Does a fracture of the endocorrector rod affect the quality of life of a patient with spinal deformity?

Objective. To assess the effect of endocorrector rod fractures on the final result of treatment and the quality of life of patients operated on for spinal deformities of different etiology. Material and Methods. The study included 3833 patients older than 10 years who were operated on for spinal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mikhail V. Mikhaylovskiy, Elena V. Gubina, Alina A. Alshevskaya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Federal State Budgetary Institution "Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics n.a. Ya.L. Tsivyan" 2019-12-01
Series:Хирургия позвоночника
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.spinesurgery.ru/jour/article/view/1625/1626
_version_ 1827852712056717312
author Mikhail V. Mikhaylovskiy
Elena V. Gubina
Alina A. Alshevskaya
author_facet Mikhail V. Mikhaylovskiy
Elena V. Gubina
Alina A. Alshevskaya
author_sort Mikhail V. Mikhaylovskiy
collection DOAJ
description Objective. To assess the effect of endocorrector rod fractures on the final result of treatment and the quality of life of patients operated on for spinal deformities of different etiology. Material and Methods. The study included 3833 patients older than 10 years who were operated on for spinal deformities of various etiologies and had not been subjected to spinal surgery before admission to the clinic. In the pre- and postoperative periods, spondylograms in frontal and lateral projections in the standing position were studied using the Cobb method, the apical vertebra rotation was determined in accordance with the method of Sullivan et al. Patients answered questions of the SRS-24 questionnaire in the immediate and long-term follow-up periods. Results. In total, fractures of metal implant rods were detected in 85 (2.2 %) patients. The average scoliotic deformity in these patients was 84.5° before surgery, 49.9° after surgery, and 53.7° at the end of the follow-up period (postoperative progression was 3.8°). Thoracic kyphosis was 61.5° before surgery, 44.3° after surgery, and 48.7° at the end of the follow-up period; lumbar lordosis – 68.4°, 54.8°, and 56.5°; and apical vertebra rotation – 55.8°, 33.2° and 35.8°, respectively. According to the questionnaire data, patients estimated their appear- ance after surgery and general appearance somewhat lower and pain as less intense. Indicators of activity and function of the spine after the rod remounting were slightly lower than after the primary surgery. Remounting did not significantly affect the indicator of “consent to surgical treatment under the same conditions” – 80.6 and 80.0 %. Conclusion. Complications in the form of rod fracture do not have a significant negative effect on the treatment result from the standpoint of assessing the quality of life, provided that the corrective effect of the surgical intervention is maintained in the horizontal, frontal and sagittal planes.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T10:54:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1b1b7ce4eaeb4b3c8ef9a35b6929c8dd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1810-8997
2313-1497
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T10:54:11Z
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Federal State Budgetary Institution "Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics n.a. Ya.L. Tsivyan"
record_format Article
series Хирургия позвоночника
spelling doaj.art-1b1b7ce4eaeb4b3c8ef9a35b6929c8dd2023-09-02T06:33:47ZengMinistry of Health of Russian Federation, Federal State Budgetary Institution "Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics n.a. Ya.L. Tsivyan"Хирургия позвоночника1810-89972313-14972019-12-01164293510.14531/ss2019.4.29-35Does a fracture of the endocorrector rod affect the quality of life of a patient with spinal deformity?Mikhail V. Mikhaylovskiy0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4847-100XElena V. Gubina1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2278-1421Alina A. Alshevskaya2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7307-4524Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaeducs n.a. Ya.L. Tsivyan, Novosibirsk, RussiaNovosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaeducs n.a. Ya.L. Tsivyan, Novosibirsk, RussiaNovosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaeducs n.a. Ya.L. Tsivyan, Novosibirsk, RussiaObjective. To assess the effect of endocorrector rod fractures on the final result of treatment and the quality of life of patients operated on for spinal deformities of different etiology. Material and Methods. The study included 3833 patients older than 10 years who were operated on for spinal deformities of various etiologies and had not been subjected to spinal surgery before admission to the clinic. In the pre- and postoperative periods, spondylograms in frontal and lateral projections in the standing position were studied using the Cobb method, the apical vertebra rotation was determined in accordance with the method of Sullivan et al. Patients answered questions of the SRS-24 questionnaire in the immediate and long-term follow-up periods. Results. In total, fractures of metal implant rods were detected in 85 (2.2 %) patients. The average scoliotic deformity in these patients was 84.5° before surgery, 49.9° after surgery, and 53.7° at the end of the follow-up period (postoperative progression was 3.8°). Thoracic kyphosis was 61.5° before surgery, 44.3° after surgery, and 48.7° at the end of the follow-up period; lumbar lordosis – 68.4°, 54.8°, and 56.5°; and apical vertebra rotation – 55.8°, 33.2° and 35.8°, respectively. According to the questionnaire data, patients estimated their appear- ance after surgery and general appearance somewhat lower and pain as less intense. Indicators of activity and function of the spine after the rod remounting were slightly lower than after the primary surgery. Remounting did not significantly affect the indicator of “consent to surgical treatment under the same conditions” – 80.6 and 80.0 %. Conclusion. Complications in the form of rod fracture do not have a significant negative effect on the treatment result from the standpoint of assessing the quality of life, provided that the corrective effect of the surgical intervention is maintained in the horizontal, frontal and sagittal planes.https://www.spinesurgery.ru/jour/article/view/1625/1626spinal deformitiessurgical treatmentrod fractures
spellingShingle Mikhail V. Mikhaylovskiy
Elena V. Gubina
Alina A. Alshevskaya
Does a fracture of the endocorrector rod affect the quality of life of a patient with spinal deformity?
Хирургия позвоночника
spinal deformities
surgical treatment
rod fractures
title Does a fracture of the endocorrector rod affect the quality of life of a patient with spinal deformity?
title_full Does a fracture of the endocorrector rod affect the quality of life of a patient with spinal deformity?
title_fullStr Does a fracture of the endocorrector rod affect the quality of life of a patient with spinal deformity?
title_full_unstemmed Does a fracture of the endocorrector rod affect the quality of life of a patient with spinal deformity?
title_short Does a fracture of the endocorrector rod affect the quality of life of a patient with spinal deformity?
title_sort does a fracture of the endocorrector rod affect the quality of life of a patient with spinal deformity
topic spinal deformities
surgical treatment
rod fractures
url https://www.spinesurgery.ru/jour/article/view/1625/1626
work_keys_str_mv AT mikhailvmikhaylovskiy doesafractureoftheendocorrectorrodaffectthequalityoflifeofapatientwithspinaldeformity
AT elenavgubina doesafractureoftheendocorrectorrodaffectthequalityoflifeofapatientwithspinaldeformity
AT alinaaalshevskaya doesafractureoftheendocorrectorrodaffectthequalityoflifeofapatientwithspinaldeformity