THE COMPARATIVE COST-EFFICACY ANALYSIS OF VARIOUS ANTIHYPERTENSIVE THERAPIES
<p><strong>Aim.</strong> To perform the comparative cost-efficacy analysis of various antihypertensive therapies in hypertensives patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods.</strong> 140 hypertensive patients with history of ineffective antihypertensive th...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Столичная издательская компания
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.rpcardio.ru/jour/article/view/714 |
Summary: | <p><strong>Aim.</strong> To perform the comparative cost-efficacy analysis of various antihypertensive therapies in hypertensives patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods.</strong> 140 hypertensive patients with history of ineffective antihypertensive therapy were randomized in to 4 groups, 35 patients in each one. Patients of Group A received indapamide retard plus perindopril; group B - indapamide retard plus amlodipine; group C - amlodipine plus lisinopril; group D - amlodipine plus bisoprolol. The Russian version of general questionnaire MOS-SF-36 was applied for quality of a life estimated. Endothelium function was evaluated with B-mode ultrasonography (Acuson 128 ХР/10). Albuminuria level was detected by immunoturbometric method (Integra-700, Roche).</p><p><strong>Results.</strong> The drug combination B had the least cost. The drug combination C was the most effective. The drug combination C was the most economically rational. The drug combination A was the least economically rational for BP reduction. However the drug combination A was comparable with drug combination C in effects on quality of life and on endothelium function, and it was the most economically rational for albuminuria reduction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion.</strong> Indapamide retard plus perindopril combination is the most economically rational in patients with target-organ lesions (nephropathy). Lisinopril plus amlodipine combination is economically rational in patients without target-organ lesions. </p> |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1819-6446 2225-3653 |