Are different M = a + bI0 relationships due to a statistical bias?
Relationships between magnitude and macroseismic intensity are widely used, even though intensity is a non-metric observable. Several proposed relationships for the Italian and surrounding regions show a significant correlation of the parameters of the widely used functional form M = a + bI0 This co...
Main Author: | M. Mucciarelli |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV)
1998-06-01
|
Series: | Annals of Geophysics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.annalsofgeophysics.eu/index.php/annals/article/view/3789 |
Similar Items
-
Determination of parameters for historicaI British earthquakes
by: R. M. W. Musson
Published: (1996-06-01) -
The earthquake of 1 January 1837 in Southern Lebanon and N orthern Israel
by: N. N. Ambraseys
Published: (1997-06-01) -
Reassessing the Location, Magnitude, and Macroseismic Intensity Map of the 8 April 1893 Svilajnac (Serbia) Earthquake
by: Miodrag I. Manić, et al.
Published: (2024-05-01) -
INVBSTIGATION OF SINGLE FILLET WELD FOR BUILT-UPMEMBERS
by: Nabeel K. Al-sahib, et al.
Published: (2024-03-01) -
Statistical analysis of detected ionospheric anomalies with earthquake magnitudes: A case study of the New Zealand earthquakes of March 4, 2021
by: Jewel E. Thomas, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01)