Marine diversity: the paradigms in patterns of species richness examined

The two central paradigms of marine diversity are that there is a latitudinal cline of increasing species richness from poles to tropics and that species richness increases with depth to a maximum around 2,000 m and thereafter decreases. However, these paradigms were based on data collected in the l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: John S. Gray
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas 2001-12-01
Series:Scientia Marina
Subjects:
Online Access:http://scientiamarina.revistas.csic.es/index.php/scientiamarina/article/view/681
_version_ 1819297585849958400
author John S. Gray
author_facet John S. Gray
author_sort John S. Gray
collection DOAJ
description The two central paradigms of marine diversity are that there is a latitudinal cline of increasing species richness from poles to tropics and that species richness increases with depth to a maximum around 2,000 m and thereafter decreases. However, these paradigms were based on data collected in the late 1950´s and early 1960´s. Here I show that the 1960´s data, are not representative and thus the paradigms need re-examination. New data from coastal areas in the northern hemisphere record species richness as high as the highest recorded in the deep-sea. Whilst this suggests that the cline of increasing diversity from shallow to deep-sea does not exist, however, the database for the deep sea is not sufficient to draw such a conclusion. The basic problem with the data from the 1960s is that samples were taken on ecological scales and yet they are used to answer evolutionary questions. The questions that such data were to answer were why do the tropics have higher species richness than polar regions or why do deep-sea sediments have more species than coastal sediments? Evolutionary questions need data from much larger spatial areas. Recently, data representative of large scales have been collected from coastal areas in the northern hemisphere and show that there is a cline of increasing species richness from the Arctic to the tropics, but there does not yet seem to be a similar cline in the southern hemisphere. A number of hypotheses have been proposed for the observed patterns in biodiversity. In terrestrial ecology the energy-productivity hypothesis has gained wide acceptance as an explanation for the latitudinal gradient. Here I examine this and other hypotheses critically. Finally an analysis of research priorities is made. Assessment is urgently needed of the spatial scales and dynamics of species richness from point samples to assemblages, habitats and landscapes, especially in coastal areas and in the tropics, where the threats to biodiversity are greatest. New technologies are available, such as side-scan sonar, acoustics, and under-water digital video cameras but as yet have been relatively little used. Conservation of marine biodiversity must be based on sound theory, yet marine diversity studies lag well behind those of terrestrial habitats.
first_indexed 2024-12-24T05:16:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1b49e830440f47dba4606a4d09ea682c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0214-8358
1886-8134
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-24T05:16:21Z
publishDate 2001-12-01
publisher Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
record_format Article
series Scientia Marina
spelling doaj.art-1b49e830440f47dba4606a4d09ea682c2022-12-21T17:13:33ZengConsejo Superior de Investigaciones CientíficasScientia Marina0214-83581886-81342001-12-0165S2415610.3989/scimar.2001.65s241675Marine diversity: the paradigms in patterns of species richness examinedJohn S. Gray0Biological Institute, University of OsloThe two central paradigms of marine diversity are that there is a latitudinal cline of increasing species richness from poles to tropics and that species richness increases with depth to a maximum around 2,000 m and thereafter decreases. However, these paradigms were based on data collected in the late 1950´s and early 1960´s. Here I show that the 1960´s data, are not representative and thus the paradigms need re-examination. New data from coastal areas in the northern hemisphere record species richness as high as the highest recorded in the deep-sea. Whilst this suggests that the cline of increasing diversity from shallow to deep-sea does not exist, however, the database for the deep sea is not sufficient to draw such a conclusion. The basic problem with the data from the 1960s is that samples were taken on ecological scales and yet they are used to answer evolutionary questions. The questions that such data were to answer were why do the tropics have higher species richness than polar regions or why do deep-sea sediments have more species than coastal sediments? Evolutionary questions need data from much larger spatial areas. Recently, data representative of large scales have been collected from coastal areas in the northern hemisphere and show that there is a cline of increasing species richness from the Arctic to the tropics, but there does not yet seem to be a similar cline in the southern hemisphere. A number of hypotheses have been proposed for the observed patterns in biodiversity. In terrestrial ecology the energy-productivity hypothesis has gained wide acceptance as an explanation for the latitudinal gradient. Here I examine this and other hypotheses critically. Finally an analysis of research priorities is made. Assessment is urgently needed of the spatial scales and dynamics of species richness from point samples to assemblages, habitats and landscapes, especially in coastal areas and in the tropics, where the threats to biodiversity are greatest. New technologies are available, such as side-scan sonar, acoustics, and under-water digital video cameras but as yet have been relatively little used. Conservation of marine biodiversity must be based on sound theory, yet marine diversity studies lag well behind those of terrestrial habitats.http://scientiamarina.revistas.csic.es/index.php/scientiamarina/article/view/681shallow-deeplatitudelongitudehypothesesconservation
spellingShingle John S. Gray
Marine diversity: the paradigms in patterns of species richness examined
Scientia Marina
shallow-deep
latitude
longitude
hypotheses
conservation
title Marine diversity: the paradigms in patterns of species richness examined
title_full Marine diversity: the paradigms in patterns of species richness examined
title_fullStr Marine diversity: the paradigms in patterns of species richness examined
title_full_unstemmed Marine diversity: the paradigms in patterns of species richness examined
title_short Marine diversity: the paradigms in patterns of species richness examined
title_sort marine diversity the paradigms in patterns of species richness examined
topic shallow-deep
latitude
longitude
hypotheses
conservation
url http://scientiamarina.revistas.csic.es/index.php/scientiamarina/article/view/681
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsgray marinediversitytheparadigmsinpatternsofspeciesrichnessexamined