Experimental Studies of a Pulse Pressurisation Technique for Measuring Building Airtightness

A pulse pressurisation technique is developed and utilised for determining building leakage at low pressure, based on a “quasi-steady pulse” concept. The underlying principle of the technique is to subject the building envelope to a known volume change in a short period of time (typically 1.5 s). Th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiaofeng Zheng, Edward Cooper, Yingqing Zu, Mark Gillott, David Tetlow, Saffa Riffat, Christopher Wood
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2019-06-01
Series:Future Cities and Environment
Subjects:
Online Access:https://futurecitiesandenvironment.com/articles/66
_version_ 1811334854247186432
author Xiaofeng Zheng
Edward Cooper
Yingqing Zu
Mark Gillott
David Tetlow
Saffa Riffat
Christopher Wood
author_facet Xiaofeng Zheng
Edward Cooper
Yingqing Zu
Mark Gillott
David Tetlow
Saffa Riffat
Christopher Wood
author_sort Xiaofeng Zheng
collection DOAJ
description A pulse pressurisation technique is developed and utilised for determining building leakage at low pressure, based on a “quasi-steady pulse” concept. The underlying principle of the technique is to subject the building envelope to a known volume change in a short period of time (typically 1.5 s). The resulting pressure pulse is recorded, from which the leakage characteristic at low pressure is determined. The technique minimizes the effects of wind and buoyancy forces and has proven to be repeatable. It can use a compact and portable test rig and does not need to penetrate the building envelope. Therefore, it can obtain the leakage of a building very quickly and efficiently. Throughout the various stages of research and development of the pulse technique, experimental investigations have been carried out under different configurations and scenarios in order to validate the changes that have been made for the purpose of system development and optimisation. This paper provides an overview of experimental investigations in the validation process by covering comparison between blower door and pulse unit, comparison between piston-based pulse unit and nozzle-based pulse unit, testing with multiple pulse units in a large building, testing with a known opening, and testing in different building types with a range of volumes and airtightness levels. It enables us to understand the strengths and the limits of the pulse technique, from the experimental and practical perspectives. A good repeatability level (within ±5%) has been maintained throughout the various developmental stages and the average value of Q50/Q4 reported herein was in close agreement (<1%) with that reported in a study based on a large database obtained across a number of countries. It was also proven feasible to measure the airtightness of large buildings using the pulse technique.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T17:15:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1b5caaef75624d00b642c833a5661ec5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2363-9075
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T17:15:30Z
publishDate 2019-06-01
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format Article
series Future Cities and Environment
spelling doaj.art-1b5caaef75624d00b642c833a5661ec52022-12-22T02:38:09ZengUbiquity PressFuture Cities and Environment2363-90752019-06-015110.5334/fce.6653Experimental Studies of a Pulse Pressurisation Technique for Measuring Building AirtightnessXiaofeng Zheng0Edward Cooper1Yingqing Zu2Mark Gillott3David Tetlow4Saffa Riffat5Christopher Wood6Architecture, Energy and Environment Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, NottinghamDepartment of Architecture and Built Environment, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nottingham, NingboDepartment of Architecture and Built Environment, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nottingham, NingboArchitecture, Energy and Environment Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, NottinghamArchitecture, Energy and Environment Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, NottinghamArchitecture, Energy and Environment Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, NottinghamArchitecture, Energy and Environment Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, NottinghamA pulse pressurisation technique is developed and utilised for determining building leakage at low pressure, based on a “quasi-steady pulse” concept. The underlying principle of the technique is to subject the building envelope to a known volume change in a short period of time (typically 1.5 s). The resulting pressure pulse is recorded, from which the leakage characteristic at low pressure is determined. The technique minimizes the effects of wind and buoyancy forces and has proven to be repeatable. It can use a compact and portable test rig and does not need to penetrate the building envelope. Therefore, it can obtain the leakage of a building very quickly and efficiently. Throughout the various stages of research and development of the pulse technique, experimental investigations have been carried out under different configurations and scenarios in order to validate the changes that have been made for the purpose of system development and optimisation. This paper provides an overview of experimental investigations in the validation process by covering comparison between blower door and pulse unit, comparison between piston-based pulse unit and nozzle-based pulse unit, testing with multiple pulse units in a large building, testing with a known opening, and testing in different building types with a range of volumes and airtightness levels. It enables us to understand the strengths and the limits of the pulse technique, from the experimental and practical perspectives. A good repeatability level (within ±5%) has been maintained throughout the various developmental stages and the average value of Q50/Q4 reported herein was in close agreement (<1%) with that reported in a study based on a large database obtained across a number of countries. It was also proven feasible to measure the airtightness of large buildings using the pulse technique.https://futurecitiesandenvironment.com/articles/66Building airtightnessBlower doorPulse techniqueExperimental validation
spellingShingle Xiaofeng Zheng
Edward Cooper
Yingqing Zu
Mark Gillott
David Tetlow
Saffa Riffat
Christopher Wood
Experimental Studies of a Pulse Pressurisation Technique for Measuring Building Airtightness
Future Cities and Environment
Building airtightness
Blower door
Pulse technique
Experimental validation
title Experimental Studies of a Pulse Pressurisation Technique for Measuring Building Airtightness
title_full Experimental Studies of a Pulse Pressurisation Technique for Measuring Building Airtightness
title_fullStr Experimental Studies of a Pulse Pressurisation Technique for Measuring Building Airtightness
title_full_unstemmed Experimental Studies of a Pulse Pressurisation Technique for Measuring Building Airtightness
title_short Experimental Studies of a Pulse Pressurisation Technique for Measuring Building Airtightness
title_sort experimental studies of a pulse pressurisation technique for measuring building airtightness
topic Building airtightness
Blower door
Pulse technique
Experimental validation
url https://futurecitiesandenvironment.com/articles/66
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaofengzheng experimentalstudiesofapulsepressurisationtechniqueformeasuringbuildingairtightness
AT edwardcooper experimentalstudiesofapulsepressurisationtechniqueformeasuringbuildingairtightness
AT yingqingzu experimentalstudiesofapulsepressurisationtechniqueformeasuringbuildingairtightness
AT markgillott experimentalstudiesofapulsepressurisationtechniqueformeasuringbuildingairtightness
AT davidtetlow experimentalstudiesofapulsepressurisationtechniqueformeasuringbuildingairtightness
AT saffariffat experimentalstudiesofapulsepressurisationtechniqueformeasuringbuildingairtightness
AT christopherwood experimentalstudiesofapulsepressurisationtechniqueformeasuringbuildingairtightness