Parasite detection and quantification in avian blood is dependent on storage medium and duration

Abstract Studies of parasites in wild animal populations often rely on molecular methods to both detect and quantify infections. However, method accuracy is likely to be influenced by the sampling approach taken prior to nucleic acid extraction. Avian Haemosporidia are studied primarily through the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joshua G. Lynton‐Jenkins, Alexis S. Chaine, Andrew F. Russell, Camille Bonneaud
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-02-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9819
_version_ 1797894173316087808
author Joshua G. Lynton‐Jenkins
Alexis S. Chaine
Andrew F. Russell
Camille Bonneaud
author_facet Joshua G. Lynton‐Jenkins
Alexis S. Chaine
Andrew F. Russell
Camille Bonneaud
author_sort Joshua G. Lynton‐Jenkins
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Studies of parasites in wild animal populations often rely on molecular methods to both detect and quantify infections. However, method accuracy is likely to be influenced by the sampling approach taken prior to nucleic acid extraction. Avian Haemosporidia are studied primarily through the screening of host blood, and a range of storage mediums are available for the short‐ to long‐term preservation of samples. Previous research has suggested that storage medium choice may impact the accuracy of PCR‐based parasite detection, however, this relationship has never been explicitly tested and may be exacerbated by the duration of sample storage. These considerations could also be especially critical for sensitive molecular methods used to quantify infection (qPCR). To test the effect of storage medium and duration on Plasmodium detection and quantification, we split blood samples collected from wild birds across three medium types (filter paper, Queen's lysis buffer, and 96% ethanol) and carried out DNA extractions at five time points (1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months post‐sampling). First, we found variation in DNA yield obtained from blood samples dependent on their storage medium which had subsequent negative impacts on both detection and estimates of Plasmodium copy number. Second, we found that detection accuracy (incidence of true positives) was highest for filter‐paper‐stored samples (97%), while accuracy for ethanol and Queen's lysis buffer‐stored samples was influenced by either storage duration or extraction yield, respectively. Lastly, longer storage durations were associated with decreased copy number estimates across all storage mediums; equating to a 58% reduction between the first‐ and third‐year post‐sampling for lysis‐stored samples. These results raise questions regarding the utility of standardizing samples by dilution, while also illustrating the critical importance of considering storage approaches in studies of Haemosporidia comparing samples subjected to different storage regimes and/or stored for varying lengths of time.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T07:04:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1b077d60ad4c4c52ac895422ab429ff8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7758
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T07:04:37Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj.art-1b077d60ad4c4c52ac895422ab429ff82023-02-27T08:56:39ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582023-02-01132n/an/a10.1002/ece3.9819Parasite detection and quantification in avian blood is dependent on storage medium and durationJoshua G. Lynton‐Jenkins0Alexis S. Chaine1Andrew F. Russell2Camille Bonneaud3Centre for Ecology and Conservation University of Exeter Penryn UKStation for Theoretical and Experimental Ecology CNRS Moulis FranceCentre for Ecology and Conservation University of Exeter Penryn UKCentre for Ecology and Conservation University of Exeter Penryn UKAbstract Studies of parasites in wild animal populations often rely on molecular methods to both detect and quantify infections. However, method accuracy is likely to be influenced by the sampling approach taken prior to nucleic acid extraction. Avian Haemosporidia are studied primarily through the screening of host blood, and a range of storage mediums are available for the short‐ to long‐term preservation of samples. Previous research has suggested that storage medium choice may impact the accuracy of PCR‐based parasite detection, however, this relationship has never been explicitly tested and may be exacerbated by the duration of sample storage. These considerations could also be especially critical for sensitive molecular methods used to quantify infection (qPCR). To test the effect of storage medium and duration on Plasmodium detection and quantification, we split blood samples collected from wild birds across three medium types (filter paper, Queen's lysis buffer, and 96% ethanol) and carried out DNA extractions at five time points (1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months post‐sampling). First, we found variation in DNA yield obtained from blood samples dependent on their storage medium which had subsequent negative impacts on both detection and estimates of Plasmodium copy number. Second, we found that detection accuracy (incidence of true positives) was highest for filter‐paper‐stored samples (97%), while accuracy for ethanol and Queen's lysis buffer‐stored samples was influenced by either storage duration or extraction yield, respectively. Lastly, longer storage durations were associated with decreased copy number estimates across all storage mediums; equating to a 58% reduction between the first‐ and third‐year post‐sampling for lysis‐stored samples. These results raise questions regarding the utility of standardizing samples by dilution, while also illustrating the critical importance of considering storage approaches in studies of Haemosporidia comparing samples subjected to different storage regimes and/or stored for varying lengths of time.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9819avian malariaDNA extractionPCRplasmodiumqPCRQueen's lysis buffer
spellingShingle Joshua G. Lynton‐Jenkins
Alexis S. Chaine
Andrew F. Russell
Camille Bonneaud
Parasite detection and quantification in avian blood is dependent on storage medium and duration
Ecology and Evolution
avian malaria
DNA extraction
PCR
plasmodium
qPCR
Queen's lysis buffer
title Parasite detection and quantification in avian blood is dependent on storage medium and duration
title_full Parasite detection and quantification in avian blood is dependent on storage medium and duration
title_fullStr Parasite detection and quantification in avian blood is dependent on storage medium and duration
title_full_unstemmed Parasite detection and quantification in avian blood is dependent on storage medium and duration
title_short Parasite detection and quantification in avian blood is dependent on storage medium and duration
title_sort parasite detection and quantification in avian blood is dependent on storage medium and duration
topic avian malaria
DNA extraction
PCR
plasmodium
qPCR
Queen's lysis buffer
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9819
work_keys_str_mv AT joshuaglyntonjenkins parasitedetectionandquantificationinavianbloodisdependentonstoragemediumandduration
AT alexisschaine parasitedetectionandquantificationinavianbloodisdependentonstoragemediumandduration
AT andrewfrussell parasitedetectionandquantificationinavianbloodisdependentonstoragemediumandduration
AT camillebonneaud parasitedetectionandquantificationinavianbloodisdependentonstoragemediumandduration