Concentrations versus amounts of biomarkers in urine: a comparison of approaches to assess pyrethroid exposure

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Assessment of human exposure to non-persistent pesticides such as pyrethroids is often based on urinary biomarker measurements. Urinary metabolite levels of these pesticides are usually reported in volume-weighted concentrations or c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bouchard Michèle, Carrier Gaétan, Fortin Marie-Chantale
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-11-01
Series:Environmental Health
Online Access:http://www.ehjournal.net/content/7/1/55
_version_ 1811259831180328960
author Bouchard Michèle
Carrier Gaétan
Fortin Marie-Chantale
author_facet Bouchard Michèle
Carrier Gaétan
Fortin Marie-Chantale
author_sort Bouchard Michèle
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Assessment of human exposure to non-persistent pesticides such as pyrethroids is often based on urinary biomarker measurements. Urinary metabolite levels of these pesticides are usually reported in volume-weighted concentrations or creatinine-adjusted concentrations measured in spot urine samples. It is known that these units are subject to intra- and inter-individual variations. This research aimed at studying the impact of these variations on the assessment of pyrethroid absorbed doses at individual and population levels.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Using data obtained from various adult and infantile populations, the intra and inter-individual variability in the urinary flow rate and creatinine excretion rate was first estimated. Individual absorbed doses were then calculated using volume-weighted or creatinine-adjusted concentrations according to published approaches and compared to those estimated from the amounts of biomarkers excreted in 15- or 24-h urine collections, the latter serving as a benchmark unit. The effect of the units of measurements (volume-weighted or creatinine adjusted concentrations or 24-h amounts) on results of the comparison of pyrethroid biomarker levels between two populations was also evaluated.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Estimation of daily absorbed doses of permethrin from volume-weighted or creatinine-adjusted concentrations of biomarkers was found to potentially lead to substantial under or overestimation when compared to doses reconstructed directly from amounts excreted in urine during a given period of time (-70 to +573% and -83 to +167%, respectively). It was also shown that the variability in creatinine excretion rate and urinary flow rate may introduce a bias in the case of between population comparisons.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The unit chosen to express biomonitoring data may influence the validity of estimated individual absorbed dose as well as the outcome of between population comparisons.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-12T18:38:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1b1280cdcc9c4139a992beaa50f4b597
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1476-069X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T18:38:28Z
publishDate 2008-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Environmental Health
spelling doaj.art-1b1280cdcc9c4139a992beaa50f4b5972022-12-22T03:20:52ZengBMCEnvironmental Health1476-069X2008-11-01715510.1186/1476-069X-7-55Concentrations versus amounts of biomarkers in urine: a comparison of approaches to assess pyrethroid exposureBouchard MichèleCarrier GaétanFortin Marie-Chantale<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Assessment of human exposure to non-persistent pesticides such as pyrethroids is often based on urinary biomarker measurements. Urinary metabolite levels of these pesticides are usually reported in volume-weighted concentrations or creatinine-adjusted concentrations measured in spot urine samples. It is known that these units are subject to intra- and inter-individual variations. This research aimed at studying the impact of these variations on the assessment of pyrethroid absorbed doses at individual and population levels.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Using data obtained from various adult and infantile populations, the intra and inter-individual variability in the urinary flow rate and creatinine excretion rate was first estimated. Individual absorbed doses were then calculated using volume-weighted or creatinine-adjusted concentrations according to published approaches and compared to those estimated from the amounts of biomarkers excreted in 15- or 24-h urine collections, the latter serving as a benchmark unit. The effect of the units of measurements (volume-weighted or creatinine adjusted concentrations or 24-h amounts) on results of the comparison of pyrethroid biomarker levels between two populations was also evaluated.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Estimation of daily absorbed doses of permethrin from volume-weighted or creatinine-adjusted concentrations of biomarkers was found to potentially lead to substantial under or overestimation when compared to doses reconstructed directly from amounts excreted in urine during a given period of time (-70 to +573% and -83 to +167%, respectively). It was also shown that the variability in creatinine excretion rate and urinary flow rate may introduce a bias in the case of between population comparisons.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The unit chosen to express biomonitoring data may influence the validity of estimated individual absorbed dose as well as the outcome of between population comparisons.</p>http://www.ehjournal.net/content/7/1/55
spellingShingle Bouchard Michèle
Carrier Gaétan
Fortin Marie-Chantale
Concentrations versus amounts of biomarkers in urine: a comparison of approaches to assess pyrethroid exposure
Environmental Health
title Concentrations versus amounts of biomarkers in urine: a comparison of approaches to assess pyrethroid exposure
title_full Concentrations versus amounts of biomarkers in urine: a comparison of approaches to assess pyrethroid exposure
title_fullStr Concentrations versus amounts of biomarkers in urine: a comparison of approaches to assess pyrethroid exposure
title_full_unstemmed Concentrations versus amounts of biomarkers in urine: a comparison of approaches to assess pyrethroid exposure
title_short Concentrations versus amounts of biomarkers in urine: a comparison of approaches to assess pyrethroid exposure
title_sort concentrations versus amounts of biomarkers in urine a comparison of approaches to assess pyrethroid exposure
url http://www.ehjournal.net/content/7/1/55
work_keys_str_mv AT bouchardmichele concentrationsversusamountsofbiomarkersinurineacomparisonofapproachestoassesspyrethroidexposure
AT carriergaetan concentrationsversusamountsofbiomarkersinurineacomparisonofapproachestoassesspyrethroidexposure
AT fortinmariechantale concentrationsversusamountsofbiomarkersinurineacomparisonofapproachestoassesspyrethroidexposure