Faculty versus students: different perceptions of misconducts at university

IntroductionAcademic integrity is a goal to be achieved by university institutions, and student academic behavioral misconduct is a phenomenon to be fought and eradicated. Two of the main problems faced by universities in this area are: (1) the lack of consensus among students and faculty on the ser...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nuria Alcalde-Fradejas, Mercedes Marzo-Navarro, Marisa Ramírez-Alesón
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1348057/full
_version_ 1797302455265918976
author Nuria Alcalde-Fradejas
Mercedes Marzo-Navarro
Marisa Ramírez-Alesón
author_facet Nuria Alcalde-Fradejas
Mercedes Marzo-Navarro
Marisa Ramírez-Alesón
author_sort Nuria Alcalde-Fradejas
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionAcademic integrity is a goal to be achieved by university institutions, and student academic behavioral misconduct is a phenomenon to be fought and eradicated. Two of the main problems faced by universities in this area are: (1) the lack of consensus among students and faculty on the seriousness of acts considered academic misconduct; and (2) the difficulty of noticing and controlling certain student behaviors. The main aim of this paper is to assess the importance of these two problems.MethodsFor this purpose, the authors compare, on the one hand, students’ and teachers’ perceptions of the seriousness of different types of dishonest and inappropriate behaviors and, on the other hand, the frequency with which they report that these misconducts occur. Two samples were taken from the responses of students and teachers of the Economics and Business School of the University of Zaragoza. The first consisted of 333 students and the second of 72 teachers. The academic misconducts asked about were grouped into three categories: academic works, exams, and interpersonal relationships in the classroom. Nonparametric tests were used to study the significance of the differences observed in the responses of students and teachers.ResultsResults show that the greatest differences in the assessment of the seriousness of academic misconducts are in the group referring to interpersonal relationships. In terms of frequency, the study reveals that there is a serious problem of moral hazard in some of the behaviors analyzed, since the frequency with which teachers notice these practices is lower than that expressed by students.DiscussionBased on these results, possible measures to be adopted in universities in order to eradicate the academic misconduct problem are discussed.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T23:38:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1b7fdb81e51c4e6eabc30ecb7a3784f9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T23:38:03Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-1b7fdb81e51c4e6eabc30ecb7a3784f92024-02-20T04:42:44ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782024-02-011510.3389/fpsyg.2024.13480571348057Faculty versus students: different perceptions of misconducts at universityNuria Alcalde-Fradejas0Mercedes Marzo-Navarro1Marisa Ramírez-Alesón2Department of Management and Business Organization, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, SpainDepartment of Marketing Management and Market Research, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, SpainDepartment of Management and Business Organization, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, SpainIntroductionAcademic integrity is a goal to be achieved by university institutions, and student academic behavioral misconduct is a phenomenon to be fought and eradicated. Two of the main problems faced by universities in this area are: (1) the lack of consensus among students and faculty on the seriousness of acts considered academic misconduct; and (2) the difficulty of noticing and controlling certain student behaviors. The main aim of this paper is to assess the importance of these two problems.MethodsFor this purpose, the authors compare, on the one hand, students’ and teachers’ perceptions of the seriousness of different types of dishonest and inappropriate behaviors and, on the other hand, the frequency with which they report that these misconducts occur. Two samples were taken from the responses of students and teachers of the Economics and Business School of the University of Zaragoza. The first consisted of 333 students and the second of 72 teachers. The academic misconducts asked about were grouped into three categories: academic works, exams, and interpersonal relationships in the classroom. Nonparametric tests were used to study the significance of the differences observed in the responses of students and teachers.ResultsResults show that the greatest differences in the assessment of the seriousness of academic misconducts are in the group referring to interpersonal relationships. In terms of frequency, the study reveals that there is a serious problem of moral hazard in some of the behaviors analyzed, since the frequency with which teachers notice these practices is lower than that expressed by students.DiscussionBased on these results, possible measures to be adopted in universities in order to eradicate the academic misconduct problem are discussed.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1348057/fullacademic integritysurveyeconomics and business schoolstudentteacher
spellingShingle Nuria Alcalde-Fradejas
Mercedes Marzo-Navarro
Marisa Ramírez-Alesón
Faculty versus students: different perceptions of misconducts at university
Frontiers in Psychology
academic integrity
survey
economics and business school
student
teacher
title Faculty versus students: different perceptions of misconducts at university
title_full Faculty versus students: different perceptions of misconducts at university
title_fullStr Faculty versus students: different perceptions of misconducts at university
title_full_unstemmed Faculty versus students: different perceptions of misconducts at university
title_short Faculty versus students: different perceptions of misconducts at university
title_sort faculty versus students different perceptions of misconducts at university
topic academic integrity
survey
economics and business school
student
teacher
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1348057/full
work_keys_str_mv AT nuriaalcaldefradejas facultyversusstudentsdifferentperceptionsofmisconductsatuniversity
AT mercedesmarzonavarro facultyversusstudentsdifferentperceptionsofmisconductsatuniversity
AT marisaramirezaleson facultyversusstudentsdifferentperceptionsofmisconductsatuniversity