Scientometrics, International Special Indexes, scientific productivity evaluation

This research aims at identifying and validating of indicators used to evaluate research productivity of Iranian researchers. In order to achieve this aim survey and documentary methods are used. Research society consists of a 80 person sample and members of this sample were selected among top resea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdolreza Noroozi Chakoli, mina rezaei
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Iranian Research Institute for Information and Technology 2014-12-01
Series:Iranian Journal of Information Processing & Management
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-76-8&slc_lang=en&sid=1
_version_ 1818247895735861248
author Abdolreza Noroozi Chakoli
mina rezaei
author_facet Abdolreza Noroozi Chakoli
mina rezaei
author_sort Abdolreza Noroozi Chakoli
collection DOAJ
description This research aims at identifying and validating of indicators used to evaluate research productivity of Iranian researchers. In order to achieve this aim survey and documentary methods are used. Research society consists of a 80 person sample and members of this sample were selected among top researchers of country during recent years (1389-1390) from 4 subject areas of humanities, medical sciences, technology and engineering and basic sciences. Instrument for collecting data is a questionnaire including 47 items focusing on indicators used to evaluate research productivity of researchers. The Cronbach’s coefficient alpha was applied to confirm it’s variability and coefficient equal to 96% was obtained. In order to confirm its validity, formal validity method was used. Responding to questions and testing research hypotheses was conducted at two levels of descriptive and inferential statistics. At the descriptive statistics level, standard deviation, average and frequency and at the inferential statistic’s level, variance analysis, least significant difference and Friedman tests were used. Results of research show that for researchers of humanities, the indicators related to book have high importance while for researchers of basic and medical sciences, indicators related to article have more importance and from point of view of technology and engineering researchers, indicators related to innovations and research plans in comparison to other indicators are more credit at evaluating research productivity of researchers.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T15:11:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1b157ec815084f69a1ada64cf0b1c6a5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2251-8223
2251-8231
language fas
last_indexed 2024-12-12T15:11:59Z
publishDate 2014-12-01
publisher Iranian Research Institute for Information and Technology
record_format Article
series Iranian Journal of Information Processing & Management
spelling doaj.art-1b157ec815084f69a1ada64cf0b1c6a52022-12-22T00:20:36ZfasIranian Research Institute for Information and TechnologyIranian Journal of Information Processing & Management2251-82232251-82312014-12-01301339Scientometrics, International Special Indexes, scientific productivity evaluationAbdolreza Noroozi Chakoli0mina rezaei12 Shahed University Shahed University This research aims at identifying and validating of indicators used to evaluate research productivity of Iranian researchers. In order to achieve this aim survey and documentary methods are used. Research society consists of a 80 person sample and members of this sample were selected among top researchers of country during recent years (1389-1390) from 4 subject areas of humanities, medical sciences, technology and engineering and basic sciences. Instrument for collecting data is a questionnaire including 47 items focusing on indicators used to evaluate research productivity of researchers. The Cronbach’s coefficient alpha was applied to confirm it’s variability and coefficient equal to 96% was obtained. In order to confirm its validity, formal validity method was used. Responding to questions and testing research hypotheses was conducted at two levels of descriptive and inferential statistics. At the descriptive statistics level, standard deviation, average and frequency and at the inferential statistic’s level, variance analysis, least significant difference and Friedman tests were used. Results of research show that for researchers of humanities, the indicators related to book have high importance while for researchers of basic and medical sciences, indicators related to article have more importance and from point of view of technology and engineering researchers, indicators related to innovations and research plans in comparison to other indicators are more credit at evaluating research productivity of researchers.http://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-76-8&slc_lang=en&sid=1Scientometric Accreditation Researchers Evaluation Indicators
spellingShingle Abdolreza Noroozi Chakoli
mina rezaei
Scientometrics, International Special Indexes, scientific productivity evaluation
Iranian Journal of Information Processing & Management
Scientometric
Accreditation
Researchers
Evaluation Indicators
title Scientometrics, International Special Indexes, scientific productivity evaluation
title_full Scientometrics, International Special Indexes, scientific productivity evaluation
title_fullStr Scientometrics, International Special Indexes, scientific productivity evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Scientometrics, International Special Indexes, scientific productivity evaluation
title_short Scientometrics, International Special Indexes, scientific productivity evaluation
title_sort scientometrics international special indexes scientific productivity evaluation
topic Scientometric
Accreditation
Researchers
Evaluation Indicators
url http://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-76-8&slc_lang=en&sid=1
work_keys_str_mv AT abdolrezanoroozichakoli scientometricsinternationalspecialindexesscientificproductivityevaluation
AT minarezaei scientometricsinternationalspecialindexesscientificproductivityevaluation