A Reply to Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis—Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Trial”
We would like to thank Dr [...]
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-11-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5142/5/4/86 |
| _version_ | 1797546960399368192 |
|---|---|
| author | Bill I. Campbell |
| author_facet | Bill I. Campbell |
| author_sort | Bill I. Campbell |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | We would like to thank Dr [...] |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T14:37:35Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-1b4dd02037af45c89ba40ee2a2ebfdc7 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2411-5142 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T14:37:35Z |
| publishDate | 2020-11-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology |
| spelling | doaj.art-1b4dd02037af45c89ba40ee2a2ebfdc72023-11-20T22:03:32ZengMDPI AGJournal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology2411-51422020-11-015486010.3390/jfmk5040086A Reply to Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis—Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Trial”Bill I. Campbell0Exercise Science Program, Performance and Physique Enhancement Laboratory, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USAWe would like to thank Dr [...]https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5142/5/4/86n/a |
| spellingShingle | Bill I. Campbell A Reply to Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis—Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Trial” Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology n/a |
| title | A Reply to Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis—Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Trial” |
| title_full | A Reply to Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis—Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Trial” |
| title_fullStr | A Reply to Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis—Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Trial” |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Reply to Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis—Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Trial” |
| title_short | A Reply to Contrary to the Conclusions Stated in the Paper, Only Dry Fat-Free Mass Was Different between Groups upon Reanalysis—Comment on: “Intermittent Energy Restriction Attenuates the Loss of Fat-Free Mass in Resistance Trained Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Trial” |
| title_sort | reply to contrary to the conclusions stated in the paper only dry fat free mass was different between groups upon reanalysis comment on intermittent energy restriction attenuates the loss of fat free mass in resistance trained individuals a randomized controlled trial |
| topic | n/a |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2411-5142/5/4/86 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT billicampbell areplytocontrarytotheconclusionsstatedinthepaperonlydryfatfreemasswasdifferentbetweengroupsuponreanalysiscommentonintermittentenergyrestrictionattenuatesthelossoffatfreemassinresistancetrainedindividualsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT billicampbell replytocontrarytotheconclusionsstatedinthepaperonlydryfatfreemasswasdifferentbetweengroupsuponreanalysiscommentonintermittentenergyrestrictionattenuatesthelossoffatfreemassinresistancetrainedindividualsarandomizedcontrolledtrial |