Quantifying Perceived Facial Asymmetry to Enhance Physician–Patient Communications

In cosmetic surgery, bridging the anticipation gap between the patients and the physicians can be challenging if there lacks objective and transparent information exchange during the decision-making and surgical process. Among all factors, facial symmetry is the most important for assessing facial a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shu-Yen Wan, Pei-Ying Tsai, Lun-Jou Lo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-09-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/18/8398
_version_ 1797520370356453376
author Shu-Yen Wan
Pei-Ying Tsai
Lun-Jou Lo
author_facet Shu-Yen Wan
Pei-Ying Tsai
Lun-Jou Lo
author_sort Shu-Yen Wan
collection DOAJ
description In cosmetic surgery, bridging the anticipation gap between the patients and the physicians can be challenging if there lacks objective and transparent information exchange during the decision-making and surgical process. Among all factors, facial symmetry is the most important for assessing facial attractiveness. The aim of this work is to promote communications between the two parties by providing a quadruple of quantitative measurements: overall asymmetry index (oAI), asymmetry vector, classification, and confidence vector, using an artificial neural network classifier to model people’s perception acquired from visual questionnaires concerning facial asymmetry. The questionnaire results exhibit a Cronbach’s Alpha value of 0.94 and categorize the respondents’ perception of each stimulus face into perceived normal (PN), perceived asymmetrically normal (PAN), and perceived abnormal (PA) categories. The trained classifier yields an overall root mean squared error < 0.01, and its result shows that the oAI is, in general, proportional to the degree of perceived asymmetry. However, there exist faces that are difficult to classify as either PN or PAN or either PAN or PA with competing confidence values. In such cases, oAI alone is not sufficient to articulate facial asymmetry. Assisting surgeon–patient conversations with the proposed asymmetry quadruple is advised to avoid or to mitigate potential medical disputes.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T07:55:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1b7b3634b76f4ca6864cbcae6e265e84
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3417
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T07:55:48Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-1b7b3634b76f4ca6864cbcae6e265e842023-11-22T11:52:04ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172021-09-011118839810.3390/app11188398Quantifying Perceived Facial Asymmetry to Enhance Physician–Patient CommunicationsShu-Yen Wan0Pei-Ying Tsai1Lun-Jou Lo2Craniofacial Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333008, TaiwanDepartment of Information Management, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333323, TaiwanCraniofacial Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 333008, TaiwanIn cosmetic surgery, bridging the anticipation gap between the patients and the physicians can be challenging if there lacks objective and transparent information exchange during the decision-making and surgical process. Among all factors, facial symmetry is the most important for assessing facial attractiveness. The aim of this work is to promote communications between the two parties by providing a quadruple of quantitative measurements: overall asymmetry index (oAI), asymmetry vector, classification, and confidence vector, using an artificial neural network classifier to model people’s perception acquired from visual questionnaires concerning facial asymmetry. The questionnaire results exhibit a Cronbach’s Alpha value of 0.94 and categorize the respondents’ perception of each stimulus face into perceived normal (PN), perceived asymmetrically normal (PAN), and perceived abnormal (PA) categories. The trained classifier yields an overall root mean squared error < 0.01, and its result shows that the oAI is, in general, proportional to the degree of perceived asymmetry. However, there exist faces that are difficult to classify as either PN or PAN or either PAN or PA with competing confidence values. In such cases, oAI alone is not sufficient to articulate facial asymmetry. Assisting surgeon–patient conversations with the proposed asymmetry quadruple is advised to avoid or to mitigate potential medical disputes.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/18/8398artificial neural networksfacial asymmetryplastic surgerymedical disputes
spellingShingle Shu-Yen Wan
Pei-Ying Tsai
Lun-Jou Lo
Quantifying Perceived Facial Asymmetry to Enhance Physician–Patient Communications
Applied Sciences
artificial neural networks
facial asymmetry
plastic surgery
medical disputes
title Quantifying Perceived Facial Asymmetry to Enhance Physician–Patient Communications
title_full Quantifying Perceived Facial Asymmetry to Enhance Physician–Patient Communications
title_fullStr Quantifying Perceived Facial Asymmetry to Enhance Physician–Patient Communications
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying Perceived Facial Asymmetry to Enhance Physician–Patient Communications
title_short Quantifying Perceived Facial Asymmetry to Enhance Physician–Patient Communications
title_sort quantifying perceived facial asymmetry to enhance physician patient communications
topic artificial neural networks
facial asymmetry
plastic surgery
medical disputes
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/18/8398
work_keys_str_mv AT shuyenwan quantifyingperceivedfacialasymmetrytoenhancephysicianpatientcommunications
AT peiyingtsai quantifyingperceivedfacialasymmetrytoenhancephysicianpatientcommunications
AT lunjoulo quantifyingperceivedfacialasymmetrytoenhancephysicianpatientcommunications