<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT versus Diagnostic Contrast-Enhanced CT for Follow-Up of Stage IV Melanoma Patients Treated by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Frequency and Management of Discordances over a 3-Year Period in a University Hospital

Aim: To perform a comprehensive analysis of discordances between contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of the extra-cerebral treatment monitoring in patients with stage IV melanoma. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective monocentric obse...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jean-Baptiste Le Goubey, Charline Lasnon, Ines Nakouri, Laure Césaire, Michel de Pontville, Catherine Nganoa, Diane Kottler, Nicolas Aide
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
Series:Diagnostics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/11/7/1198
_version_ 1797527288654331904
author Jean-Baptiste Le Goubey
Charline Lasnon
Ines Nakouri
Laure Césaire
Michel de Pontville
Catherine Nganoa
Diane Kottler
Nicolas Aide
author_facet Jean-Baptiste Le Goubey
Charline Lasnon
Ines Nakouri
Laure Césaire
Michel de Pontville
Catherine Nganoa
Diane Kottler
Nicolas Aide
author_sort Jean-Baptiste Le Goubey
collection DOAJ
description Aim: To perform a comprehensive analysis of discordances between contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of the extra-cerebral treatment monitoring in patients with stage IV melanoma. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective monocentric observational study over a 3-year period in patients referred for <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT and ceCT in the framework of therapy monitoring of immune checkpoint (ICIs) as of January 2017. Imaging reports were analyzed by two physicians in consensus. The anatomical site responsible for discordances, as well as induced changes in treatment were noted. Results: Eighty patients were included and 195 pairs of scans analyzed. Overall, discordances occurred in 65 cases (33%). Eighty percent of the discordances (52/65) were due to <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT scans upstaging the patient. Amongst these discordances, 17/52 (33%) led to change in patient’s management, the most frequent being radiotherapy of a progressing site. ceCT represented 13/65 (20%) of discordances and induced changes in patients’ management in 2/13 cases (15%). The most frequent anatomical site involved was subcutaneous for <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT findings and lung or liver for ceCT. Conclusions: Treatment monitoring with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT is more efficient than ceCT and has a greater impact in patient’s management.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T09:41:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-1b9291bce779471281c406e9b88d7b73
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-4418
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T09:41:49Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Diagnostics
spelling doaj.art-1b9291bce779471281c406e9b88d7b732023-11-22T03:34:09ZengMDPI AGDiagnostics2075-44182021-07-01117119810.3390/diagnostics11071198<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT versus Diagnostic Contrast-Enhanced CT for Follow-Up of Stage IV Melanoma Patients Treated by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Frequency and Management of Discordances over a 3-Year Period in a University HospitalJean-Baptiste Le Goubey0Charline Lasnon1Ines Nakouri2Laure Césaire3Michel de Pontville4Catherine Nganoa5Diane Kottler6Nicolas Aide7Dermatology Department, University Hospital, 14000 Caen, FranceNuclear Medicine Department, François Baclesse Cancer Centre, 14000 Caen, FranceDermatology Department, University Hospital, 14000 Caen, FranceDermatology Department, University Hospital, 14000 Caen, FranceDermatology Department, University Hospital, 14000 Caen, FranceNuclear Medicine Department, University Hospital, 14000 Caen, FranceDermatology Department, University Hospital, 14000 Caen, FranceINSERM ANTICIPE U 1086, Normandy University, 14000 Caen, FranceAim: To perform a comprehensive analysis of discordances between contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of the extra-cerebral treatment monitoring in patients with stage IV melanoma. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective monocentric observational study over a 3-year period in patients referred for <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT and ceCT in the framework of therapy monitoring of immune checkpoint (ICIs) as of January 2017. Imaging reports were analyzed by two physicians in consensus. The anatomical site responsible for discordances, as well as induced changes in treatment were noted. Results: Eighty patients were included and 195 pairs of scans analyzed. Overall, discordances occurred in 65 cases (33%). Eighty percent of the discordances (52/65) were due to <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT scans upstaging the patient. Amongst these discordances, 17/52 (33%) led to change in patient’s management, the most frequent being radiotherapy of a progressing site. ceCT represented 13/65 (20%) of discordances and induced changes in patients’ management in 2/13 cases (15%). The most frequent anatomical site involved was subcutaneous for <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT findings and lung or liver for ceCT. Conclusions: Treatment monitoring with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT is more efficient than ceCT and has a greater impact in patient’s management.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/11/7/1198<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CTcontrast-enhanced CTmelanomametastasestyrosine kinase inhibitorsImmune checkpoint inhibitors
spellingShingle Jean-Baptiste Le Goubey
Charline Lasnon
Ines Nakouri
Laure Césaire
Michel de Pontville
Catherine Nganoa
Diane Kottler
Nicolas Aide
<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT versus Diagnostic Contrast-Enhanced CT for Follow-Up of Stage IV Melanoma Patients Treated by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Frequency and Management of Discordances over a 3-Year Period in a University Hospital
Diagnostics
<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT
contrast-enhanced CT
melanoma
metastases
tyrosine kinase inhibitors
Immune checkpoint inhibitors
title <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT versus Diagnostic Contrast-Enhanced CT for Follow-Up of Stage IV Melanoma Patients Treated by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Frequency and Management of Discordances over a 3-Year Period in a University Hospital
title_full <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT versus Diagnostic Contrast-Enhanced CT for Follow-Up of Stage IV Melanoma Patients Treated by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Frequency and Management of Discordances over a 3-Year Period in a University Hospital
title_fullStr <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT versus Diagnostic Contrast-Enhanced CT for Follow-Up of Stage IV Melanoma Patients Treated by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Frequency and Management of Discordances over a 3-Year Period in a University Hospital
title_full_unstemmed <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT versus Diagnostic Contrast-Enhanced CT for Follow-Up of Stage IV Melanoma Patients Treated by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Frequency and Management of Discordances over a 3-Year Period in a University Hospital
title_short <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT versus Diagnostic Contrast-Enhanced CT for Follow-Up of Stage IV Melanoma Patients Treated by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Frequency and Management of Discordances over a 3-Year Period in a University Hospital
title_sort sup 18 sup f fdg pet ct versus diagnostic contrast enhanced ct for follow up of stage iv melanoma patients treated by immune checkpoint inhibitors frequency and management of discordances over a 3 year period in a university hospital
topic <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT
contrast-enhanced CT
melanoma
metastases
tyrosine kinase inhibitors
Immune checkpoint inhibitors
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/11/7/1198
work_keys_str_mv AT jeanbaptistelegoubey sup18supffdgpetctversusdiagnosticcontrastenhancedctforfollowupofstageivmelanomapatientstreatedbyimmunecheckpointinhibitorsfrequencyandmanagementofdiscordancesovera3yearperiodinauniversityhospital
AT charlinelasnon sup18supffdgpetctversusdiagnosticcontrastenhancedctforfollowupofstageivmelanomapatientstreatedbyimmunecheckpointinhibitorsfrequencyandmanagementofdiscordancesovera3yearperiodinauniversityhospital
AT inesnakouri sup18supffdgpetctversusdiagnosticcontrastenhancedctforfollowupofstageivmelanomapatientstreatedbyimmunecheckpointinhibitorsfrequencyandmanagementofdiscordancesovera3yearperiodinauniversityhospital
AT laurecesaire sup18supffdgpetctversusdiagnosticcontrastenhancedctforfollowupofstageivmelanomapatientstreatedbyimmunecheckpointinhibitorsfrequencyandmanagementofdiscordancesovera3yearperiodinauniversityhospital
AT micheldepontville sup18supffdgpetctversusdiagnosticcontrastenhancedctforfollowupofstageivmelanomapatientstreatedbyimmunecheckpointinhibitorsfrequencyandmanagementofdiscordancesovera3yearperiodinauniversityhospital
AT catherinenganoa sup18supffdgpetctversusdiagnosticcontrastenhancedctforfollowupofstageivmelanomapatientstreatedbyimmunecheckpointinhibitorsfrequencyandmanagementofdiscordancesovera3yearperiodinauniversityhospital
AT dianekottler sup18supffdgpetctversusdiagnosticcontrastenhancedctforfollowupofstageivmelanomapatientstreatedbyimmunecheckpointinhibitorsfrequencyandmanagementofdiscordancesovera3yearperiodinauniversityhospital
AT nicolasaide sup18supffdgpetctversusdiagnosticcontrastenhancedctforfollowupofstageivmelanomapatientstreatedbyimmunecheckpointinhibitorsfrequencyandmanagementofdiscordancesovera3yearperiodinauniversityhospital