Can varying the number of teams in a shift schedule constitute a preventive strategy?

OBJECTIVE: The study examines the implications for shiftworkers of applying different numbers of teams in the organization of shiftwork. METHODS: The participating operators came from five different companies applying continuous shift rotation systems. The companies shared the same product organizat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hans Jeppe Jeppesen, Magnar Kleiven, Henrik Bøggild
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade de São Paulo 2004-12-01
Series:Revista de Saúde Pública
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102004000700008&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1818559708826435584
author Hans Jeppe Jeppesen
Magnar Kleiven
Henrik Bøggild
author_facet Hans Jeppe Jeppesen
Magnar Kleiven
Henrik Bøggild
author_sort Hans Jeppe Jeppesen
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVE: The study examines the implications for shiftworkers of applying different numbers of teams in the organization of shiftwork. METHODS: The participating operators came from five different companies applying continuous shift rotation systems. The companies shared the same product organization and a common corporate culture belonging to the same multinational company. Each company had a shift system consisting of four, five or six teams, with the proportion of shifts outside day work decreasing as the number of teams increased. Questionnaire and documentary data were used as data sources. RESULTS: Operators in systems with additional teams had more daywork but also more irregular working hours due to both overtime and schedule changes. Operators using six teams used fewer social compensation strategies. Operators in four teams were most satisfied with their work hours. Satisfaction with the time available for various social activities outside work varied inconsistently between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In rotating systems the application of more teams reduces the number of shifts outside day work. This apparent improvement for shiftworkers was counteracted by a concomitant irregularity produced by greater organizational requirements for flexibility. The balance of this interaction was found to have a critical impact on employees.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T00:29:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1b39db68e4ae48b6b0e9b8a4cb267bab
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1518-8787
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T00:29:04Z
publishDate 2004-12-01
publisher Universidade de São Paulo
record_format Article
series Revista de Saúde Pública
spelling doaj.art-1b39db68e4ae48b6b0e9b8a4cb267bab2022-12-21T23:24:55ZengUniversidade de São PauloRevista de Saúde Pública1518-87872004-12-0138suppl475510.1590/s0034-89102004000700008S0034-89102004000700008Can varying the number of teams in a shift schedule constitute a preventive strategy?Hans Jeppe Jeppesen0Magnar Kleiven1Henrik Bøggild2University of AarhusConfederation of Norwegian Business and IndustryUniversity Hospital of AarhusOBJECTIVE: The study examines the implications for shiftworkers of applying different numbers of teams in the organization of shiftwork. METHODS: The participating operators came from five different companies applying continuous shift rotation systems. The companies shared the same product organization and a common corporate culture belonging to the same multinational company. Each company had a shift system consisting of four, five or six teams, with the proportion of shifts outside day work decreasing as the number of teams increased. Questionnaire and documentary data were used as data sources. RESULTS: Operators in systems with additional teams had more daywork but also more irregular working hours due to both overtime and schedule changes. Operators using six teams used fewer social compensation strategies. Operators in four teams were most satisfied with their work hours. Satisfaction with the time available for various social activities outside work varied inconsistently between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In rotating systems the application of more teams reduces the number of shifts outside day work. This apparent improvement for shiftworkers was counteracted by a concomitant irregularity produced by greater organizational requirements for flexibility. The balance of this interaction was found to have a critical impact on employees.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102004000700008&lng=en&tlng=enTrabalho em turnosTrabalhadoresOrganização e administraçãoJornada de trabalhoSatisfação no trabalho
spellingShingle Hans Jeppe Jeppesen
Magnar Kleiven
Henrik Bøggild
Can varying the number of teams in a shift schedule constitute a preventive strategy?
Revista de Saúde Pública
Trabalho em turnos
Trabalhadores
Organização e administração
Jornada de trabalho
Satisfação no trabalho
title Can varying the number of teams in a shift schedule constitute a preventive strategy?
title_full Can varying the number of teams in a shift schedule constitute a preventive strategy?
title_fullStr Can varying the number of teams in a shift schedule constitute a preventive strategy?
title_full_unstemmed Can varying the number of teams in a shift schedule constitute a preventive strategy?
title_short Can varying the number of teams in a shift schedule constitute a preventive strategy?
title_sort can varying the number of teams in a shift schedule constitute a preventive strategy
topic Trabalho em turnos
Trabalhadores
Organização e administração
Jornada de trabalho
Satisfação no trabalho
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102004000700008&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT hansjeppejeppesen canvaryingthenumberofteamsinashiftscheduleconstituteapreventivestrategy
AT magnarkleiven canvaryingthenumberofteamsinashiftscheduleconstituteapreventivestrategy
AT henrikbøggild canvaryingthenumberofteamsinashiftscheduleconstituteapreventivestrategy