CLASSICAL AND NON-CLASSICAL PHILOSOPHICAL ANTHROPOLOGY: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Introduction: The goals and values of human life, the search for the meaning of human existence contain the potential for a meaningful, progressive development of philosophical and anthropological ideas at any time in history. One of the tasks of philosophical anthropology is the formation of the im...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Minin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University
2018-04-01
|
| Series: | Вестник Мининского университета |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://vestnik.mininuniver.ru/jour/article/view/764 |
| _version_ | 1818118574461419520 |
|---|---|
| author | T. A. Kozlova |
| author_facet | T. A. Kozlova |
| author_sort | T. A. Kozlova |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Introduction: The goals and values of human life, the search for the meaning of human existence contain the potential for a meaningful, progressive development of philosophical and anthropological ideas at any time in history. One of the tasks of philosophical anthropology is the formation of the image of man, the choice of ways to achieve the ideal, the methods of comprehension and resolution of universal problems. The increasing processes of differentiation in science led to the formation of different views on the nature of man, to the distinction between classical and non-classical philosophical anthropology. А comparative analysis of these trends is given in this article.Materials and methods: The dialectical method is preferred in the question of research methodology, the hermeneutic and phenomenological approaches are used.Results: The development of philosophical anthropology correlates with the challenges of modernity. By tracking the trends of human change, philosophical anthropology changes the approach to the consideration of its main subject of research. The whole array of disciplines that study man comes to new discoveries, new theories, and philosophical anthropology changes its view of the vision, challenging the principles of classical philosophical anthropology.Classical philosophical anthropology elevates the biological nature of man to a pedestal, non-classical philosophical anthropology actualizes questions of language, culture, thinking, understanding, actualizes the hermeneutic and phenomenological approaches. The desire to understand a person in classical philosophical anthropology is based on the desire to fully reveal the biological mechanisms in a person. The perspective of treating a person in nonclassical philosophical anthropology is polyformen: man as a text, as a dreaming self, as an eternal transition. Non-classical philosophical anthropology, goes from the idea of identity to the idea of variability, from biological concepts to questions of culture, language, thinking.Discussion and Conclusions: The global society carries a whole spectrum of changes. The fragmentation and pluralism of the era of human deconstruction transforms the thinking, imagination and needs of man. The person himself is transformed, in connection with which the development of philosophical anthropology in the modern era is actualized. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T04:56:28Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-1b356ac35cde4d12ad479e518d82e605 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2307-1281 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T04:56:28Z |
| publishDate | 2018-04-01 |
| publisher | Minin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Вестник Мининского университета |
| spelling | doaj.art-1b356ac35cde4d12ad479e518d82e6052022-12-22T01:20:16ZengMinin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical UniversityВестник Мининского университета2307-12812018-04-016110.26795/2307-1281-2018-6-1-15612CLASSICAL AND NON-CLASSICAL PHILOSOPHICAL ANTHROPOLOGY: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIST. A. Kozlova0Minin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University (Minin University)Introduction: The goals and values of human life, the search for the meaning of human existence contain the potential for a meaningful, progressive development of philosophical and anthropological ideas at any time in history. One of the tasks of philosophical anthropology is the formation of the image of man, the choice of ways to achieve the ideal, the methods of comprehension and resolution of universal problems. The increasing processes of differentiation in science led to the formation of different views on the nature of man, to the distinction between classical and non-classical philosophical anthropology. А comparative analysis of these trends is given in this article.Materials and methods: The dialectical method is preferred in the question of research methodology, the hermeneutic and phenomenological approaches are used.Results: The development of philosophical anthropology correlates with the challenges of modernity. By tracking the trends of human change, philosophical anthropology changes the approach to the consideration of its main subject of research. The whole array of disciplines that study man comes to new discoveries, new theories, and philosophical anthropology changes its view of the vision, challenging the principles of classical philosophical anthropology.Classical philosophical anthropology elevates the biological nature of man to a pedestal, non-classical philosophical anthropology actualizes questions of language, culture, thinking, understanding, actualizes the hermeneutic and phenomenological approaches. The desire to understand a person in classical philosophical anthropology is based on the desire to fully reveal the biological mechanisms in a person. The perspective of treating a person in nonclassical philosophical anthropology is polyformen: man as a text, as a dreaming self, as an eternal transition. Non-classical philosophical anthropology, goes from the idea of identity to the idea of variability, from biological concepts to questions of culture, language, thinking.Discussion and Conclusions: The global society carries a whole spectrum of changes. The fragmentation and pluralism of the era of human deconstruction transforms the thinking, imagination and needs of man. The person himself is transformed, in connection with which the development of philosophical anthropology in the modern era is actualized.https://vestnik.mininuniver.ru/jour/article/view/764manlanguageculturenon-classical philosophical anthropologyhermeneutic approachphenomenological approach |
| spellingShingle | T. A. Kozlova CLASSICAL AND NON-CLASSICAL PHILOSOPHICAL ANTHROPOLOGY: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS Вестник Мининского университета man language culture non-classical philosophical anthropology hermeneutic approach phenomenological approach |
| title | CLASSICAL AND NON-CLASSICAL PHILOSOPHICAL ANTHROPOLOGY: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS |
| title_full | CLASSICAL AND NON-CLASSICAL PHILOSOPHICAL ANTHROPOLOGY: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS |
| title_fullStr | CLASSICAL AND NON-CLASSICAL PHILOSOPHICAL ANTHROPOLOGY: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS |
| title_full_unstemmed | CLASSICAL AND NON-CLASSICAL PHILOSOPHICAL ANTHROPOLOGY: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS |
| title_short | CLASSICAL AND NON-CLASSICAL PHILOSOPHICAL ANTHROPOLOGY: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS |
| title_sort | classical and non classical philosophical anthropology comparative analysis |
| topic | man language culture non-classical philosophical anthropology hermeneutic approach phenomenological approach |
| url | https://vestnik.mininuniver.ru/jour/article/view/764 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT takozlova classicalandnonclassicalphilosophicalanthropologycomparativeanalysis |