Knowledge work in the age of control: capitalising on human capital

The main claim that I aim to substantiate in this article is that power in the form of control is exerted in a more insidious manner now that knowledge work has become ‘networked’. To this end, I first describe societal control in the current epoch. Given the fact that my focus is on knowledge work...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Benda Hofmeyr
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of the Free State 2022-08-01
Series:Acta Academica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://196.255.246.28/index.php/aa/article/view/5607
_version_ 1797258274340339712
author Benda Hofmeyr
author_facet Benda Hofmeyr
author_sort Benda Hofmeyr
collection DOAJ
description The main claim that I aim to substantiate in this article is that power in the form of control is exerted in a more insidious manner now that knowledge work has become ‘networked’. To this end, I first describe societal control in the current epoch. Given the fact that my focus is on knowledge work, I next revisit the human capital literature with the aim of coming to a more precise understanding of what knowledge work is. The literature on “leveraging human capital” (Burud and Tumolo 2004) evidences how human capital theory draws on the conditions of free-floating control to optimally capitalise on knowledge workers. Models of overt management have come to be replaced by more expansive and insidious models of control that extend beyond the sphere of work into the intimate recesses of private life. Control operative at the societal level (Castells 1996) extends beyond the macro-level (neoliberal), to the meso-level (organisational), and the micro-level (self-governance). Next, I critically consider the implications of these conditions of control for the (self-)governance of the knowledge worker by drawing on Han’s (2017) further specification of control as “smart power”. I come to the conclusion that under the conditions of apparently greater autonomy and discretion that is so pervasive in the management literature discussing knowledge workers, governance as “control” induces constant work erasing the boundaries between work and private life. Neoliberalism with its mantra of investment in human capital has succeeded in producing an optimally efficient, ever-working subject. Throughout my analyses are informed by Foucault’s (2008) concept of “governmentality”, which fuses the presiding rationality (knowledge) with governance (power as control) to throw light on how human conduct is being conducted (orchestrated) for optimal efficiency.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T22:50:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1b8f631dc50d43988ea9c7a5859e3c1c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0587-2405
2415-0479
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T22:50:56Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher University of the Free State
record_format Article
series Acta Academica
spelling doaj.art-1b8f631dc50d43988ea9c7a5859e3c1c2024-03-18T11:04:17ZengUniversity of the Free StateActa Academica0587-24052415-04792022-08-0154110.18820/24150479/aa54i1/3Knowledge work in the age of control: capitalising on human capitalBenda Hofmeyr0University of Pretoria The main claim that I aim to substantiate in this article is that power in the form of control is exerted in a more insidious manner now that knowledge work has become ‘networked’. To this end, I first describe societal control in the current epoch. Given the fact that my focus is on knowledge work, I next revisit the human capital literature with the aim of coming to a more precise understanding of what knowledge work is. The literature on “leveraging human capital” (Burud and Tumolo 2004) evidences how human capital theory draws on the conditions of free-floating control to optimally capitalise on knowledge workers. Models of overt management have come to be replaced by more expansive and insidious models of control that extend beyond the sphere of work into the intimate recesses of private life. Control operative at the societal level (Castells 1996) extends beyond the macro-level (neoliberal), to the meso-level (organisational), and the micro-level (self-governance). Next, I critically consider the implications of these conditions of control for the (self-)governance of the knowledge worker by drawing on Han’s (2017) further specification of control as “smart power”. I come to the conclusion that under the conditions of apparently greater autonomy and discretion that is so pervasive in the management literature discussing knowledge workers, governance as “control” induces constant work erasing the boundaries between work and private life. Neoliberalism with its mantra of investment in human capital has succeeded in producing an optimally efficient, ever-working subject. Throughout my analyses are informed by Foucault’s (2008) concept of “governmentality”, which fuses the presiding rationality (knowledge) with governance (power as control) to throw light on how human conduct is being conducted (orchestrated) for optimal efficiency. http://196.255.246.28/index.php/aa/article/view/5607knowledge workcontrolhuman capitalorganisationsneoliberal governmentality
spellingShingle Benda Hofmeyr
Knowledge work in the age of control: capitalising on human capital
Acta Academica
knowledge work
control
human capital
organisations
neoliberal governmentality
title Knowledge work in the age of control: capitalising on human capital
title_full Knowledge work in the age of control: capitalising on human capital
title_fullStr Knowledge work in the age of control: capitalising on human capital
title_full_unstemmed Knowledge work in the age of control: capitalising on human capital
title_short Knowledge work in the age of control: capitalising on human capital
title_sort knowledge work in the age of control capitalising on human capital
topic knowledge work
control
human capital
organisations
neoliberal governmentality
url http://196.255.246.28/index.php/aa/article/view/5607
work_keys_str_mv AT bendahofmeyr knowledgeworkintheageofcontrolcapitalisingonhumancapital