Bradford’s law, the long tail principle, and transparency in Journal Impact Factor calculations

Beyond the commonly mentioned limitations of the Journal Impact Factor, we discuss the obsolete principle of selecting journals to create a fake-representative sample of ‘journals that matter’ and the opacity around the calculation and listing of Impact Factors. We use the example of Pharmacy Practi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fernandez-Llimos F
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2016-09-01
Series:Pharmacy Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.pharmacypractice.org/journal/index.php/pp/article/view/842/468
_version_ 1818528894449352704
author Fernandez-Llimos F
author_facet Fernandez-Llimos F
author_sort Fernandez-Llimos F
collection DOAJ
description Beyond the commonly mentioned limitations of the Journal Impact Factor, we discuss the obsolete principle of selecting journals to create a fake-representative sample of ‘journals that matter’ and the opacity around the calculation and listing of Impact Factors. We use the example of Pharmacy Practice in 2015 for illustration. We hypothesize that a business-oriented system of measuring the science and quality of scholarly journals may not be the best option to avoid biases and conflicts of interest.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T06:55:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1b607b6106bb41c0b07041d03440867a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1885-642X
1886-3655
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T06:55:59Z
publishDate 2016-09-01
publisher Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas
record_format Article
series Pharmacy Practice
spelling doaj.art-1b607b6106bb41c0b07041d03440867a2022-12-22T01:16:45ZengCentro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones FarmaceuticasPharmacy Practice1885-642X1886-36552016-09-0114384210.18549/PharmPract.2014.03.842Bradford’s law, the long tail principle, and transparency in Journal Impact Factor calculationsFernandez-Llimos FBeyond the commonly mentioned limitations of the Journal Impact Factor, we discuss the obsolete principle of selecting journals to create a fake-representative sample of ‘journals that matter’ and the opacity around the calculation and listing of Impact Factors. We use the example of Pharmacy Practice in 2015 for illustration. We hypothesize that a business-oriented system of measuring the science and quality of scholarly journals may not be the best option to avoid biases and conflicts of interest.http://www.pharmacypractice.org/journal/index.php/pp/article/view/842/468Journal Impact FactorReproducibility of ResultsSelection BiasConflict of InterestPeriodicals as TopicBibliometrics
spellingShingle Fernandez-Llimos F
Bradford’s law, the long tail principle, and transparency in Journal Impact Factor calculations
Pharmacy Practice
Journal Impact Factor
Reproducibility of Results
Selection Bias
Conflict of Interest
Periodicals as Topic
Bibliometrics
title Bradford’s law, the long tail principle, and transparency in Journal Impact Factor calculations
title_full Bradford’s law, the long tail principle, and transparency in Journal Impact Factor calculations
title_fullStr Bradford’s law, the long tail principle, and transparency in Journal Impact Factor calculations
title_full_unstemmed Bradford’s law, the long tail principle, and transparency in Journal Impact Factor calculations
title_short Bradford’s law, the long tail principle, and transparency in Journal Impact Factor calculations
title_sort bradford s law the long tail principle and transparency in journal impact factor calculations
topic Journal Impact Factor
Reproducibility of Results
Selection Bias
Conflict of Interest
Periodicals as Topic
Bibliometrics
url http://www.pharmacypractice.org/journal/index.php/pp/article/view/842/468
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandezllimosf bradfordslawthelongtailprincipleandtransparencyinjournalimpactfactorcalculations