Mapping mental barriers that prevent the use of neighborhood green spaces

In comparison to the study of green space use, the study of its non-use or rejection is greatly understudied. Neighborhood managers and members of local gardening initiatives of Halle-Newtown, Germany, state that residents ignore local green-blue infrastructure (GBI) for recreational use. Halle-Newt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dagmar Haase, Manuel Wolff, Nadja Schumacher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2021-12-01
Series:Ecology and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol26/iss4/art16/
_version_ 1811290316351733760
author Dagmar Haase
Manuel Wolff
Nadja Schumacher
author_facet Dagmar Haase
Manuel Wolff
Nadja Schumacher
author_sort Dagmar Haase
collection DOAJ
description In comparison to the study of green space use, the study of its non-use or rejection is greatly understudied. Neighborhood managers and members of local gardening initiatives of Halle-Newtown, Germany, state that residents ignore local green-blue infrastructure (GBI) for recreational use. Halle-Newtown is a former showcase, large prefabricated socialist housing estate that is now facing an increase of households deprived in multiple ways. We are interested in the question of why people of Halle-Newtown refuse to use local GBI. In order to uncover potential barriers to the enjoyment of the ecosystem service benefits of local GBI, we have chosen the method of mental mapping to explore place attachment in Halle-Newtown. In summer 2018, about 100 residents of Halle-Newtown described the places they prefer when relaxing from a stressful and hot summer day. The results were surprising. Local GBI, be it created in socialist times or recently, was completely absent from their mental maps. Instead, people would overcome longer distances and cover higher costs to reach central green spaces. Tacit knowledge, namely the untold general rejection of the entire neighborhood by the residents, was found to be the deeper reason behind non-use of GBI and missing place attachment. The results uncovered that both neighborhood neglect and the multi-scalar character of urban recreational ideas/behavior are factors that help us to understand non-use of urban GBI, two key insights for urban planning.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T04:10:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1b64fd40d83546ddbf97f8103468105a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1708-3087
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T04:10:42Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Resilience Alliance
record_format Article
series Ecology and Society
spelling doaj.art-1b64fd40d83546ddbf97f8103468105a2022-12-22T03:03:06ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872021-12-012641610.5751/ES-12675-26041612675Mapping mental barriers that prevent the use of neighborhood green spacesDagmar Haase0Manuel Wolff1Nadja Schumacher2Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Department of GeographyHumboldt Universität zu Berlin, Department of GeographyHumboldt Universität zu Berlin, Department of GeographyIn comparison to the study of green space use, the study of its non-use or rejection is greatly understudied. Neighborhood managers and members of local gardening initiatives of Halle-Newtown, Germany, state that residents ignore local green-blue infrastructure (GBI) for recreational use. Halle-Newtown is a former showcase, large prefabricated socialist housing estate that is now facing an increase of households deprived in multiple ways. We are interested in the question of why people of Halle-Newtown refuse to use local GBI. In order to uncover potential barriers to the enjoyment of the ecosystem service benefits of local GBI, we have chosen the method of mental mapping to explore place attachment in Halle-Newtown. In summer 2018, about 100 residents of Halle-Newtown described the places they prefer when relaxing from a stressful and hot summer day. The results were surprising. Local GBI, be it created in socialist times or recently, was completely absent from their mental maps. Instead, people would overcome longer distances and cover higher costs to reach central green spaces. Tacit knowledge, namely the untold general rejection of the entire neighborhood by the residents, was found to be the deeper reason behind non-use of GBI and missing place attachment. The results uncovered that both neighborhood neglect and the multi-scalar character of urban recreational ideas/behavior are factors that help us to understand non-use of urban GBI, two key insights for urban planning.https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol26/iss4/art16/green-blue infrastructurehallemental mappingrecreationsense of placetacit knowledge
spellingShingle Dagmar Haase
Manuel Wolff
Nadja Schumacher
Mapping mental barriers that prevent the use of neighborhood green spaces
Ecology and Society
green-blue infrastructure
halle
mental mapping
recreation
sense of place
tacit knowledge
title Mapping mental barriers that prevent the use of neighborhood green spaces
title_full Mapping mental barriers that prevent the use of neighborhood green spaces
title_fullStr Mapping mental barriers that prevent the use of neighborhood green spaces
title_full_unstemmed Mapping mental barriers that prevent the use of neighborhood green spaces
title_short Mapping mental barriers that prevent the use of neighborhood green spaces
title_sort mapping mental barriers that prevent the use of neighborhood green spaces
topic green-blue infrastructure
halle
mental mapping
recreation
sense of place
tacit knowledge
url https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol26/iss4/art16/
work_keys_str_mv AT dagmarhaase mappingmentalbarriersthatpreventtheuseofneighborhoodgreenspaces
AT manuelwolff mappingmentalbarriersthatpreventtheuseofneighborhoodgreenspaces
AT nadjaschumacher mappingmentalbarriersthatpreventtheuseofneighborhoodgreenspaces