapping methods we present here are widely applicable throughout the US, as they are based on publically available datasets and utilize relatively simple analytical routines.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T10:27:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1afb826a7ede4113bee9fda4ffe400bc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T10:27:40Z
publishDate 2014-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-1afb826a7ede4113bee9fda4ffe400bc2022-12-21T23:50:57ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922014-07-01676407642210.3390/rs6076407rs6076407Estimates of Aboveground Biomass from Texture Analysis of Landsat ImageryKatharine C. Kelsey0Jason C. Neff1Environmental Studies Program, University of Colorado, 2200 Colorado Ave., Boulder, CO 80309, USAEnvironmental Studies Program, University of Colorado, 2200 Colorado Ave., Boulder, CO 80309, USAMaps of forest biomass are important tools for managing natural resources and reporting terrestrial carbon stocks. Using the San Juan National Forest in Southwest Colorado as a case study, we evaluate regional biomass maps created using physical variables, spectral vegetation indices, and image textural analysis on Landsat TM imagery. We investigate eight gray level co-occurrence matrix based texture measures (mean, variance, homogeneity, contrast, dissimilarity, entropy, second moment and correlation) on four window sizes (3 × 3, 5 × 5, 7 × 7, 9 × 9) at four offsets ([1,0], [1,1], [0,1], [1,−1]) on four Landsat TM bands (2, 3, 4, and 5). The map with the highest prediction quality was created using three texture metrics calculated from Landsat Band 2 on a 3 × 3 window and an offset of [0,1]: entropy, mean and correlation; and one physical variable: slope. The correlation of predicted versus observed biomass values for our texture-based biomass map is r = 0.86, the Root Mean Square Error is 45.6 Mg∙ha−1, and the Coefficient of Variation of the Root Mean Square Error is 0.31. We find that models including image texture variables are more strongly correlated with biomass than models using only physical and spectral variables. Additionally, we suggest that the use of texture appears to better capture the magnitude and direction of biomass change following disturbance compared to spectral approaches. The biomass mapping methods we present here are widely applicable throughout the US, as they are based on publically available datasets and utilize relatively simple analytical routines.http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/6/7/6407forestcarbonerrorregional biomass mapSan Juan National Forest
spellingShingle Katharine C. Kelsey
Jason C. Neff
Estimates of Aboveground Biomass from Texture Analysis of Landsat Imagery
Remote Sensing
forest
carbon
error
regional biomass map
San Juan National Forest
title Estimates of Aboveground Biomass from Texture Analysis of Landsat Imagery
title_full Estimates of Aboveground Biomass from Texture Analysis of Landsat Imagery
title_fullStr Estimates of Aboveground Biomass from Texture Analysis of Landsat Imagery
title_full_unstemmed Estimates of Aboveground Biomass from Texture Analysis of Landsat Imagery
title_short Estimates of Aboveground Biomass from Texture Analysis of Landsat Imagery
title_sort estimates of aboveground biomass from texture analysis of landsat imagery
topic forest
carbon
error
regional biomass map
San Juan National Forest
url http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/6/7/6407
work_keys_str_mv AT katharineckelsey estimatesofabovegroundbiomassfromtextureanalysisoflandsatimagery
AT jasoncneff estimatesofabovegroundbiomassfromtextureanalysisoflandsatimagery