The “grave risk exception”, efficiency and the Hague Convention on Child Abduction: a Law and Economics Approach

Contracting States adopted the Hague Convention on Child Abduction in 1980 after an extensive negotiation effort. The fi nal text added exceptions to the primary objective of prompt return of children wrongfully abducted to a country different from the one he/she habitually resided. Among them, the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Natália Camba Martins, Gustavo Ferreira Ribeiro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centro Universitário Christus 2019-01-01
Series:Revista Opinião Jurídica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/2322
_version_ 1797895888391110656
author Natália Camba Martins
Gustavo Ferreira Ribeiro
author_facet Natália Camba Martins
Gustavo Ferreira Ribeiro
author_sort Natália Camba Martins
collection DOAJ
description Contracting States adopted the Hague Convention on Child Abduction in 1980 after an extensive negotiation effort. The fi nal text added exceptions to the primary objective of prompt return of children wrongfully abducted to a country different from the one he/she habitually resided. Among them, the grave risk exception deals with situations in which the child, upon its return, may face physical or psychological harm or otherwise be placed in an intolerable situation. We posit in this paper that the elaboration and the evolution of this exception have been effi cient-prone in terms of legal design. To support our claim, the paper draws on the methodology of law and economics, more specifi cally on the standard and rules debate. The research demonstrates that the representatives of States faced heightened costs of specifi cations and low frequency of cases, which suggested the adoption of a standard. Moreover, nowadays, enduring specifi cation costs (which prompt for standards) and the elaboration of a Guide of Good Practices related to the concerned exception appear to be the best alternative available to advance its implementation. Therefore, on both its origin and evolvement, the exception follows an effi cient framework in terms of legal design.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T07:32:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1b65d419a56e4b85b38cc1f1e5729916
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1806-0420
2447-6641
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T07:32:54Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Centro Universitário Christus
record_format Article
series Revista Opinião Jurídica
spelling doaj.art-1b65d419a56e4b85b38cc1f1e57299162023-02-23T13:24:10ZengCentro Universitário ChristusRevista Opinião Jurídica1806-04202447-66412019-01-01172417720310.12662/2447-6641oj.v17i24.p177-203.2019654The “grave risk exception”, efficiency and the Hague Convention on Child Abduction: a Law and Economics ApproachNatália Camba Martins0Gustavo Ferreira Ribeiro1UniCEUBUniCEUBContracting States adopted the Hague Convention on Child Abduction in 1980 after an extensive negotiation effort. The fi nal text added exceptions to the primary objective of prompt return of children wrongfully abducted to a country different from the one he/she habitually resided. Among them, the grave risk exception deals with situations in which the child, upon its return, may face physical or psychological harm or otherwise be placed in an intolerable situation. We posit in this paper that the elaboration and the evolution of this exception have been effi cient-prone in terms of legal design. To support our claim, the paper draws on the methodology of law and economics, more specifi cally on the standard and rules debate. The research demonstrates that the representatives of States faced heightened costs of specifi cations and low frequency of cases, which suggested the adoption of a standard. Moreover, nowadays, enduring specifi cation costs (which prompt for standards) and the elaboration of a Guide of Good Practices related to the concerned exception appear to be the best alternative available to advance its implementation. Therefore, on both its origin and evolvement, the exception follows an effi cient framework in terms of legal design.https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/2322international child abductionhague conventiongrave risk exceptionlaw and economicsrules and standards
spellingShingle Natália Camba Martins
Gustavo Ferreira Ribeiro
The “grave risk exception”, efficiency and the Hague Convention on Child Abduction: a Law and Economics Approach
Revista Opinião Jurídica
international child abduction
hague convention
grave risk exception
law and economics
rules and standards
title The “grave risk exception”, efficiency and the Hague Convention on Child Abduction: a Law and Economics Approach
title_full The “grave risk exception”, efficiency and the Hague Convention on Child Abduction: a Law and Economics Approach
title_fullStr The “grave risk exception”, efficiency and the Hague Convention on Child Abduction: a Law and Economics Approach
title_full_unstemmed The “grave risk exception”, efficiency and the Hague Convention on Child Abduction: a Law and Economics Approach
title_short The “grave risk exception”, efficiency and the Hague Convention on Child Abduction: a Law and Economics Approach
title_sort grave risk exception efficiency and the hague convention on child abduction a law and economics approach
topic international child abduction
hague convention
grave risk exception
law and economics
rules and standards
url https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/2322
work_keys_str_mv AT nataliacambamartins thegraveriskexceptionefficiencyandthehagueconventiononchildabductionalawandeconomicsapproach
AT gustavoferreiraribeiro thegraveriskexceptionefficiencyandthehagueconventiononchildabductionalawandeconomicsapproach
AT nataliacambamartins graveriskexceptionefficiencyandthehagueconventiononchildabductionalawandeconomicsapproach
AT gustavoferreiraribeiro graveriskexceptionefficiencyandthehagueconventiononchildabductionalawandeconomicsapproach